Lymer (Re), 2020 ABQB 157
| Judge | L.A. Smart |
| Docket Number | BE03 446521 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 28 February 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167
...is not the obvious remedy for contempt. The fundamental question for the Objecting Creditors is: “Where did the money go?”: Lymer (Re), 2020 ABQB 157 at para. 48. A vexatious litigant order is not going to generate the answer to that question. A vexatious litigant order cannot make a litiga......
-
Thrive Capital Management Ltd. v. Noble 1324 Queen Inc.,
...through their disclosure is: where did the money go?: Jonsson v. Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167, 7 Alta. L.R. (7th) 146, at para. 56; Lymer (Re), 2020 ABQB 157, at para. 48. [20] Paragraph 81 of the Second Sentencing Decision summarized what......
2 cases
-
Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167
...is not the obvious remedy for contempt. The fundamental question for the Objecting Creditors is: “Where did the money go?”: Lymer (Re), 2020 ABQB 157 at para. 48. A vexatious litigant order is not going to generate the answer to that question. A vexatious litigant order cannot make a litiga......
-
Thrive Capital Management Ltd. v. Noble 1324 Queen Inc.,
...through their disclosure is: where did the money go?: Jonsson v. Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167, 7 Alta. L.R. (7th) 146, at para. 56; Lymer (Re), 2020 ABQB 157, at para. 48. [20] Paragraph 81 of the Second Sentencing Decision summarized what......