MAK v TJK, 2020 ABCA 196

JudgeThe Honourable Madam Justice Myra Bielby; The Honourable Madam Justice Michelle Crighton; The Honourable Mr. Justice Kevin Feehan
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Case DateMay 12, 2020
JurisdictionAlberta
Citations2020 ABCA 196
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 practice notes
  • TAM v MOG,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 1 Septiembre 2021
    ...A decision may also be re-opened if the test for the admission of new evidence is satisfied. In MAK v TJK, 2020 ABCA 196 at para 12, the Alberta Court of Appeal adopted the following statement of the test as articulated in Scott et al v Cook et al, [1970] 2 OR 769, 1970 CanLII 331 (Ont SC) ......
  • Gunston v MacDonald,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 17 Diciembre 2021
    ...very least, a consideration of s 8 factors clearly raised by the parties. [64]        In MAK v TJK, 2020 ABCA 196, at paras 41 to 45, the Alberta Court of Appeal discussed the presumption of equal division of matrimonial property and reiterated that unequa......
  • Rolinger v Rolinger,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 17 Junio 2021
    ...and Mister Sod ($42,000 to $57,000)), we have another disclosure shortfall. [84]        In MAK v TJK, 2020 ABCA 196, the Court of Appeal endorsed Bercov J.’s approach to amortization add-backs in the face of “internally inconsistent [amortiza......
  • Nolt-Leverton v Leverton,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 29 Mayo 2023
    ...property is divided as of the date of trial: Stuve v Stuve, 2019 ABCA 142 at para 10. C. Presumption of Equal Division 12 In MAK v TJK, 2020 ABCA 196, the Court of Appeal confirmed the importance of the presumption of equal division when applying the s. 8 factors, writing as follows at para......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • TAM v MOG,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 1 Septiembre 2021
    ...A decision may also be re-opened if the test for the admission of new evidence is satisfied. In MAK v TJK, 2020 ABCA 196 at para 12, the Alberta Court of Appeal adopted the following statement of the test as articulated in Scott et al v Cook et al, [1970] 2 OR 769, 1970 CanLII 331 (Ont SC) ......
  • Gunston v MacDonald,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 17 Diciembre 2021
    ...very least, a consideration of s 8 factors clearly raised by the parties. [64]        In MAK v TJK, 2020 ABCA 196, at paras 41 to 45, the Alberta Court of Appeal discussed the presumption of equal division of matrimonial property and reiterated that unequa......
  • Rolinger v Rolinger,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 17 Junio 2021
    ...and Mister Sod ($42,000 to $57,000)), we have another disclosure shortfall. [84]        In MAK v TJK, 2020 ABCA 196, the Court of Appeal endorsed Bercov J.’s approach to amortization add-backs in the face of “internally inconsistent [amortiza......
  • Nolt-Leverton v Leverton,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 29 Mayo 2023
    ...property is divided as of the date of trial: Stuve v Stuve, 2019 ABCA 142 at para 10. C. Presumption of Equal Division 12 In MAK v TJK, 2020 ABCA 196, the Court of Appeal confirmed the importance of the presumption of equal division when applying the s. 8 factors, writing as follows at para......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT