Koppalapillai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 235
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FC 235 |
| Date | 02 March 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Maarouf v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 787
...of an exception to Cepeda-Gutierrez principles for country condition evidence, see Koppalapillai v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 235, at paras 21-25; Agudo, at paras 42-43. The reasons in this case do not enable the Court to understand why the RPD made the decision it [54] T......
-
Agudo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 320
...exemption from the Cepeda-Gutierrez analysis: see the discussion of Boswell J. in Koppalapillai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 235, at paras 20-25, and in particular, the “pragmatic” approach to this issue applied by Boswell J. based on Vargas Bustos v Canada......
-
Asiri v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1025
...of review to assess a PRRA officer’s decision is that of reasonableness (see, e.g.: Koppalapillai v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 235 at para 13, 289 ACWS (3d) 787; Wang v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 799 at para 11, 191 ACWS (3d) 574). The stand......
-
Jeyaredsagathas v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) [h, 2018 FC 1238
...is a matter of weight, and it is not the role of this Court to reweigh the evidence (Koppalapillai v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 235 at para 15). [32] In rejecting Mr. Jeyaredsagathas’ sur place claim, the RPD observed that Mr. Jeyaredsagathas had “failed to establish how ......
4 cases
-
Maarouf v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 787
...of an exception to Cepeda-Gutierrez principles for country condition evidence, see Koppalapillai v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 235, at paras 21-25; Agudo, at paras 42-43. The reasons in this case do not enable the Court to understand why the RPD made the decision it [54] T......
-
Agudo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 320
...exemption from the Cepeda-Gutierrez analysis: see the discussion of Boswell J. in Koppalapillai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 235, at paras 20-25, and in particular, the “pragmatic” approach to this issue applied by Boswell J. based on Vargas Bustos v Canada......
-
Asiri v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1025
...of review to assess a PRRA officer’s decision is that of reasonableness (see, e.g.: Koppalapillai v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 235 at para 13, 289 ACWS (3d) 787; Wang v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 799 at para 11, 191 ACWS (3d) 574). The stand......
-
Jeyaredsagathas v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) [h, 2018 FC 1238
...is a matter of weight, and it is not the role of this Court to reweigh the evidence (Koppalapillai v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 235 at para 15). [32] In rejecting Mr. Jeyaredsagathas’ sur place claim, the RPD observed that Mr. Jeyaredsagathas had “failed to establish how ......