KORMOS v. KORMOS, 2018 SKQB 195
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | BROWN J. |
| Citation | 2018 SKQB 195 |
| Date | 04 July 2018 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Docket Number | DIV 44 of 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Digest: Kormos v Kormos, 2018 SKQB 195
...as: 2018 SKQB 195 Docket Number: DIV 44/14 JCY , QB17583 Court: Court of Queen's Bench Date: 2019-07-18 Judges: Brown Subjects: Family Law � Family Property � Valuation Family Law � Spousal Support Digest: The parties married in 1991 and separated in 2014. During the marriage the respondent......
-
Dungey v Dungey,
...[2015] 6 WWR 626 [Ackerman]; Thomas v Thomas, 2016 SKCA 53, [2016] 9 WWR 1 [Thomas]; Rapp v Baumann, 2018 SKQB 134; and Kormos v Kormos, 2018 SKQB 195, for guidance with regard to choice of valuation date. [17] The trial judge determined market forces were not the cause of the increase in v......
-
Tysseland v Tysseland,
...“Generally, the entire home quarter on which the house is located is considered a family home”. See also: Kormos v Kormos, 2018 SKQB 195 at para 156; Harding v Warkentin, 2016 SKQB 238 at para 58, 21 ETR (4th) 252; and Kerr v Kerr (1980), 6 Sask R 188 (CanLII) (QB) at par......
-
DUNGEY v DUNGEY, 2019 SKQB 34
...when the trial proceeded. 110 The date of petition is the appropriate date on which to value the family property. [41] Kormos v Kormos, 2018 SKQB 195, demonstrates that the analysis is applied consistently regardless of the actual success of the 118 It may not always be possible to choose o......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
Dungey v Dungey,
...[2015] 6 WWR 626 [Ackerman]; Thomas v Thomas, 2016 SKCA 53, [2016] 9 WWR 1 [Thomas]; Rapp v Baumann, 2018 SKQB 134; and Kormos v Kormos, 2018 SKQB 195, for guidance with regard to choice of valuation date. [17] The trial judge determined market forces were not the cause of the increase in v......
-
Tysseland v Tysseland,
...“Generally, the entire home quarter on which the house is located is considered a family home”. See also: Kormos v Kormos, 2018 SKQB 195 at para 156; Harding v Warkentin, 2016 SKQB 238 at para 58, 21 ETR (4th) 252; and Kerr v Kerr (1980), 6 Sask R 188 (CanLII) (QB) at par......
-
DUNGEY v DUNGEY, 2019 SKQB 34
...when the trial proceeded. 110 The date of petition is the appropriate date on which to value the family property. [41] Kormos v Kormos, 2018 SKQB 195, demonstrates that the analysis is applied consistently regardless of the actual success of the 118 It may not always be possible to choose o......
-
SHIRKIE v. SHIRKIE, 2019 SKQB 33
...[35] I addressed the approach to spousal support in B.N.M. v P.J.M., 2017 SKQB 331 at para 177 which is referred to in Kormos v Kormos, 2018 SKQB 195 at para 194 as 194 … 177 Determining entitlement to spousal support is not an accounting exercise such as occurs in the division of family pr......
1 books & journal articles
-
Digest: Kormos v Kormos, 2018 SKQB 195
...as: 2018 SKQB 195 Docket Number: DIV 44/14 JCY , QB17583 Court: Court of Queen's Bench Date: 2019-07-18 Judges: Brown Subjects: Family Law � Family Property � Valuation Family Law � Spousal Support Digest: The parties married in 1991 and separated in 2014. During the marriage the respondent......