Krayzel Corp. v. Equitable Trust Co.
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, Beverley; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Cromwell, Thomas Albert; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Wagner, Richard; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell |
| Citation | 2016 SCC 18,[2016] 1 SCR 273,[2016] SCJ No 18 (QL) |
| Docket Number | 36123 |
| Date | 06 May 2016 |
| Subject Matter | CONTRACTS,CRIMINAL LAW,INTEREST |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 practice notes
-
Jonsson v Lymer
...become “obsolete” unless and until the Legislature repeals it. As noted in Krayzel Corp v Equitable Trust Co, 2016 SCC 18 at para 32, [2016] 1 SCR 273: 32 . . . This Court has recently observed that it cannot “do by ‘interpretation’ what Parliament chose not to do by enactment”: Canadian Br......
Get Started for Free
18 cases
-
Reference re Impact Assessment Act
...Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. SODRAC 2003 Inc., 2015 SCC 57, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 615; Krayzel Corp. v. Equitable Trust Co., 2016 SCC 18, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 273; R. v. Hinchey, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 1128; R. v. Khill, 2021 SCC 37; Fowler v. The Queen, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 213; Delgamuukw v. British Columbia,......
-
Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167
...become “obsolete” unless and until the Legislature repeals it. As noted in Krayzel Corp v Equitable Trust Co, 2016 SCC 18 at para 32, [2016] 1 SCR 273: 32 . . . This Court has recently observed that it cannot “do by ‘interpretation’ what Parliament chose not to do by enactment”: Canadian Br......
-
TMSSD Inc. v Ojeikere
...any rate not greater than the rate payable on principal money not in arrears. 30 In Krayzel Corp. v. Equitable Trust Co., 2016 SCC 18, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 273 (“ Krayzel”), at para. 21, Brown J., writing for the majority of the Supreme Court of Canada, explained that the purpose of s. 8(1) is t......
-
Rabinowitz v 2528061 Ontario Inc.
...virtue of the passage of time, unrelated to arrears, it will not run afoul of s. 8: Krayzel Corp. v. Equitable Trust Co., 2016 SCC 18, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 273, at para. 25; Alleghe Mortgage Fund Ltd. v. 1988758 Ontario Inc., 2021 ONSC 4887, 157 O.R. (3d) 432 (Div. 122 The plaintiff argues that ......
Get Started for Free