Mainstream Can. v. Staniford, [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1691

JudgeAdair, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateJanuary 18, 2012
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1691;2012 BCSC 1691;[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1691 (SC)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Hudson v. Myong, 2020 BCSC 517
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 2, 2020
    ...is this sting which the defendant must establish as either true or the subject of a fair comment defence: Mainstream Canada v. Staniford, 2012 BCSC 1691 at para. 6. When the statements make reference to other statements including, for example, the defendant’s November 2, 2017 open letter po......
  • Mainstream Canada v. Staniford, [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1923
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 19, 2012
    ...to amend the Response to Civil Claim to plead lesser included meanings. I also dismissed this application (my reasons are indexed at 2012 BCSC 1691). It was, indeed, "déjà vu all over again," given Mr. Staniford's experience in the litigation brought against him by Creative Salmon Company L......
2 cases
  • Hudson v. Myong, 2020 BCSC 517
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 2, 2020
    ...is this sting which the defendant must establish as either true or the subject of a fair comment defence: Mainstream Canada v. Staniford, 2012 BCSC 1691 at para. 6. When the statements make reference to other statements including, for example, the defendant’s November 2, 2017 open letter po......
  • Mainstream Canada v. Staniford, [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1923
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 19, 2012
    ...to amend the Response to Civil Claim to plead lesser included meanings. I also dismissed this application (my reasons are indexed at 2012 BCSC 1691). It was, indeed, "déjà vu all over again," given Mr. Staniford's experience in the litigation brought against him by Creative Salmon Company L......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT