MAK v TJK, 2020 ABCA 196
Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Myra Bielby; The Honourable Madam Justice Michelle Crighton; The Honourable Mr. Justice Kevin Feehan |
Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
Case Date | May 12, 2020 |
Jurisdiction | Alberta |
Citations | 2020 ABCA 196 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
TAM v MOG,
...A decision may also be re-opened if the test for the admission of new evidence is satisfied. In MAK v TJK, 2020 ABCA 196 at para 12, the Alberta Court of Appeal adopted the following statement of the test as articulated in Scott et al v Cook et al, [1970] 2 OR 769, 1970 CanLII 331 (Ont SC) ......
-
Gunston v MacDonald,
...very least, a consideration of s 8 factors clearly raised by the parties. [64] In MAK v TJK, 2020 ABCA 196, at paras 41 to 45, the Alberta Court of Appeal discussed the presumption of equal division of matrimonial property and reiterated that unequa......
-
Rolinger v Rolinger,
...and Mister Sod ($42,000 to $57,000)), we have another disclosure shortfall. [84] In MAK v TJK, 2020 ABCA 196, the Court of Appeal endorsed Bercov J.’s approach to amortization add-backs in the face of “internally inconsistent [amortiza......
-
Nolt-Leverton v Leverton,
...property is divided as of the date of trial: Stuve v Stuve, 2019 ABCA 142 at para 10. C. Presumption of Equal Division 12 In MAK v TJK, 2020 ABCA 196, the Court of Appeal confirmed the importance of the presumption of equal division when applying the s. 8 factors, writing as follows at para......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
TAM v MOG,
...A decision may also be re-opened if the test for the admission of new evidence is satisfied. In MAK v TJK, 2020 ABCA 196 at para 12, the Alberta Court of Appeal adopted the following statement of the test as articulated in Scott et al v Cook et al, [1970] 2 OR 769, 1970 CanLII 331 (Ont SC) ......
-
Gunston v MacDonald,
...very least, a consideration of s 8 factors clearly raised by the parties. [64] In MAK v TJK, 2020 ABCA 196, at paras 41 to 45, the Alberta Court of Appeal discussed the presumption of equal division of matrimonial property and reiterated that unequa......
-
Rolinger v Rolinger,
...and Mister Sod ($42,000 to $57,000)), we have another disclosure shortfall. [84] In MAK v TJK, 2020 ABCA 196, the Court of Appeal endorsed Bercov J.’s approach to amortization add-backs in the face of “internally inconsistent [amortiza......
-
Nolt-Leverton v Leverton,
...property is divided as of the date of trial: Stuve v Stuve, 2019 ABCA 142 at para 10. C. Presumption of Equal Division 12 In MAK v TJK, 2020 ABCA 196, the Court of Appeal confirmed the importance of the presumption of equal division when applying the s. 8 factors, writing as follows at para......
Request a trial to view additional results