Milavsky v. Milavsky, [2015] A.R. Uned. 538 (QB)

JudgeMahoney, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Subject MatterPRACTICE
Citation[2015] A.R. Uned. 538 (QB),[2015] A.R. Uned. 538,2015 ABQB 395
Date19 June 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 practice notes
  • Schell Estate (Re), 2018 ABQB 991
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 5, 2018
    ...hearsay rule are engaged. This will require a trial judge to apply the law to the facts as they emerge at trial: see Milavsky v Milavsky, 2015 ABQB 395 at para [79] There is evidence that at minimum Eileen had a mild cognitive impairment at the time that the 2009 Will was executed. This was......
  • Milavsky v. Milavsky, 2016 ABQB 410
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 21, 2016
    ...have been to the Court of Queen's Bench at least six times on Chambers applications: twice for summary judgment ( 2011 ABQB 342 and 2015 ABQB 395), about removal of Ms. Milavsky's counsel (unreported, February, 2012); about bifurcating damages from liability (unreported 2012); a confidenti......
  • Funk v. Funk, 2016 ABQB 189
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 30, 2016
    ...on prosecuting and defending this claim. [107] In so finding, I am aware of the recent decision of this Court in Milavsky v Milavsky , 2015 ABQB 395, where Mahoney J. noted at para 65: [...] Not only does the evidence before me disclose that material facts and the credibility of key witness......
  • Milavsky v. Milavsky Estate, 2016 ABQB 333
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 17, 2016
    ...for trial. Further background for these files has been set out in five previous court decisions (most recently in Milavsky v Milavsky , 2015 ABQB 395), as well as in the Litigation History requested from the parties and attached as Appendix A. Issues [5] Three issues arise out of the applic......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • Schell Estate (Re), 2018 ABQB 991
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 5, 2018
    ...hearsay rule are engaged. This will require a trial judge to apply the law to the facts as they emerge at trial: see Milavsky v Milavsky, 2015 ABQB 395 at para [79] There is evidence that at minimum Eileen had a mild cognitive impairment at the time that the 2009 Will was executed. This was......
  • Milavsky v. Milavsky, 2016 ABQB 410
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 21, 2016
    ...have been to the Court of Queen's Bench at least six times on Chambers applications: twice for summary judgment ( 2011 ABQB 342 and 2015 ABQB 395), about removal of Ms. Milavsky's counsel (unreported, February, 2012); about bifurcating damages from liability (unreported 2012); a confidenti......
  • Funk v. Funk, 2016 ABQB 189
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 30, 2016
    ...on prosecuting and defending this claim. [107] In so finding, I am aware of the recent decision of this Court in Milavsky v Milavsky , 2015 ABQB 395, where Mahoney J. noted at para 65: [...] Not only does the evidence before me disclose that material facts and the credibility of key witness......
  • Milavsky v. Milavsky Estate, 2016 ABQB 333
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 17, 2016
    ...for trial. Further background for these files has been set out in five previous court decisions (most recently in Milavsky v Milavsky , 2015 ABQB 395), as well as in the Litigation History requested from the parties and attached as Appendix A. Issues [5] Three issues arise out of the applic......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT