King v. Borserio, 2018 BCCA 308
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Saunders,The Honourable Madam Justice Fenlon,The Honourable Madam Justice Griffin |
Citation | 2018 BCCA 308 |
Date | 26 July 2018 |
Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
Docket Number | CA44631 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
A.P. v. J.C., 2018 BCSC 1381
...A.L. v. L.W., 2017 BCSC 964, at para. 8. The court must not abdicate its role in favour of the recommendations made: King v. Borserio, 2018 BCCA 308, at para. 76. Regardless of the information that goes to the report writer, the court ultimately has the discretion to review the background i......
-
M.F.W. v. M.A.H., 2020 BCCA 284
...“expert” and indeed, that the Court should not “abdicate” its role in favour of an assessor’s recommendations: see King v. Borserio 2018 BCCA 308 at para. 76. As observed in A.P. v. J.C. 2018 BCSC 1381: The context under s. 211 is not comparable to that of an expert retained by a party in a......
-
M.S.R. v. D.M.R., 2022 BCSC 1398
...outweighs this. I am aware that the court must not abdicate its duty in favour of recommendations made by the expert: King v. Borserio, 2018 BCCA 308 at para. 76. Where I have accepted Dr. Aube’s findings, I have done so with these principles in [287] In my view the......
-
K.M.N. v S.Z.M.,
...not bound by the parenting recommendations made in a s. 211 report: M.F.W. v. M.A.H., 2020 BCCA 284 at para. 22, citing King v. Borserio, 2018 BCCA 308. However, I note that the graduated schedule crafted by the judge was not the schedule recommended by the author of the s. 211 report in th......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
A.P. v. J.C., 2018 BCSC 1381
...A.L. v. L.W., 2017 BCSC 964, at para. 8. The court must not abdicate its role in favour of the recommendations made: King v. Borserio, 2018 BCCA 308, at para. 76. Regardless of the information that goes to the report writer, the court ultimately has the discretion to review the background i......
-
M.F.W. v. M.A.H., 2020 BCCA 284
...“expert” and indeed, that the Court should not “abdicate” its role in favour of an assessor’s recommendations: see King v. Borserio 2018 BCCA 308 at para. 76. As observed in A.P. v. J.C. 2018 BCSC 1381: The context under s. 211 is not comparable to that of an expert retained by a party in a......
-
M.S.R. v. D.M.R.,
...outweighs this. I am aware that the court must not abdicate its duty in favour of recommendations made by the expert: King v. Borserio, 2018 BCCA 308 at para. 76. Where I have accepted Dr. Aube’s findings, I have done so with these principles in [287] In my view the......
-
R.C.L.N. v. A.D.N., 2018 BCSC 2263
...2015 BCCA 8 at para. 66. [84] In J.B.D.K. v. T.A.B., 2017 BCSC 1186, aff’d 2018 BCCA 308, the Court at para. 58 If the court concludes that the question of primary residence is balanced as between the parents, or the only custodial ......
Request a trial to view additional results