Mudiyanselage v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 749
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
Citation | 2018 FC 749 |
Date | 18 July 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
Sundralingam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1768
...value and sufficiency of evidence without being required to hold an oral hearing: Mudiyanselage v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 749 at para 31; Mosavat v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 FC 647 at para 13; Parchment v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2008 F......
-
Jystina v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912
...of procedural fairness. Cases that espoused a correctness review pre-Vavilov include Mudiyanselage v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 749 at para 11; and Nadarajan v Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 FC 403 at paras 12-14. Others applied a reas......
-
Farah v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1162
...Weighing the evidence is a function of the PRRA and not a reviewable error” (Mudiyanselage v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 749 at para 31 [Mudiyanselage]). The Officer’s decision is reasonable. There was no duty to provide an oral hearing. In Ikeji v Canada (Citizenship and ......
-
Khan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1515
...to be divided since Zmari. Some decisions apply a correctness standard of review (Mudiyanselage v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 749 at para 11; Nadarajan v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 FC 403 at paras 12 to 17). Others apply a reasonableness standa......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
Sundralingam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1768
...value and sufficiency of evidence without being required to hold an oral hearing: Mudiyanselage v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 749 at para 31; Mosavat v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 FC 647 at para 13; Parchment v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2008 F......
-
Jystina v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912
...of procedural fairness. Cases that espoused a correctness review pre-Vavilov include Mudiyanselage v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 749 at para 11; and Nadarajan v Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 FC 403 at paras 12-14. Others applied a reas......
-
Farah v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1162
...Weighing the evidence is a function of the PRRA and not a reviewable error” (Mudiyanselage v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 749 at para 31 [Mudiyanselage]). The Officer’s decision is reasonable. There was no duty to provide an oral hearing. In Ikeji v Canada (Citizenship and ......
-
Khan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1515
...to be divided since Zmari. Some decisions apply a correctness standard of review (Mudiyanselage v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 749 at para 11; Nadarajan v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 FC 403 at paras 12 to 17). Others apply a reasonableness standa......
Request a trial to view additional results