Matsika v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 602
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2019 FC 602 |
| Date | 07 May 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 179
...the Applicant (see Kaur v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 1379 at para 50; Matsika v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 602 at para 23). [21] For these reasons, I am dismissing the application for judicial review. [22] There is no question of general importance for ......
-
Salcedo Sanchez v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2019 FC 1037
...of reasonableness applies to the RPD’s findings of fact and of mixed fact and law (Matsika v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 602 at para 11). [24] It is well-established that the RPD does not need to mention every piece of evidence in its decisions (Newfoundland a......
2 cases
-
Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 179
...the Applicant (see Kaur v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 1379 at para 50; Matsika v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 602 at para 23). [21] For these reasons, I am dismissing the application for judicial review. [22] There is no question of general importance for ......
-
Salcedo Sanchez v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2019 FC 1037
...of reasonableness applies to the RPD’s findings of fact and of mixed fact and law (Matsika v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 602 at para 11). [24] It is well-established that the RPD does not need to mention every piece of evidence in its decisions (Newfoundland a......