Lu v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 175
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Russell, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE,FAMILY LAW,CIVIL RIGHTS |
| Citation | 2016 FC 175 |
| Date | 09 February 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Arshad v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 510
...decision has no line of analysis that leads from the evidence to the conclusion (Lu v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 175 [Lu]). [23] Third, relying on this Court’s decision in Phyang v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 81 at paragraph 20, t......
-
Pu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 600
...standard of correctness (Ngyuen v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 27 at para 20; Lu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 175 at para 14). IV. [14] I will address each of the Applicant’s arguments in turn. i. Remorse [15] The Applicant first argues that the IAD erred......
-
Veliz Balcarcel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...[22] The Applicant says the Decision below is similar to that found to be unreasonable in Lu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 175 [Russell J], in the same context where the sponsorship was barred under paragraph 117(9)(d) of the Regulations. There the Court found the officer ......
-
Cao v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 597
...of the applicants’ H&C application as the burden of proof rests on the applicants (see Lu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 175 at para [28] The Officer did not err in his assessment of the evidence and of the various factors relevant to the BIOC analysis. JUDGMENT in IMM-......
4 cases
-
Arshad v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 510
...decision has no line of analysis that leads from the evidence to the conclusion (Lu v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 175 [Lu]). [23] Third, relying on this Court’s decision in Phyang v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 81 at paragraph 20, t......
-
Pu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 600
...standard of correctness (Ngyuen v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 27 at para 20; Lu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 175 at para 14). IV. [14] I will address each of the Applicant’s arguments in turn. i. Remorse [15] The Applicant first argues that the IAD erred......
-
Veliz Balcarcel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...[22] The Applicant says the Decision below is similar to that found to be unreasonable in Lu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 175 [Russell J], in the same context where the sponsorship was barred under paragraph 117(9)(d) of the Regulations. There the Court found the officer ......
-
Cao v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 597
...of the applicants’ H&C application as the burden of proof rests on the applicants (see Lu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 175 at para [28] The Officer did not err in his assessment of the evidence and of the various factors relevant to the BIOC analysis. JUDGMENT in IMM-......