Krayzel Corp. v. Equitable Trust Co., 2016 SCC 18
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, Beverley; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Cromwell, Thomas Albert; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Wagner, Richard; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell |
| Citation | 2016 SCC 18,[2016] 1 SCR 273,[2016] SCJ No 18 (QL) |
| Date | 06 May 2016 |
| Subject Matter | CONTRACTS,CRIMINAL LAW,INTEREST |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 36123 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 practice notes
-
Reference re Impact Assessment Act, 2023 SCC 23
...Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. SODRAC 2003 Inc., 2015 SCC 57, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 615; Krayzel Corp. v. Equitable Trust Co., 2016 SCC 18, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 273; R. v. Hinchey, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 1128; R. v. Khill, 2021 SCC 37; Fowler v. The Queen, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 213; Delgamuukw v. British Columbia,......
-
Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167
...become “obsolete” unless and until the Legislature repeals it. As noted in Krayzel Corp v Equitable Trust Co, 2016 SCC 18 at para 32, [2016] 1 SCR 273: 32 . . . This Court has recently observed that it cannot “do by ‘interpretation’ what Parliament chose not to do by enactment”: Canadian Br......
-
7550111 Canada Inc. v. Charles, 2020 ONCA 386
...terms is to impose a higher rate on arrears than on money not in arrears: Krayzel Corp. v. Equitable Trust Co., 2016 SCC 18, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 273, at para. 25. As this was not argued before the motion judge, he did not make such a [19] Second, the evidentiary record does not permit this cour......
-
Prudent Excellence Mortgage Investment Corporation v. Triumph Development HK Bradford Twin Regency Inc.,,
...prohibit increases in the applicable rate of interest tied to an event of default: Krayzel Corp. v. Equitable Trust Co., 2016 SCC 18, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 273 at para. “An interest rate increase triggered by default infringes s. 8 of the Interest Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. I-15, regardless of w......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
-
Reference re Impact Assessment Act, 2023 SCC 23
...Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. SODRAC 2003 Inc., 2015 SCC 57, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 615; Krayzel Corp. v. Equitable Trust Co., 2016 SCC 18, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 273; R. v. Hinchey, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 1128; R. v. Khill, 2021 SCC 37; Fowler v. The Queen, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 213; Delgamuukw v. British Columbia,......
-
Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167
...become “obsolete” unless and until the Legislature repeals it. As noted in Krayzel Corp v Equitable Trust Co, 2016 SCC 18 at para 32, [2016] 1 SCR 273: 32 . . . This Court has recently observed that it cannot “do by ‘interpretation’ what Parliament chose not to do by enactment”: Canadian Br......
-
7550111 Canada Inc. v. Charles, 2020 ONCA 386
...terms is to impose a higher rate on arrears than on money not in arrears: Krayzel Corp. v. Equitable Trust Co., 2016 SCC 18, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 273, at para. 25. As this was not argued before the motion judge, he did not make such a [19] Second, the evidentiary record does not permit this cour......
-
Greenpath Capital Partners Inc v. Trilend Inc. et al,
...not in arrears. [74] In Krayzel Corp. v. Equitable Trust Co., 2016 SCC 18, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 273 (“Krayzel”), at para. 21, Brown J., writing for the majority of the Supreme Court of Canada, explained that the purpose of......
Request a trial to view additional results