Longhurst v. Longhurst, [2005] B.C.T.C. 1189 (SC)
| Judge | Bennett, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Case Date | July 18, 2005 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | [2005] B.C.T.C. 1189 (SC);2005 BCSC 1189 |
Longhurst v. Longhurst, [2005] B.C.T.C. 1189 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2005] B.C.T.C. TBEd. AU.060
Frederick Johnathon Longhurst (plaintiff) v. Sandra Louise Longhurst (defendant)
(03225; 2005 BCSC 1189)
Indexed As: Longhurst v. Longhurst
British Columbia Supreme Court
Prince George
Bennett, J.
August 16, 2005.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Family Law - Topic 4014
Divorce - Corollary relief - Maintenance and awards - Awards - To children and children defined - See paragraphs 1 to 29.
Cases Noticed:
Wesemann v. Wesemann (1999), 13 B.C.T.C. 233 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 10].
Farden v. Farden (1993), 48 R.F.L.(3d) 60 (B.C.S.C. Master), refd to. [para. 12].
Darlington v. Darlington (1997), 99 B.C.A.C. 134; 162 W.A.C. 134; 32 R.F.L.(4th) 406 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 14].
W.P.N. v. B.J.N. (2005), 207 B.C.A.C. 76; 341 W.A.C. 76; 2005 BCCA 7, refd to. [para. 15].
Gray v. Gray (1992), 80 Man.R.(2d) 161; 39 R.F.L.(3d) 127 (Q.B. Fam. Div.), refd to. [para. 22].
Lawless v. Asaro, [2003] O.T.C. 560 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 23].
Moore v. Moore (1994), 121 Sask.R. 42 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 24].
Keen v. Keen (1990), 89 Sask.R. 114; 30 R.F.L.(3d) 172 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 25].
Harrison v. Vargek (2002), 164 Man.R.(2d) 74; 28 R.F.L.(5th) 176 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 26].
Counsel:
The plaintiff, Frederick Johnathon Longhurst appeared in person;
The defendant, Sandra Louise Longhurst appeared in person.
This application was heard on July 18, 2005, before Bennett, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on August 16, 2005.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Peterson v. Peterson, (2011) 384 Sask.R. 22 (FD)
...223. And as pointed out by Justice McIntyre, other courts have acted upon this principle, as illustrated by Longhurst v. Longhurst , 2005 BCSC 1189 and the cases referred to therein. His reference to these cases should be seen for what it is: support for the existence of this principle but ......
-
H.L.U. v. R.C.U., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 313
...a finding that he or she qualifies as a child of the marriage at the time the application for support is made: Longhurst v. Longhurst , 2005 BCSC 1189. [77] Where a child is determined to be a child of the marriage, the court must next consider whether the Guidelines Table amount of support......
-
Geran v. Geran, 2008 SKQB 460
...Sask.R. Uned. 270; 2000 SKQB 482 (Fam. Div.), refd to. [para. 15]. Longhurst v. Longhurst, [2005] B.C.T.C. 1189; 141 A.C.W.S.(3d) 787; 2005 BCSC 1189, refd to. [para. Rebenchuk v. Rebenchuk (2007), 212 Man.R.(2d) 261; 389 W.A.C. 261; 35 R.F.L.(6th) 239; 2007 MBCA 22, refd to. [para. 23]. Fr......
-
Geran v Geran,
...v. Stocchero, [1997] A.R. Uned. 168; 29 R.F.L.(4th) 223 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 39]. Longhurst v. Longhurst, [2005] B.C.T.C. 1189; 2005 BCSC 1189, refd to. [para. Dergousoff v. Dergousoff (1999), 177 Sask.R. 64; 199 W.A.C. 64; 48 R.F.L.(4th) 1 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 56]. Francis v. Baker, ......
-
Peterson v. Peterson, (2011) 384 Sask.R. 22 (FD)
...223. And as pointed out by Justice McIntyre, other courts have acted upon this principle, as illustrated by Longhurst v. Longhurst , 2005 BCSC 1189 and the cases referred to therein. His reference to these cases should be seen for what it is: support for the existence of this principle but ......
-
H.L.U. v. R.C.U., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 313
...a finding that he or she qualifies as a child of the marriage at the time the application for support is made: Longhurst v. Longhurst , 2005 BCSC 1189. [77] Where a child is determined to be a child of the marriage, the court must next consider whether the Guidelines Table amount of support......
-
Geran v. Geran, 2008 SKQB 460
...Sask.R. Uned. 270; 2000 SKQB 482 (Fam. Div.), refd to. [para. 15]. Longhurst v. Longhurst, [2005] B.C.T.C. 1189; 141 A.C.W.S.(3d) 787; 2005 BCSC 1189, refd to. [para. Rebenchuk v. Rebenchuk (2007), 212 Man.R.(2d) 261; 389 W.A.C. 261; 35 R.F.L.(6th) 239; 2007 MBCA 22, refd to. [para. 23]. Fr......
-
Geran v Geran,
...v. Stocchero, [1997] A.R. Uned. 168; 29 R.F.L.(4th) 223 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 39]. Longhurst v. Longhurst, [2005] B.C.T.C. 1189; 2005 BCSC 1189, refd to. [para. Dergousoff v. Dergousoff (1999), 177 Sask.R. 64; 199 W.A.C. 64; 48 R.F.L.(4th) 1 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 56]. Francis v. Baker, ......
-
Definitions of 'child of the marriage'; adult children; obligation of de facto parent
...C.A.); Renouf v. Bertol-Renouf ,[2004]A.J.No.1402 (Q.B.); Jonasson v. Jonasson ,[1998]B.C.J.No. 726(S.C.); Longhurst v. Longhurst , 2005 BCSC 1189; Horvath v. Horvath ,[2000]M.J.No. 428(C.A.); Pritchard v. Pritchard (1991), 38 R.F.L. (3d) 45 (N.S. Fam. Ct.); F.(R.L.) v. F.(S.) (1996), 26 R.......
-
Table of cases
...No. 1637, 2004 BCSC 1017............................................................. 41 Longhurst v. Longhurst, [2005] B.C.J. No. 1829, 2005 BCSC 1189.............................................................68 Loos v. Schneider, [2004] S.J. No. 38, 244 Sask. R. 298 (Q.B.)....................
-
Definitions of 'Child of the Marriage'; Adult Children; Obligation of De Facto Parent
...v. Major , [2005] O.J. No. 3086 (Div. Ct.). 334 Stocchero v. Stocchero (1997), 29 R.F.L. (4th) 223 (Alta. C.A.); Longhurst v. Longhurst , 2005 BCSC 1189; Horvath v. Horvath , [2000] M.J. No. 428 (C.A.); Pritchard v. Pritchard (1991), 38 R.F.L. (3d) 45 (N.S. Fam. Ct.); F.(R.L.) v. F.(S.) (19......
-
Table of cases
...[2004] B.C.J. No. 1637, 2004 BCSC 1017 .......................................... 41 Longhurst v. Longhurst, [2005] B.C.J. No. 1829, 2005 BCSC 1189 .......................................... 84 Longlitz v. Longlitz, 2012 BCSC 130 ...................................................................