Lapointe Rosenstein Marchand Melançon LLP v. Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, 2016 SCC 30
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, Beverley; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Cromwell, Thomas Albert; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Wagner, Richard; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne |
| Citation | 2016 SCC 30,[2016] 1 SCR 851,[2016] SCJ No 30 (QL),[2016] CarswellOnt 10977 |
| Docket Number | 36087 |
| Subject Matter | COURTS,CONFLICT OF LAWS,PRACTICE,CONTRACTS |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Date | 15 July 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
25 practice notes
-
Sharp v. Autorité des marchés financiers, 2023 SCC 29
...(Trustee of), [1999] 3 S.C.R. 375; Lapointe Rosenstein Marchand Melançon LLP v. Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, 2016 SCC 30, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 851; Autorité des marchés financiers v. Fournier, 2012 QCCA 1179; Donaldson v. Autorité des marchés financiers, 2020 QCCA ......
-
Table of cases
...248 Lapointe Rosenstein Marchand Melançon LLP v Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, [2016] 1 SCR 851 ................................................................ 302 Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc v PSKS Inc, 551 US 877 (2007) ............. 459 Lin v Airbnb, Inc, 2019 FC 1563 ...............
-
Agreements Between Competitors
...connection test,” see, e.g., R v Libman , [1985] 2 SCR 178; Lapointe Rosenstein Marchand Melançon LLP v Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP , [2016] 1 SCR 851. In the case of guilty pleas, courts have assumed jurisdiction over alleged foreign price ixing conspiracies: R v BASF Aktiengesellschaft ......
-
Saskatchewan Power Corporation v Mitsubishi Power Canada Ltd.,
...First, in Lapointe Rosenstein Marchand Melançon LLP v Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP., 2016 SCC 30 at para 34, [2016] 1 SCR 851 [Lapointe], the Supreme Court held that the real and substantial connection test is not concerned with showing the strongest possible connection between th......
Request a trial to view additional results
24 cases
-
Sharp v Autorité des marchés financiers,
...(Trustee of), [1999] 3 S.C.R. 375; Lapointe Rosenstein Marchand Melançon LLP v. Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, 2016 SCC 30, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 851; Autorité des marchés financiers v. Fournier, 2012 QCCA 1179; Donaldson v. Autorité des marchés financiers, 2020 QCCA ......
-
Sharp v. Autorité des marchés financiers, 2023 SCC 29
...(Trustee of), [1999] 3 S.C.R. 375; Lapointe Rosenstein Marchand Melançon LLP v. Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, 2016 SCC 30, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 851; Autorité des marchés financiers v. Fournier, 2012 QCCA 1179; Donaldson v. Autorité des marchés financiers, 2020 QCCA ......
-
Saskatchewan Power Corporation v Mitsubishi Power Canada Ltd.,
...First, in Lapointe Rosenstein Marchand Melançon LLP v Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP., 2016 SCC 30 at para 34, [2016] 1 SCR 851 [Lapointe], the Supreme Court held that the real and substantial connection test is not concerned with showing the strongest possible connection between th......
-
Macdonald v Burke, 2018 ABQB 534
...jurisdiction. Master Prowse also referred to Lapointe Rosenstein Marchand Melancon LLP v Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, 2016 SCC 30, [2016] 1 SCR 851, to deal with the real and substantial connection test. In his decision, Master Prowse said this at paragraph 15: The contract between TC......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...248 Lapointe Rosenstein Marchand Melançon LLP v Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, [2016] 1 SCR 851 ................................................................ 302 Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc v PSKS Inc, 551 US 877 (2007) ............. 459 Lin v Airbnb, Inc, 2019 FC 1563 ...............
-
Agreements Between Competitors
...connection test,” see, e.g., R v Libman , [1985] 2 SCR 178; Lapointe Rosenstein Marchand Melançon LLP v Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP , [2016] 1 SCR 851. In the case of guilty pleas, courts have assumed jurisdiction over alleged foreign price ixing conspiracies: R v BASF Aktiengesellschaft ......