Majebi et al. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 14
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Fothergill, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | STATUTES,PRACTICE,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,EVIDENCE,CIVIL RIGHTS |
| Citation | 2016 FC 14 |
| Date | 07 January 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Sanmugalingam v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 200
...have been provided earlier and which was not probative, was justified. [53] In Majebi v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2016 FC 14, [2016] FCJ No 12, Justice Fothergill found the RAD's rejection of new evidence to be reasonable, where it found that the evidence could have......
-
Rehman v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 783
...of whether new evidence is admissible is reviewable on the standard of reasonableness (Ajebi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 14 at para 15; Singh at paras 22-30; Khachatourian v Canada (Citizenship and Immigrations), 2015 FC 182 at para 37; Denis v Canada (Citizenship and Im......
-
Hassan v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2019 FC 459
...obtained the additional letters from other Canadian Somali associations. [21] As I held in Majebi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 14 [1] at paragraph 19: […] The flexible approach described in Singh concerns the admissibility of evidence only after the threshold requirements......
-
Gelle v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1710
...the latter admission criteria of credibility and reliability can be flexibly interpreted (Majebi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 14 at para 19). The RAD’s reasons for finding that the statutory requirement is not met are intelligible and transparent in that they show ......
4 cases
-
Sanmugalingam v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 200
...have been provided earlier and which was not probative, was justified. [53] In Majebi v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2016 FC 14, [2016] FCJ No 12, Justice Fothergill found the RAD's rejection of new evidence to be reasonable, where it found that the evidence could have......
-
Rehman v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 783
...of whether new evidence is admissible is reviewable on the standard of reasonableness (Ajebi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 14 at para 15; Singh at paras 22-30; Khachatourian v Canada (Citizenship and Immigrations), 2015 FC 182 at para 37; Denis v Canada (Citizenship and Im......
-
Hassan v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2019 FC 459
...obtained the additional letters from other Canadian Somali associations. [21] As I held in Majebi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 14 [1] at paragraph 19: […] The flexible approach described in Singh concerns the admissibility of evidence only after the threshold requirements......
-
Gelle v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1710
...the latter admission criteria of credibility and reliability can be flexibly interpreted (Majebi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 14 at para 19). The RAD’s reasons for finding that the statutory requirement is not met are intelligible and transparent in that they show ......