Kissel v Rocky View (County)

CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice J.T. Eamon
Citation2020 ABQB 406
Date16 July 2020
Docket Number1901 11027

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
13 practice notes
  • Terrigno v Calgary (City), 2021 ABQB 41
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 15, 2021
    ...Farms Ltd v Calgary (City), 2019 ABQB 123; Ponoka Right to Farm Society v Ponoka (County), 2020 ABQB 273; Kissel v Rocky View (County), 2020 ABQB 406). Section 539 No bylaw or resolution may be challenged on the ground that it is unreasonable. [33] With respect, I disagree with those cases’......
  • The Boundaries of Judicial Review Since Highwood Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses v. Wall.
    • Canada
    • Queen's Law Journal Vol. 47 No. 1, September 2021
    • September 22, 2021
    ...(112.) Alie-Kirkpatrick v Saskatoon (City), 2019 SKCA 92 at para 40. (113.) See ibid at para 65. (114.) See Kissel v Rocky View (County), 2020 ABQB 406. (115.) See Geophysical Service Inc v Canada (AG), 2020 FC (116.) See Cyr v Batchewana First Nation of Ojibways, 2021 FC 512. (117.) See Wi......
  • Kissel v Rocky View (County), 2020 ABQB 570
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 30, 2020
    ...deals with costs of these judicial review proceedings, following release of my decision on the merits in Kissel v Rocky View (County), 2020 ABQB 406. [2] The Applicants are elected Councillors of Rocky View County, a municipal government under the Municipal Government Act, RSA 2000, c M-26 ......
  • Bergman v Innisfree (Village), 2020 ABQB 661
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 29, 2020
    ...ABQB 123 [Brodylo Farms], Ponoka Right to Farm Society v Ponoka (County), 2020 ABQB 273 at paras 12-13, and Kissel v Rocky View (County), 2020 ABQB 406 at para 43 – is limited to municipal council decisions made pursuant to section 547, in relation to an order to remedy contraventions (s 54......
  • Get Started for Free
12 cases
  • Terrigno v Calgary (City), 2021 ABQB 41
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 15, 2021
    ...Farms Ltd v Calgary (City), 2019 ABQB 123; Ponoka Right to Farm Society v Ponoka (County), 2020 ABQB 273; Kissel v Rocky View (County), 2020 ABQB 406). Section 539 No bylaw or resolution may be challenged on the ground that it is unreasonable. [33] With respect, I disagree with those cases’......
  • Kissel v Rocky View (County), 2020 ABQB 570
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 30, 2020
    ...deals with costs of these judicial review proceedings, following release of my decision on the merits in Kissel v Rocky View (County), 2020 ABQB 406. [2] The Applicants are elected Councillors of Rocky View County, a municipal government under the Municipal Government Act, RSA 2000, c M-26 ......
  • Bergman v Innisfree (Village), 2020 ABQB 661
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 29, 2020
    ...ABQB 123 [Brodylo Farms], Ponoka Right to Farm Society v Ponoka (County), 2020 ABQB 273 at paras 12-13, and Kissel v Rocky View (County), 2020 ABQB 406 at para 43 – is limited to municipal council decisions made pursuant to section 547, in relation to an order to remedy contraventions (s 54......
  • Sedgwick v Edmonton Real Estate Board Co-Operative Listing Bureau Limited, 2021 ABQB 59
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 21, 2021
    ...is sufficiently public (Highwood at para 14; JW v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 SCC 20 [JW] at para 101; Kissel v Rocky View (County), 2020 ABQB 406 at para 92 [Kissel]; Eksteen v University of Alberta, 2019 ABQB 881 at para 11 [51] Highwood marked a shift in the law away from courts too ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • The Boundaries of Judicial Review Since Highwood Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses v. Wall.
    • Canada
    • Queen's Law Journal Vol. 47 No. 1, September 2021
    • September 22, 2021
    ...(112.) Alie-Kirkpatrick v Saskatoon (City), 2019 SKCA 92 at para 40. (113.) See ibid at para 65. (114.) See Kissel v Rocky View (County), 2020 ABQB 406. (115.) See Geophysical Service Inc v Canada (AG), 2020 FC (116.) See Cyr v Batchewana First Nation of Ojibways, 2021 FC 512. (117.) See Wi......