McVea v. T.B. et al., 2002 BCSC 1407

JudgeLynn Smith, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateOctober 03, 2002
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2002 BCSC 1407;[2002] B.C.T.C. 1407 (SC)

McVea v. T.B., [2002] B.C.T.C. 1407 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2002] B.C.T.C. TBEd. OC.048

Aidan David McVea and Saige La-Tesia McVea, infants by their Guardian Ad Litem, Aidan McVea and the said Aidan McVea (plaintiffs) v. T.B., Donald Fred McLaughlin and the Attorney General of British Columbia (defendants) and the Attorney General of British Columbia, A.S. and Christopher McBryan (third parties)

(C966558; 2002 BCSC 1407)

Indexed As: McVea v. T.B. et al.

British Columbia Supreme Court

Vancouver

Lynn Smith, J.

October 3, 2002.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Damage Awards - Topic 84

Injury and death - Wrongful death and fatal accidents - Mother and wife - See paragraphs 48 to 80.

Damages - Topic 2117

Torts causing death - Method of assessment of value of the dependency (lump sum) - Contingencies (incl. remarriage) - See paragraphs 48 to 80.

Damages - Topic 2258

Torts causing death - Calculation of value of particular dependencies - Father and children dependent upon mother - See paragraphs 48 to 80.

Damages - Topic 2377

Torts causing death - Particular damage claims - Loss of parent's guidance and support - See paragraphs 48 to 80.

Damages - Topic 2378

Torts causing death - Particular damage claims - Loss of guidance, care and companionship - See paragraphs 48 to 80.

Damages - Topic 2384

Torts causing death - Particular damage claims - Loss of future income - See paragraphs 48 to 80.

Cases Noticed:

Kwok v. British Columbia Ferry Corp. (1987), 20 B.C.L.R.(2d) 318 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 37].

Ruiz et al. v. Mount Saint Joseph Hospital et al. (2001), 150 B.C.A.C. 161; 245 W.A.C. 161 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 48].

Keizer v. Hanna and Buch (1978), 19 N.R. 209; 82 D.L.R.(3d) 449 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 49].

Skelding et al. v. Skelding (1994), 90 B.C.A.C. 81; 147 W.A.C. 81; 95 B.C.L.R.(2d) 201 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 66].

Plant v. Chadwick (1986), 5 B.C.L.R.(2d) 305 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 69].

Bentley (Guardian ad litem of) v. Bentley, [1994] B.C.J. No. 1118 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 70].

Collins (Guardian ad litem of) v. Savovich (1996), 20 B.C.L.R.(3d) 126 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 70].

Murtack (Guardian ad litem of) v. Kirshenblatt, [1994] B.C.J. No. 1270 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 70].

Bresch (Public trustee of) v. Mallis (1996), 29 C.C.L.T.(2d) 160 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 70].

Michell v. Michell et al., [1998] B.C.T.C. Uned. 749 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 72].

Peacock et al. v. Glynes (1999), 21 B.C.T.C. 1 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 72].

Zapata Estate v. Grunder et al., [2000] B.C.T.C. 149 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 72].

Randall et al. v. Fast et al., [2001] B.C.T.C. 157 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 72].

Smith (Personal representative of) v. Fast - see Randall et al. v. Fast et al.

Friesen et al. v. Hammell et al., [2002] B.C.T.C. 1103 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 82].

JJM Construction Ltd. v. Sandspit Harbour Society et al., [2002] B.C.T.C. 974 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 82].

Counsel:

J.E. Murphy, Q.C., and B. Brooke, for the plaintiffs;

J.D. Baker, Q.C., and C.C. Godwin, for the defendant, T.B.;

H.J. Roberts and V. Hola, for the Attorney General of British Columbia and Christopher McBryan.

