Lameman v. Can. (A.G.), (2004) 365 A.R. 1 (QB)
| Judge | Slatter, J. |
| Neutral Citation | 2004 ABQB 655 |
| Citation | (2004), 365 A.R. 1 (QB),2004 ABQB 655,[2005] 8 WWR 442,365 AR 1,43 Alta LR (4th) 41,[2004] CarswellAlta 1170,[2004] AJ No 999 (QL),[2004] 4 CNLR 110,365 A.R. 1,(2004), 365 AR 1 (QB),[2004] A.J. No 999 (QL) |
| Date | 11 May 2004 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
60 practice notes
-
Samson Indian Band v. Canada (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development) et al.,
...372 ; 372 N.R. 239 ; 429 A.R. 26 ; 421 W.A.C. 26 ; 2008 SCC 14 , refd to. [para. 18]. Lameman et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) (2004), 365 A.R. 1; 2004 ABQB 655 , refd to. [para. Papaschase Indian Band (Descendants of) v. Canada (Attorney General) - see Lameman et al. v. Canada (Att......
-
Wesley v Alberta,
...see Shot Both Sides v Canada, 2024 SCC 12 at paras. 58-59, 490 DLR (4th) 585; Papaschase Indian Band No. 136 v Canada (Attorney General), 2004 ABQB 655 at paras. 125-30, 43 Alta LR (4th) 41, 365 AR 1, reversed on other grounds, Lameman v Canada (Attorney General), 2006 ABCA 392, 66 Alta LR ......
-
Iskatewizaagegan No. 39 Independent First Nation v. Winnipeg (City), 2021 ONSC 1209
...86, 100; Guerin v. The Queen, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 335 at pp. 349, 383. [86] Papaschase Indian Band No. 136 v. Canada (Attorney General), 2004 ABQB 655 at para. 83. [87] Williams Lake Indian Band v. Canada (Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development), 2018 SCC 4 at para. 46; Wewaykum Indian Ban......
-
Kelly et al. v. Canada (Attorney General),
...and Parliament was able to vary Aboriginal or treaty rights if it chose: Papaschase Indian Band No. 136 v. Canada (Attorney General) , 2004 ABQB 655 at para. 50. [63] In contrast to Aboriginal rights and treaty rights, an Aboriginal's rights as the beneficiary of a fiduciary duty are not co......
Get Started for Free
56 cases
-
Weir-Jones Technical Services Incorporated v Purolator Courier Ltd,
...that the same rule still applies under the new Limitations Act , citing Papaschase Indian Band No. 136 v Canada (Attorney General), 2004 ABQB 655 at para 155, 365 AR 1 , aff'd Canada (Attorney General) v Lameman, 2008 SCC 14 at para. 12, [2008] 1 SCR 372 . The breach of contract in Pap......
-
Kelly et al. v. Canada (Attorney General), [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 1220
...and Parliament was able to vary Aboriginal or treaty rights if it chose: Papaschase Indian Band No. 136 v. Canada (Attorney General) , 2004 ABQB 655 at para. 50. [63] In contrast to Aboriginal rights and treaty rights, an Aboriginal's rights as the beneficiary of a fiduciary duty are not co......
-
Callihoo et al. v. Canada (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development) et al., (2006) 402 A.R. 1 (QB)
...of) v. Canada (Attorney General) - see Lameman et al. v. Canada (Attorney General). Lameman et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) (2004), 365 A.R. 1; 2004 ABQB 655, refd to. [para. 20]. Jager Industries Inc. v. Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd. et al. (2000), 273 A.R. 1; 2000 ABQB 592, refd ......
-
Wesley v Alberta,
...see Shot Both Sides v Canada, 2024 SCC 12 at paras. 58-59, 490 DLR (4th) 585; Papaschase Indian Band No. 136 v Canada (Attorney General), 2004 ABQB 655 at paras. 125-30, 43 Alta LR (4th) 41, 365 AR 1, reversed on other grounds, Lameman v Canada (Attorney General), 2006 ABCA 392, 66 Alta LR ......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
ABKB Decision Confirms That Constitutionally Protected Aboriginal Rights Are Captured By Limitation Defences
...[Manitoba Métis]. 4 Wewaykum Indian Band v Canada, 2002 SCC 79 [Wewaykum]. 5 Papaschase Indian Band No 136 v Canada (Attorney General), 2004 ABQB 655, rev'd on other grounds 2006 ABCA 392 and restored 2008 SCC 14 6 Manitoba Métis. 7 Manitoba Métis. 8 Wewaykum. 9 Lameman. The content of this......
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...Inc v the Queen [1985] 1 SCR 441 ...............................174, 177 Papaschase Indian Band No 136 v Canada (Attorney General), 2004 ABQB 655 ........................................................................................ 402, 404–8 Parks v Christian Horizons (1992), 16 CHRR D/......
-
Time Is on Our Side: Colonialism through Laches and Limitations of Actions in the Age of Reconciliation
...that there was a breach of the honour of the Crown. Ultimately the Court 30 Papaschase Indian Band No 136 v Canada (Attorney General) , 2004 ABQB 655. 31 Papaschase SCC, above note 21 at para 17. 32 Ibid at paras 10–20. 33 Ibid at para 18 . 34 MMF, above note 2. 35 SC 1870, 33 Victoria, c 3......