Liquid Capital Prairie Corp. v Mainline Industrial Limited Partnership, 2019 SKCA 66

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeOttenbreit,Leurer,Tholl
Citation2019 SKCA 66
Docket NumberCACV3306
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Date26 July 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • Regina Bypass Design Builders v Supreme Steel LP,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • May 26, 2021
    ...services and material on credit to construction projects” (Liquid Capital Prairie Corp. v Mainline Industrial Limited Partnership, 2019 SKCA 66 at para 30, [2019] 11 WWR 310). [115]     In Axcess Capital Partners Inc. v Allsteel Builders (2) Ltd., 2015 SKCA 33, [2......
  • PCL Construction Management Inc. v Saskatoon (City), 2020 SKCA 12
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • February 6, 2020
    ...Utilities Board), 2006 SCC 4 at para 37, [2006] 1 SCR 140, and Liquid Capital Propane Corp. v Mainline Industrial Limited Partnership, 2019 SKCA 66 at para 26, [2019] 11 WWR 310 [Mainline Industrial]). This principle or approach holds that “the words of an Act are to be read in their entire......
  • Thomas v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 67
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • June 3, 2020
    ...Utilities Board), 2006 SCC 4 at para 37, [2006] 1 SCR 140, and Liquid Capital Propane Corp. v Mainline Industrial Limited Partnership, 2019 SKCA 66 at para 26, [2019] 11 WWR 310 [Mainline Industrial]). This principle or approach holds that “the words of an Act are to be read in their entire......
  • GRAN v. NAKONECHNY,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • November 2, 2021
    ...Board), 2006 SCC 4 at para 37, [2006] 1 SCR 140, and Liquid Capital Propane Corp. v Mainline Industrial Limited Partnership, 2019 SKCA 66 at para 26, [2019] 11 WWR 310 [Mainline Industrial]). This principle or approach holds that “the words of an Act are to be read in their enti......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • Regina Bypass Design Builders v Supreme Steel LP,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • May 26, 2021
    ...services and material on credit to construction projects” (Liquid Capital Prairie Corp. v Mainline Industrial Limited Partnership, 2019 SKCA 66 at para 30, [2019] 11 WWR 310). [115]     In Axcess Capital Partners Inc. v Allsteel Builders (2) Ltd., 2015 SKCA 33, [2......
  • PCL Construction Management Inc. v Saskatoon (City), 2020 SKCA 12
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • February 6, 2020
    ...Utilities Board), 2006 SCC 4 at para 37, [2006] 1 SCR 140, and Liquid Capital Propane Corp. v Mainline Industrial Limited Partnership, 2019 SKCA 66 at para 26, [2019] 11 WWR 310 [Mainline Industrial]). This principle or approach holds that “the words of an Act are to be read in their entire......
  • Thomas v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 67
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • June 3, 2020
    ...Utilities Board), 2006 SCC 4 at para 37, [2006] 1 SCR 140, and Liquid Capital Propane Corp. v Mainline Industrial Limited Partnership, 2019 SKCA 66 at para 26, [2019] 11 WWR 310 [Mainline Industrial]). This principle or approach holds that “the words of an Act are to be read in their entire......
  • GRAN v. NAKONECHNY,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • November 2, 2021
    ...Board), 2006 SCC 4 at para 37, [2006] 1 SCR 140, and Liquid Capital Propane Corp. v Mainline Industrial Limited Partnership, 2019 SKCA 66 at para 26, [2019] 11 WWR 310 [Mainline Industrial]). This principle or approach holds that “the words of an Act are to be read in their enti......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT