Monument Mining Ltd. v. Balendran Chong & Bodi et al., [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1769
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Judge | Goepel, J. |
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Subject Matter | LIBEL AND SLANDER,TORTS,PRACTICE |
Citation | [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1769,[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1769 (SC),2012 BCSC 1769 |
Date | 29 November 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 practice notes
-
Summary of Defamation Law
...Ottawa Capital Area Crime Stoppers, 2018 ONSC 4207 Duncan v Lessing, 2016 BCSC 1386 Monument Mining Limited v Balendran Chong & Bodi, 2012 BCSC 1769 Report Privilege The Australian decision Sands v Channel Seven Adelaide Pty Ltd & Anor, [2009] SASC 215 held at para 350 that: 350 The sta......
-
Table of Cases
...Beacon Publishing Inc et al, 2017 ONSC 6361 ............................ 236, 328, 411 Monument Mining Limited v Balendran Chong & Bodi, 2012 BCSC 1769 ..........................10 Mudford v Smith, 2009 CanLII 55718 (ON SC) .............................................................8, 9, ......
-
Hudson v. Myong, 2020 BCSC 517
...thereby tend to lower Try in the estimation of right thinking members of society: Monument Mining Limited v. Balendran Chong & Bodi, 2012 BCSC 1769 at para. 78. I have considered the close relationship between Mr. Hudson and Try in my assessment of damages. Conclusion: General Damages [......
-
Skyllar v. The University of British Columbia,
...is not considered publication for the purpose of defamation. Here I refer to Monument Mining Limited v. Balendran Chong & Bodi, 2012 BCSC 1769, paras. 92 to [15] Second, such correspondence is also protected by absolute privilege: Peak Innova......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
Skyllar v. The University of British Columbia, 2022 BCSC 439
...is not considered publication for the purpose of defamation. Here I refer to Monument Mining Limited v. Balendran Chong & Bodi, 2012 BCSC 1769, paras. 92 to [15] Second, such correspondence is also protected by absolute privilege: Peak Innova......
-
Hudson v. Myong, 2020 BCSC 517
...thereby tend to lower Try in the estimation of right thinking members of society: Monument Mining Limited v. Balendran Chong & Bodi, 2012 BCSC 1769 at para. 78. I have considered the close relationship between Mr. Hudson and Try in my assessment of damages. Conclusion: General Damages [......
-
Gross v. Peak Products Manufacturing Inc., 2022 BCSC 861
...civil claim for breach of contract. As Justice Goepel (as he then was) stated in Monument Mining Limited v. Balendran Chong & Bodi, 2012 BCSC 1769: [104] Relying in part on the decision in Hamouth, Groves J. [in Peak Innovations] dismissed the action. He noted that abs......
-
Lee-Sheriff v. Christman, 2022 BCSC 1914
...the company, in the ordinary course of business, does not constitute publication: Monument Mining Limited v. Balendran Chong & Bodi, 2012 BCSC 1769 at paras. 88-91. This would thus exclude Mr. Sheriff as being a “third party” for the purposes of publication. [83] ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Defences To The Tort Of Defamation
...- involved in the furtherance of judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings (e.g., Monument Mining Ltd. v. Balendran Chong & Bodi, 2012 BCSC 1769). In two very recent decisions, our courts have had the opportunity to test how far the defence will be extended to administrative tribunals and ......
2 books & journal articles
-
Summary of Defamation Law
...Ottawa Capital Area Crime Stoppers, 2018 ONSC 4207 Duncan v Lessing, 2016 BCSC 1386 Monument Mining Limited v Balendran Chong & Bodi, 2012 BCSC 1769 Report Privilege The Australian decision Sands v Channel Seven Adelaide Pty Ltd & Anor, [2009] SASC 215 held at para 350 that: 350 The sta......
-
Table of Cases
...Beacon Publishing Inc et al, 2017 ONSC 6361 ............................ 236, 328, 411 Monument Mining Limited v Balendran Chong & Bodi, 2012 BCSC 1769 ..........................10 Mudford v Smith, 2009 CanLII 55718 (ON SC) .............................................................8, 9, ......