Ojo v Crystal Claire Cosmetics Inc., 2021 ONSC 1428
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Judge | DIAMOND J. |
Neutral Citation | 2021 ONSC 1428 |
Docket Number | CV-19-00625331 |
Citation | 2021 ONSC 1428 |
Date | 26 February 2021 |
Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 18 - 22, 2022)
...& Associates Limited, 2021 ONSC 8049, Cummings v. Quantum Automotive Group Inc., 2017 ONSC 1785, