McCorriston v Hunter
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Judge | Richards C.J.S., Whitmore and Leurer JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2019 SKCA 106 |
| Date | 17 October 2019 |
| Docket Number | CACV3349 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
29 practice notes
-
Stromberg v Olafson
...to ensure that it is achieved, is reflected in the following observations by Leurer J.A., quoting Hryniak, in McCorriston v Hunter, 2019 SKCA 106, 33 RFL (8th) 310 [McCorriston]: [23] … Rule 7-5(1) allows for summary judgment where “the Court is satisfied that there is no genuine issue requ......
-
Morin v. Saskatchewan Government Insurance
...In Seewalt, Schwann J.A. states as follows: [27] This Court, in McCorriston v Hunter, 2019 SKCA 106, 33 RFL (8th) 310, expanded on the idea that, in considering whether the summary judgment as a process is suitable in any given case, the judge hearing the......
-
MILLER v. SASKATCHEWAN AND ARBORFIELD CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT AREA AUTHORITY
...… [27] Finally, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal recently provided a helpful overview of the principles at play in McCorriston v Hunter, 2019 SKCA 106. Leurer J.A. clarified that while the application of the process may appear daunting and cyclical, the heart of the analysis remains upon th......
-
B.P.T.F. v. J.H.
...evidence can all too easily obscure the truth or reveal only parts of it. As Leurer J.A. observed in McCorriston [McCorriston v Hunter 2019 SKCA 106] at paragraph 25, “[a]n affidavit is the ultimate form of leading a witness”. All of this means that, in order to properly respect and account......
Get Started for Free
25 cases
-
MILLER v. SASKATCHEWAN AND ARBORFIELD CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT AREA AUTHORITY
...… [27] Finally, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal recently provided a helpful overview of the principles at play in McCorriston v Hunter, 2019 SKCA 106. Leurer J.A. clarified that while the application of the process may appear daunting and cyclical, the heart of the analysis remains upon th......
-
B.P.T.F. v. J.H.
...evidence can all too easily obscure the truth or reveal only parts of it. As Leurer J.A. observed in McCorriston [McCorriston v Hunter 2019 SKCA 106] at paragraph 25, “[a]n affidavit is the ultimate form of leading a witness”. All of this means that, in order to properly respect and account......
-
T.S. v. J.B.
...a trial, taking into account the issues in dispute and principles of proportionality: T.C. v A.E., at para 31; McCorriston v Hunter, 2019 SKCA 106, 33 RFL (8th) 310; and Greyeyes, at paras 20‑21. [34]           &#x......
-
S.B. v. S.H.
...In McCorriston v Hunter, 2019 SKCA 106, 33 RFL (8th) 310 [McCorriston], Leurer J.A. provides this helpful [44]  ... the existence of a “genuine issue” is seldom in dispute. Instead, in most cases, the issue at large when a motion for summary judgment is presented is wheth......
Get Started for Free