Lameman v. Can. (A.G.), (2004) 365 A.R. 1 (QB)

JudgeSlatter, J.
Neutral Citation2004 ABQB 655
Citation(2004), 365 A.R. 1 (QB),2004 ABQB 655,[2005] 8 WWR 442,365 AR 1,43 Alta LR (4th) 41,[2004] CarswellAlta 1170,[2004] AJ No 999 (QL),[2004] 4 CNLR 110,365 A.R. 1,(2004), 365 AR 1 (QB),[2004] A.J. No 999 (QL)
Date11 May 2004
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
60 practice notes
  • Samson Indian Band v. Canada (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development) et al.,
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 9 Julio 2015
    ...372 ; 372 N.R. 239 ; 429 A.R. 26 ; 421 W.A.C. 26 ; 2008 SCC 14 , refd to. [para. 18]. Lameman et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) (2004), 365 A.R. 1; 2004 ABQB 655 , refd to. [para. Papaschase Indian Band (Descendants of) v. Canada (Attorney General) - see Lameman et al. v. Canada (Att......
  • Wesley v Alberta,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 23 Agosto 2024
    ...see Shot Both Sides v Canada, 2024 SCC 12 at paras. 58-59, 490 DLR (4th) 585; Papaschase Indian Band No. 136 v Canada (Attorney General), 2004 ABQB 655 at paras. 125-30, 43 Alta LR (4th) 41, 365 AR 1, reversed on other grounds, Lameman v Canada (Attorney General), 2006 ABCA 392, 66 Alta LR ......
  • Iskatewizaagegan No. 39 Independent First Nation v. Winnipeg (City), 2021 ONSC 1209
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 17 Febrero 2021
    ...86, 100; Guerin v. The Queen, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 335 at pp. 349, 383. [86] Papaschase Indian Band No. 136 v. Canada (Attorney General), 2004 ABQB 655 at para. 83. [87] Williams Lake Indian Band v. Canada (Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development), 2018 SCC 4 at para. 46; Wewaykum Indian Ban......
  • Kelly et al. v. Canada (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 26 Febrero 2013
    ...and Parliament was able to vary Aboriginal or treaty rights if it chose: Papaschase Indian Band No. 136 v. Canada (Attorney General) , 2004 ABQB 655 at para. 50. [63] In contrast to Aboriginal rights and treaty rights, an Aboriginal's rights as the beneficiary of a fiduciary duty are not co......
  • Get Started for Free
56 cases
  • Weir-Jones Technical Services Incorporated v Purolator Courier Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 6 Febrero 2019
    ...that the same rule still applies under the new Limitations Act , citing Papaschase Indian Band No. 136 v Canada (Attorney General), 2004 ABQB 655 at para 155, 365 AR 1 , aff'd Canada (Attorney General) v Lameman, 2008 SCC 14 at para. 12, [2008] 1 SCR 372 . The breach of contract in Pap......
  • Kelly et al. v. Canada (Attorney General), [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 1220
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 26 Febrero 2013
    ...and Parliament was able to vary Aboriginal or treaty rights if it chose: Papaschase Indian Band No. 136 v. Canada (Attorney General) , 2004 ABQB 655 at para. 50. [63] In contrast to Aboriginal rights and treaty rights, an Aboriginal's rights as the beneficiary of a fiduciary duty are not co......
  • Callihoo et al. v. Canada (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development) et al., (2006) 402 A.R. 1 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 3 Enero 2006
    ...of) v. Canada (Attorney General) - see Lameman et al. v. Canada (Attorney General). Lameman et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) (2004), 365 A.R. 1; 2004 ABQB 655, refd to. [para. 20]. Jager Industries Inc. v. Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd. et al. (2000), 273 A.R. 1; 2000 ABQB 592, refd ......
  • Wesley v Alberta,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 23 Agosto 2024
    ...see Shot Both Sides v Canada, 2024 SCC 12 at paras. 58-59, 490 DLR (4th) 585; Papaschase Indian Band No. 136 v Canada (Attorney General), 2004 ABQB 655 at paras. 125-30, 43 Alta LR (4th) 41, 365 AR 1, reversed on other grounds, Lameman v Canada (Attorney General), 2006 ABCA 392, 66 Alta LR ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law Society of Upper Canada Special Lectures 2017
    • 24 Junio 2021
    ...Inc v the Queen [1985] 1 SCR 441 ...............................174, 177 Papaschase Indian Band No 136 v Canada (Attorney General), 2004 ABQB 655 ........................................................................................ 402, 404–8 Parks v Christian Horizons (1992), 16 CHRR D/......
  • Time Is on Our Side: Colonialism through Laches and Limitations of Actions in the Age of Reconciliation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law Society of Upper Canada Special Lectures 2017
    • 24 Junio 2021
    ...that there was a breach of the honour of the Crown. Ultimately the Court 30 Papaschase Indian Band No 136 v Canada (Attorney General) , 2004 ABQB 655. 31 Papaschase SCC, above note 21 at para 17. 32 Ibid at paras 10–20. 33 Ibid at para 18 . 34 MMF, above note 2. 35 SC 1870, 33 Victoria, c 3......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT