Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Canada | +1 (343) 700 0450

Lux v. Lux, 2019 ABCA 95

Document Cited authorities 4 Cited in 5 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JudgeKhullar
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Case DateMarch 14, 2019
JurisdictionAlberta
Citations2019 ABCA 95
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Ozark Resources Ltd v TERIC Power Ltd, 2020 ABCA 51
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 5, 2020
    ...Program), 2014 ABCA 448 at para 4; Al-Ghamdi v Alberta, 2016 ABCA 324 at para 8; Clark v Pezzente, 2017 ABCA 220 at para 6; Lux v Lux, 2019 ABCA 95 at para 8; Frydman v Pelletier, 2016 ABCA 98 at para 5. [49] Other factors have also been identified, including the reason the appeal was struc......
  • AE v Alberta (Child Welfare), 2019 ABCA 435
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • November 14, 2019
    ...Alberta (Maintenance Enforcement Program), 2014 ABCA 448; Al-Ghamdi v Alberta, 2016 ABCA 324; Clark v Pezzente, 2017 ABCA 220; Lux v Lux, 2019 ABCA 95. She concluded that there are five relevant factors. Stated in their short form, they are as (a) Arguable merit to the appeal; (b) An explan......
  • Parker v Parker, 2019 ABCA 300
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • August 9, 2019
    ...Plan No 982 6403 v CPI Crown Properties International Corporation, 2018 ABCA 232 at para 11, 76 Alta LR (6th) 318 (CPI); Lux v Lux, 2019 ABCA 95: 1. Arguable merit; 2. Explanation for the delay that caused the appeal to struck; 3. Reasonable promptness in moving to cure the defect and have ......
  • Easton v Stevens,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 7, 2022
    ...All factors must be weighed to determine if it is in the interests of justice to permit the appeal to be restored: Lux v Lux, 2019 ABCA 95 [Lux] at paras [4]               Ms Stevens fairly focuses her opposition on the m......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Ozark Resources Ltd v TERIC Power Ltd, 2020 ABCA 51
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 5, 2020
    ...Program), 2014 ABCA 448 at para 4; Al-Ghamdi v Alberta, 2016 ABCA 324 at para 8; Clark v Pezzente, 2017 ABCA 220 at para 6; Lux v Lux, 2019 ABCA 95 at para 8; Frydman v Pelletier, 2016 ABCA 98 at para 5. [49] Other factors have also been identified, including the reason the appeal was struc......
  • AE v Alberta (Child Welfare), 2019 ABCA 435
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • November 14, 2019
    ...Alberta (Maintenance Enforcement Program), 2014 ABCA 448; Al-Ghamdi v Alberta, 2016 ABCA 324; Clark v Pezzente, 2017 ABCA 220; Lux v Lux, 2019 ABCA 95. She concluded that there are five relevant factors. Stated in their short form, they are as (a) Arguable merit to the appeal; (b) An explan......
  • Parker v Parker, 2019 ABCA 300
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • August 9, 2019
    ...Plan No 982 6403 v CPI Crown Properties International Corporation, 2018 ABCA 232 at para 11, 76 Alta LR (6th) 318 (CPI); Lux v Lux, 2019 ABCA 95: 1. Arguable merit; 2. Explanation for the delay that caused the appeal to struck; 3. Reasonable promptness in moving to cure the defect and have ......
  • Easton v Stevens,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 7, 2022
    ...All factors must be weighed to determine if it is in the interests of justice to permit the appeal to be restored: Lux v Lux, 2019 ABCA 95 [Lux] at paras [4]               Ms Stevens fairly focuses her opposition on the m......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT