LR v Semenjuk, 2020 ABQB 350

JudgeHonourable Madam Justice M.E. Burns
Citation2020 ABQB 350
Docket Number0803 15090
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Date29 May 2020

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 practice notes
  • KY v Bahler,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 8 Mayo 2023
    ...assumptions about the relationship capacities of people with cognitive limitations. Justice Burns wrote as follows in LR v Semenjuk, 2020 ABQB 350, affd 2021 ABCA 318 at para 170(QB): [170] It is asserted that individuals with cognitive limitations are less desirable to prospective partners......
  • Wetaskiwin Animal Clinic Ltd v Hartley, 2021 ABQB 144
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 23 Febrero 2021
    ...[1956] SCR 991; ter Neuzen v Korn, [1995] 3 SCR 674 at paras 33, 36 and 61; Zaiffdeen v Chua, 2005 ABCA 290 at para 22; LR v Semenjuk, 2020 ABQB 350 at para 23 [LR]; Barbe v Evans, 2020 ABQB 599 at para 171; Waap v Alberta, 2008 ABQB 544 at para 33. [47] The Court determines the requirement......
  • LR v Semenjuk,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 23 Septiembre 2021
    ...Judgment Appeal from the Judgment by The Honourable Justice M.E. Burns Dated the 29th day of May, 2020 Filed the 29th day of May, 2020 (2020 ABQB 350, Docket: 0803 _______________________________________________________ Memorandum of Judgment ________________________________________________......
  • Roshan-Moniri v. Dr. Herbert Y.C. Chang Inc. (Tri-City Family Practice),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 9 Febrero 2022
    ...fact. [141]     The defendant relied on a decision from the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench, L.R. v. Semenjuk, 2020 ABQB 350, where a young person sued his family doctor and pediatrician for failing to make a timely diagnosis of obstructive hydrocephalus (an excess......
  • Get Started for Free
5 cases
  • KY v Bahler,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 8 Mayo 2023
    ...assumptions about the relationship capacities of people with cognitive limitations. Justice Burns wrote as follows in LR v Semenjuk, 2020 ABQB 350, affd 2021 ABCA 318 at para 170(QB): [170] It is asserted that individuals with cognitive limitations are less desirable to prospective partners......
  • Wetaskiwin Animal Clinic Ltd v Hartley,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 23 Febrero 2021
    ...[1956] SCR 991; ter Neuzen v Korn, [1995] 3 SCR 674 at paras 33, 36 and 61; Zaiffdeen v Chua, 2005 ABCA 290 at para 22; LR v Semenjuk, 2020 ABQB 350 at para 23 [LR]; Barbe v Evans, 2020 ABQB 599 at para 171; Waap v Alberta, 2008 ABQB 544 at para 33. [47] The Court determines the requirement......
  • LR v Semenjuk,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 23 Septiembre 2021
    ...Judgment Appeal from the Judgment by The Honourable Justice M.E. Burns Dated the 29th day of May, 2020 Filed the 29th day of May, 2020 (2020 ABQB 350, Docket: 0803 _______________________________________________________ Memorandum of Judgment ________________________________________________......
  • Roshan-Moniri v. Dr. Herbert Y.C. Chang Inc. (Tri-City Family Practice),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 9 Febrero 2022
    ...fact. [141]     The defendant relied on a decision from the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench, L.R. v. Semenjuk, 2020 ABQB 350, where a young person sued his family doctor and pediatrician for failing to make a timely diagnosis of obstructive hydrocephalus (an excess......
  • Get Started for Free