Mudiyanselage v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 749

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2018 FC 749
Date18 July 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • Sundralingam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1768
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 20, 2022
    ...value and sufficiency of evidence without being required to hold an oral hearing: Mudiyanselage v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 749 at para 31; Mosavat v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 FC 647 at para 13; Parchment v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2008 F......
  • Jystina v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 18, 2020
    ...of procedural fairness. Cases that espoused a correctness review pre-Vavilov include Mudiyanselage v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 749 at para 11; and Nadarajan v Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 FC 403 at paras 12-14. Others applied a reas......
  • Farah v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1162
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 16, 2018
    ...Weighing the evidence is a function of the PRRA and not a reviewable error” (Mudiyanselage v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 749 at para 31 [Mudiyanselage]). The Officer’s decision is reasonable. There was no duty to provide an oral hearing. In Ikeji v Canada (Citizenship and ......
  • Khan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1515
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 27, 2019
    ...to be divided since Zmari. Some decisions apply a correctness standard of review (Mudiyanselage v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 749 at para 11; Nadarajan v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 FC 403 at paras 12 to 17). Others apply a reasonableness standa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • Sundralingam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1768
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 20, 2022
    ...value and sufficiency of evidence without being required to hold an oral hearing: Mudiyanselage v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 749 at para 31; Mosavat v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 FC 647 at para 13; Parchment v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2008 F......
  • Jystina v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 18, 2020
    ...of procedural fairness. Cases that espoused a correctness review pre-Vavilov include Mudiyanselage v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 749 at para 11; and Nadarajan v Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 FC 403 at paras 12-14. Others applied a reas......
  • Farah v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1162
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 16, 2018
    ...Weighing the evidence is a function of the PRRA and not a reviewable error” (Mudiyanselage v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 749 at para 31 [Mudiyanselage]). The Officer’s decision is reasonable. There was no duty to provide an oral hearing. In Ikeji v Canada (Citizenship and ......
  • Khan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1515
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 27, 2019
    ...to be divided since Zmari. Some decisions apply a correctness standard of review (Mudiyanselage v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 749 at para 11; Nadarajan v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 FC 403 at paras 12 to 17). Others apply a reasonableness standa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT