Ozark Resources Ltd v TERIC Power Ltd, 2020 ABCA 51
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice Jolaine Antonio |
| Citation | 2020 ABCA 51 |
| Docket Number | 1901-0396-AC |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 05 February 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 practice notes
-
Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2020 ABCA 366
...of Part J.3(a)(ii), and the rationales supporting it, apply equally to rule 14.5(1)(b): Ozark Resources Ltd v Teric Power Ltd, 2020 ABCA 51 at para 31. What constitutes a “pre-trial decision respecting adjournments, time periods or time limits” has been broadly interpreted: Ozark at para 32......
-
Esfahani v Samimi,
...decision, in part because of the highly deferential standard of review that is applied: Ozark Resources Ltd v TERIC Power Ltd, 2020 ABCA 51 at paras. 28-29, 43, 49 CPC (8th) 227. Further, these sorts of interlocutory decisions may not have any substantive impact on the rights of the parties......
-
Rahmani v 959630 Alberta Ltd.,
...if an appeal is a serious question of general importance and has a reasonable chance of success: Ozark Resources v TERIC Power Ltd, 2020 ABCA 51 at paras 33-34. [27] Weidner Investment argues that the appeal is about procedural fairness, that the parties were caught off-guard by the procedu......
-
Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board),
...undue prejudice: Keeder v AlGendy, 2020 ABCA 420 at para 12; Rai v Sandhu, 2020 ABCA 346 at para 3; Ozark Resources Ltd v TERIC Power Ltd, 2020 ABCA 51 at para 34; Thompson v Procrane Inc (Sterling Crane), 2016 ABCA 71 at para 7. [21] &#x......
Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
-
Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2020 ABCA 366
...of Part J.3(a)(ii), and the rationales supporting it, apply equally to rule 14.5(1)(b): Ozark Resources Ltd v Teric Power Ltd, 2020 ABCA 51 at para 31. What constitutes a “pre-trial decision respecting adjournments, time periods or time limits” has been broadly interpreted: Ozark at para 32......
-
Esfahani v Samimi,
...decision, in part because of the highly deferential standard of review that is applied: Ozark Resources Ltd v TERIC Power Ltd, 2020 ABCA 51 at paras. 28-29, 43, 49 CPC (8th) 227. Further, these sorts of interlocutory decisions may not have any substantive impact on the rights of the parties......
-
Rahmani v 959630 Alberta Ltd.,
...if an appeal is a serious question of general importance and has a reasonable chance of success: Ozark Resources v TERIC Power Ltd, 2020 ABCA 51 at paras 33-34. [27] Weidner Investment argues that the appeal is about procedural fairness, that the parties were caught off-guard by the procedu......
-
Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board),
...undue prejudice: Keeder v AlGendy, 2020 ABCA 420 at para 12; Rai v Sandhu, 2020 ABCA 346 at para 3; Ozark Resources Ltd v TERIC Power Ltd, 2020 ABCA 51 at para 34; Thompson v Procrane Inc (Sterling Crane), 2016 ABCA 71 at para 7. [21] &#x......
Request a trial to view additional results