Legacy Inc. v Red Deer (City), 2018 ABCA 393
| Judge | Thomas W. Wakeling |
| Citation | 2018 ABCA 393 |
| Docket Number | 1803-0143-AC |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 26 November 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Cartwright v Rocky View County Subdivision and Development Appeal Board,
...or technical irregularity and that no substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has occurred”. See Legacy, Inc. v. City of Red Deer, 2018 ABCA 393, ¶¶ 108-11; 81 M.P.L.R. 5th 181 (chambers) (“The Court grants Legacy Inc. permission to appeal the following question of law: Did the Board er......
-
Mohr v Strathcona, 2018 ABCA 441
...[14] Appeal 1-2018, ¶ 27. [15] Bylaw 56-2017. [16] Appeal 1-2018, ¶ 32. [17] R.S.A. 2000, c. M-26. [18] Legacy Inc. v. City of Red Deer, 2018 ABCA 393, ¶ 13 (“A court may consider questions that were not set out in the applicant’s initial memorandum of argument or presented to the board if ......
-
Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board),
...and relatively easy to meet”: Mohr v Strathcona (County), 2018 ABCA 441 at para 38. As stated in Legacy Inc v Red Deer (City), 2018 ABCA 393 at para 64, “[t]he applicant must simply demonstrate that a ground of appeal is arguable, or not [16] ......
-
Ellis v City of Lethbridge, 2020 ABQB 783
...the factual record was insufficient to resolve the matter (at paras 58-59). The Respondent also relies on Legacy Inc v Red Deer (City), 2018 ABCA 393 [Legacy Inc] where it was held that new issues may not be raised on appeal because failing to present these issues at earlier stages of litig......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Cartwright v Rocky View County Subdivision and Development Appeal Board,
...or technical irregularity and that no substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has occurred”. See Legacy, Inc. v. City of Red Deer, 2018 ABCA 393, ¶¶ 108-11; 81 M.P.L.R. 5th 181 (chambers) (“The Court grants Legacy Inc. permission to appeal the following question of law: Did the Board er......
-
Mohr v Strathcona, 2018 ABCA 441
...[14] Appeal 1-2018, ¶ 27. [15] Bylaw 56-2017. [16] Appeal 1-2018, ¶ 32. [17] R.S.A. 2000, c. M-26. [18] Legacy Inc. v. City of Red Deer, 2018 ABCA 393, ¶ 13 (“A court may consider questions that were not set out in the applicant’s initial memorandum of argument or presented to the board if ......
-
Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board),
...and relatively easy to meet”: Mohr v Strathcona (County), 2018 ABCA 441 at para 38. As stated in Legacy Inc v Red Deer (City), 2018 ABCA 393 at para 64, “[t]he applicant must simply demonstrate that a ground of appeal is arguable, or not [16] ......
-
Ellis v City of Lethbridge, 2020 ABQB 783
...the factual record was insufficient to resolve the matter (at paras 58-59). The Respondent also relies on Legacy Inc v Red Deer (City), 2018 ABCA 393 [Legacy Inc] where it was held that new issues may not be raised on appeal because failing to present these issues at earlier stages of litig......
Request a trial to view additional results