Milavsky v. Milavsky, 2016 ABQB 410

Subject MatterPRACTICE,EVIDENCE
Citation2016 ABQB 410
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Date21 July 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 3 Marzo 2022
    ...previously “asked and answered” (or the equivalent) is a valid objection: Moser at para 6, relying on Milavsky v Lashyn, 2016 ABQB 410 at para 180, and Allan v Epp, 2018 ABQB 85 at para b.     repetitive and abusive questions have never been allowed: Moser ......
  • Real Estate Council of Alberta v Moser, 2019 ABQB 106
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 19 Febrero 2019
    ...“asked and answered” is a valid objection where the question has actually been both asked and answered: Milavsky v Lashyn, 2016 ABQB 410 at para 180. Assessing whether the objection is raised correctly involves considering the abuse that results from re-hashing an exchange tha......
3 cases
  • Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 3 Marzo 2022
    ...previously “asked and answered” (or the equivalent) is a valid objection: Moser at para 6, relying on Milavsky v Lashyn, 2016 ABQB 410 at para 180, and Allan v Epp, 2018 ABQB 85 at para b.     repetitive and abusive questions have never been allowed: Moser ......
  • Real Estate Council of Alberta v Moser, 2019 ABQB 106
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 19 Febrero 2019
    ...“asked and answered” is a valid objection where the question has actually been both asked and answered: Milavsky v Lashyn, 2016 ABQB 410 at para 180. Assessing whether the objection is raised correctly involves considering the abuse that results from re-hashing an exchange tha......
  • BM v WS,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 19 Marzo 2024
    ...paras. 12-13, 74 Alta LR (2d) 262. [para 27] 15 On this point, see also Elhert v Sailer, 2023 ABCA 371 (para 23). And Milavsky v Lashyn, 2016 ABQB 410 (M. Robertson) (para 16 With the defendant presumably able to obtain copies of her own psychological file from her psychologist, the plainti......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT