Legacy Inc. v Red Deer (City), 2018 ABCA 393
| Judge | Thomas W. Wakeling |
| Citation | 2018 ABCA 393 |
| Docket Number | 1803-0143-AC |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 26 November 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 practice notes
-
Cartwright v Rocky View County Subdivision and Development Appeal Board, 2020 ABCA 408
...or technical irregularity and that no substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has occurred”. See Legacy, Inc. v. City of Red Deer, 2018 ABCA 393, ¶¶ 108-11; 81 M.P.L.R. 5th 181 (chambers) (“The Court grants Legacy Inc. permission to appeal the following question of law: Did the Board er......
-
Mohr v Strathcona, 2018 ABCA 441
...[14] Appeal 1-2018, ¶ 27. [15] Bylaw 56-2017. [16] Appeal 1-2018, ¶ 32. [17] R.S.A. 2000, c. M-26. [18] Legacy Inc. v. City of Red Deer, 2018 ABCA 393, ¶ 13 (“A court may consider questions that were not set out in the applicant’s initial memorandum of argument or presented to the board if ......
-
Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2022 ABCA 299
...and relatively easy to meet”: Mohr v Strathcona (County), 2018 ABCA 441 at para 38. As stated in Legacy Inc v Red Deer (City), 2018 ABCA 393 at para 64, “[t]he applicant must simply demonstrate that a ground of appeal is arguable, or not [16] ......
-
Ellis v City of Lethbridge,
...the factual record was insufficient to resolve the matter (at paras 58-59). The Respondent also relies on Legacy Inc v Red Deer (City), 2018 ABCA 393 [Legacy Inc] where it was held that new issues may not be raised on appeal because failing to present these issues at earlier stages of litig......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
Cartwright v Rocky View County Subdivision and Development Appeal Board, 2020 ABCA 408
...or technical irregularity and that no substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has occurred”. See Legacy, Inc. v. City of Red Deer, 2018 ABCA 393, ¶¶ 108-11; 81 M.P.L.R. 5th 181 (chambers) (“The Court grants Legacy Inc. permission to appeal the following question of law: Did the Board er......
-
Mohr v Strathcona, 2018 ABCA 441
...[14] Appeal 1-2018, ¶ 27. [15] Bylaw 56-2017. [16] Appeal 1-2018, ¶ 32. [17] R.S.A. 2000, c. M-26. [18] Legacy Inc. v. City of Red Deer, 2018 ABCA 393, ¶ 13 (“A court may consider questions that were not set out in the applicant’s initial memorandum of argument or presented to the board if ......
-
Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2022 ABCA 299
...and relatively easy to meet”: Mohr v Strathcona (County), 2018 ABCA 441 at para 38. As stated in Legacy Inc v Red Deer (City), 2018 ABCA 393 at para 64, “[t]he applicant must simply demonstrate that a ground of appeal is arguable, or not [16] ......
-
Ellis v City of Lethbridge,
...the factual record was insufficient to resolve the matter (at paras 58-59). The Respondent also relies on Legacy Inc v Red Deer (City), 2018 ABCA 393 [Legacy Inc] where it was held that new issues may not be raised on appeal because failing to present these issues at earlier stages of litig......
Get Started for Free