This action was heard on June 24 to 28, 2002, at Vancouver, British Columbia, before Lynn Smith, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following reasons for judgment on October 3, 2002.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 practice notes
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Limiting Principles
    • 21 Junio 2014
    ...No 507 (CA) ..........................145, 187, 489–90 McVea (Guardian ad litem of) v TB (2002), 5 BCLR (4th) 367, [2002] BCJ No 2230, 2002 BCSC 1407 ...........................................................212, 216, 219, 223, 230 MD (Guardian ad litem of) v British Columbia, [2000] BCJ N......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Remedies: the Law of Damages. Second Edition Part Three
    • 8 Septiembre 2008
    ...128, 164, 425 McVea (Guardian ad litem of) v. T.B. (2002), 5 B.C.L.R. (4th) 367, [2002] B.C.J. No. 2230, 2002 BCSC 1407 ..................... 186, 190, 193, 197, 203 Mediana, The, [1900] A.C. 113 ...................................................................... 86 – 87 Merk v. I.A.B.S.......
  • THE ESTATE OF MARY FLEURY et al v. OLAYIWOLA A. KASSIM,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 22 Abril 2022
    ...the children were awarded $20,000 each (adjusted to 25,800 in 2021); and  McVea (Guardian ad litem of) v. B(T) Guardian ad item of), 2002 BCSC 1407 where two young children (ages 3 and 5) were awarded $30,000 each (adjusted to $42,000 in 2021). [291]     The Court h......
  • Panghali Estate v. Panghali, 2014 BCSC 647
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 15 Abril 2014
    ...suitable replacement for a parent" ( Plant at 314). As a result, awards under this head are generally conventional: McVea v. T.B. et al , 2002 BCSC 1407, noting that not only is it "impossible to replace a parent, but ... it is impossible (and invidious) to make nice comparisons between one......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • THE ESTATE OF MARY FLEURY et al v. OLAYIWOLA A. KASSIM,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 22 Abril 2022
    ...the children were awarded $20,000 each (adjusted to 25,800 in 2021); and  McVea (Guardian ad litem of) v. B(T) Guardian ad item of), 2002 BCSC 1407 where two young children (ages 3 and 5) were awarded $30,000 each (adjusted to $42,000 in 2021). [291]     The Court h......
  • Panghali Estate v. Panghali, 2014 BCSC 647
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 15 Abril 2014
    ...suitable replacement for a parent" ( Plant at 314). As a result, awards under this head are generally conventional: McVea v. T.B. et al , 2002 BCSC 1407, noting that not only is it "impossible to replace a parent, but ... it is impossible (and invidious) to make nice comparisons between one......
  • Duncan v. Brown et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 153 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 30 Enero 2014
    ...relates to the child's future financial dependency as opposed to a spouses' claim. [127] In McVea (Guardian ad litem of) v. T.B ., 2002 BCSC 1407, Madam Justice L. Smith made no reduction to the awards for future loss of support for Mr. McVea and the McVea children. In that case, Mr. McVea,......
  • Foisy v. Ship Queen of the North, [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1129
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 19 Agosto 2009
    ...children as damages for loss of care, guidance and companionship is likely in the range of $25,000 to $30,000 (see: McVea v. T.B. , 2002 BCSC 1407, [2002] B.C.J. No. 2230). It can be argued that the decision in Wilcox v. Miss Megan (Ship) , 2008 F.C. 506, is authority for the proposition th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Limiting Principles
    • 21 Junio 2014
    ...No 507 (CA) ..........................145, 187, 489–90 McVea (Guardian ad litem of) v TB (2002), 5 BCLR (4th) 367, [2002] BCJ No 2230, 2002 BCSC 1407 ...........................................................212, 216, 219, 223, 230 MD (Guardian ad litem of) v British Columbia, [2000] BCJ N......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Remedies: the Law of Damages. Second Edition Part Three
    • 8 Septiembre 2008
    ...128, 164, 425 McVea (Guardian ad litem of) v. T.B. (2002), 5 B.C.L.R. (4th) 367, [2002] B.C.J. No. 2230, 2002 BCSC 1407 ..................... 186, 190, 193, 197, 203 Mediana, The, [1900] A.C. 113 ...................................................................... 86 – 87 Merk v. I.A.B.S.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT