Legacy Inc. v Red Deer (City)
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Judge | Thomas W. Wakeling |
| Citation | 2018 ABCA 393 |
| Date | 26 November 2018 |
| Docket Number | 1803-0143-AC |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
Cartwright v Rocky View County Subdivision and Development Appeal Board, 2020 ABCA 408
...or technical irregularity and that no substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has occurred”. See Legacy, Inc. v. City of Red Deer, 2018 ABCA 393, ¶¶ 108-11; 81 M.P.L.R. 5th 181 (chambers) (“The Court grants Legacy Inc. permission to appeal the following question of law: Did the Board er......
-
Mohr v Strathcona, 2018 ABCA 441
...[14] Appeal 1-2018, ¶ 27. [15] Bylaw 56-2017. [16] Appeal 1-2018, ¶ 32. [17] R.S.A. 2000, c. M-26. [18] Legacy Inc. v. City of Red Deer, 2018 ABCA 393, ¶ 13 (“A court may consider questions that were not set out in the applicant’s initial memorandum of argument or presented to the board if ......
-
Digiuseppe Interior Design Ltd v St Albert (City)
...(Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2012 ABCA 22 at paras 44–45, 61 Alta LR (5th) 396 (one JA); Legacy Inc. v Red Deer (City), 2018 ABCA 393 at para 61, footnote 39, 79 Alta LR (6th) 1. In that Legacy footnote, Wakeling JA mentions County of Northern Sunrise v De Meyer, 2009 ABCA 20......
-
Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2022 ABCA 299
...and relatively easy to meet”: Mohr v Strathcona (County), 2018 ABCA 441 at para 38. As stated in Legacy Inc v Red Deer (City), 2018 ABCA 393 at para 64, “[t]he applicant must simply demonstrate that a ground of appeal is arguable, or not [16]      ......
Get Started for Free
7 cases
-
Cartwright v Rocky View County Subdivision and Development Appeal Board, 2020 ABCA 408
...or technical irregularity and that no substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has occurred”. See Legacy, Inc. v. City of Red Deer, 2018 ABCA 393, ¶¶ 108-11; 81 M.P.L.R. 5th 181 (chambers) (“The Court grants Legacy Inc. permission to appeal the following question of law: Did the Board er......
-
Mohr v Strathcona, 2018 ABCA 441
...[14] Appeal 1-2018, ¶ 27. [15] Bylaw 56-2017. [16] Appeal 1-2018, ¶ 32. [17] R.S.A. 2000, c. M-26. [18] Legacy Inc. v. City of Red Deer, 2018 ABCA 393, ¶ 13 (“A court may consider questions that were not set out in the applicant’s initial memorandum of argument or presented to the board if ......
-
Digiuseppe Interior Design Ltd v St Albert (City)
...(Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2012 ABCA 22 at paras 44–45, 61 Alta LR (5th) 396 (one JA); Legacy Inc. v Red Deer (City), 2018 ABCA 393 at para 61, footnote 39, 79 Alta LR (6th) 1. In that Legacy footnote, Wakeling JA mentions County of Northern Sunrise v De Meyer, 2009 ABCA 20......
-
Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2022 ABCA 299
...and relatively easy to meet”: Mohr v Strathcona (County), 2018 ABCA 441 at para 38. As stated in Legacy Inc v Red Deer (City), 2018 ABCA 393 at para 64, “[t]he applicant must simply demonstrate that a ground of appeal is arguable, or not [16]      ......
Get Started for Free