Kenora-Rainy River Districts Child and Family Services v. K.R.

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
JudgeFairburn A.C.J.O., MacPherson and Gillese JJ.A.
Citation2021 ONCA 123
Docket NumberC68485
Date24 February 2021

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 practice notes
  • A.E v. A.E.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 13, 2021
    ...in assessing the criteria articulated in section 5(6) (Brett v. Brett, [1999] O.J. No. 1384 (C.A.), at paras. 30-34; Booth v. Bilek, 2021 ONCA 123 (C.A.), at para. 12).  Once it is established that the case engages one or more of the factors set out in those subparagraphs, the court mu......
  • J.M.M. v C.R.M
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 26, 2025
    ...in assessing the criteria articulated in section 5(6) ( Brett v. Brett, [1999] O.J. No. 1384 (C.A.), at paras. 30–34; Booth v. Bilek, 2021 ONCA 123 (C.A.), at para. 12). Once it is established that the case engages one or more of the factors set out in those subparagraphs, the court must th......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 22 ' February 26, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 2, 2021
    ...Occupiers' Liability Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O.2 Short Civil Decisions Kenora-Rainy River Districts Child and Family Services v. K.R., 2021 ONCA 123 Keywords: Family Law, Child Protection, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Appeals, Jurisdiction, Final or Interlocutory, Child and Family Services Act......
  • Jarrett v Jarrett
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 17, 2025
    ...articulated in section 5(6) ( Brett v. Brett, 1999 CanLII 3711 (ON CA), [1999] O.J. No. 1384 (C.A.), at paras. 30–34; Booth v. Bilek, 2021 ONCA 123 (C.A.), at para. 69 I do, however, find that the husband's conduct with respect to the sale of MH was willful, and intentional and as such, it ......
3 cases
  • A.E v. A.E.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 13, 2021
    ...in assessing the criteria articulated in section 5(6) (Brett v. Brett, [1999] O.J. No. 1384 (C.A.), at paras. 30-34; Booth v. Bilek, 2021 ONCA 123 (C.A.), at para. 12).  Once it is established that the case engages one or more of the factors set out in those subparagraphs, the court mu......
  • J.M.M. v C.R.M
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 26, 2025
    ...in assessing the criteria articulated in section 5(6) ( Brett v. Brett, [1999] O.J. No. 1384 (C.A.), at paras. 30–34; Booth v. Bilek, 2021 ONCA 123 (C.A.), at para. 12). Once it is established that the case engages one or more of the factors set out in those subparagraphs, the court must th......
  • Jarrett v Jarrett
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 17, 2025
    ...articulated in section 5(6) ( Brett v. Brett, 1999 CanLII 3711 (ON CA), [1999] O.J. No. 1384 (C.A.), at paras. 30–34; Booth v. Bilek, 2021 ONCA 123 (C.A.), at para. 69 I do, however, find that the husband's conduct with respect to the sale of MH was willful, and intentional and as such, it ......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 22 ' February 26, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 2, 2021
    ...Occupiers' Liability Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O.2 Short Civil Decisions Kenora-Rainy River Districts Child and Family Services v. K.R., 2021 ONCA 123 Keywords: Family Law, Child Protection, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Appeals, Jurisdiction, Final or Interlocutory, Child and Family Services Act......