Miller Thomson LLP v. Hilton Worldwide Holding LLP, 2020 FCA 134
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FCA 134 |
| Date | 09 September 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
29 practice notes
-
Travel Leaders Group, LLC v. 2042923 Ontario Inc. (Travel Leaders), 2023 FC 319
...lighter in a section 45 case than in [a section 57] expungement proceeding” (Miller Thomson LLP v Hilton Worldwide Holdings LLP, 2020 FCA 134 at para 139 (Hilton Worldwide)). [67] Second, there is a further distinction that is critical to my assessment of the evidence. Paragraph 18(1......
-
Caterpillar Inc. v. Puma SE,
...to the conclusions of the underlying decision maker: Clorox, above at para 23; Miller Thomson LLP v Hilton Worldwide Holding LLP, 2020 FCA 134 at para 42. [36] In sum, I must assess the nature, significance, probative value, and reliability of the parties’ new evidence, in the contex......
-
Tokai of Canada Ltd v. Kingsford Products Company, LLC,
...to the conclusions of the underlying decision maker: Clorox, above at para 23; Miller Thomson LLP v Hilton Worldwide Holding LLP, 2020 FCA 134 at para 42. [23] In sum, I must assess the nature, significance, probative value, and reliability of the parties’ new evidence, in the contex......
-
Nia Wine Group Co., Ltd. v. North 42 Degrees Estate Winery Inc., 2022 FC 241
...to the conclusions of the underlying decision maker: Clorox, above at para 23; Miller Thomson LLP v Hilton Worldwide Holding LLP, 2020 FCA 134 at para 42. [36] In sum, I must assess the nature, significance, probative value, and reliability of the parties’ new evidence, in the contex......
Request a trial to view additional results
20 cases
-
Tweak-D Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FCA 238
...Federal Court’s decision: Puma SE v. Caterpillar Inc., 2023 FCA 4 at para. 18; Miller Thomson LLP v. Hilton Worldwide Holding LLP, 2020 FCA 134 at paras. 41-42. These standards are correctness for questions of law and palpable and overriding error for questions of fact and questions ......
-
Travel Leaders Group, LLC v. 2042923 Ontario Inc. (Travel Leaders), 2023 FC 319
...lighter in a section 45 case than in [a section 57] expungement proceeding” (Miller Thomson LLP v Hilton Worldwide Holdings LLP, 2020 FCA 134 at para 139 (Hilton Worldwide)). [67] Second, there is a further distinction that is critical to my assessment of the evidence. Paragraph 18(1......
-
Tokai of Canada Ltd v. Kingsford Products Company, LLC,
...to the conclusions of the underlying decision maker: Clorox, above at para 23; Miller Thomson LLP v Hilton Worldwide Holding LLP, 2020 FCA 134 at para 42. [23] In sum, I must assess the nature, significance, probative value, and reliability of the parties’ new evidence, in the contex......
-
Caterpillar Inc. v. Puma SE,
...to the conclusions of the underlying decision maker: Clorox, above at para 23; Miller Thomson LLP v Hilton Worldwide Holding LLP, 2020 FCA 134 at para 42. [36] In sum, I must assess the nature, significance, probative value, and reliability of the parties’ new evidence, in the contex......
Request a trial to view additional results
11 firm's commentaries
-
IP Litigation 2020 Year In Review
...Group Inc v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 586 at para. 27 (Justice Fuhrer). 81. Miller Thomson LLP v. Hilton Worldwide Holding LLP, 2020 FCA 134 (Mactavish, Webb, Near 82. Miller Thomson LLP v. Hilton Worldwide Holding LLP, 2020 FCA 134 at paras. 47-48 (citations omitted). 83. Miller ......
-
Year In Review ' Key Trademark Cases From 2020
...LLP v. Miller Thomson LLP, 2018 FC 895, and the Federal Court of Appeal's decision in Miller Thomson LLP v. Hilton Worldwide Holding LLP, 2020 FCA 134, the prevailing trend had been that trademarks covering "hotel services" could not be maintained in response to non-use cancellation proceed......
-
Federal Court Of Appeal Reviews Meaning Of "Use" Of A Trademark In Canada
...Thomson LLP v Hilton Worldwide Holding LLP, 2020 FCA 134, the Canadian Federal Court of recently confirmed that a trademark associated with "hotel services" was valid despite no brick-and-mortar presence in Canada. More specifically, the Court acknowledged that providing incidental or ancil......
-
Trademark Use: No Need For A "Bricks And Mortar" Presence In Canada
...border electronically and be a deterrent to adoption, use and registration of the same or a confusingly similar mark in Canada. ___ 1. 2020 FCA 134. 2. Ibid at para 3. Ibid at para 3. 4. Ibid at para 11. 5. Ibid at para 17. 6. Ibid at para 18. 7. Ibid at para 20. 8. Ibid at para 19. 9. Ibid......
Request a trial to view additional results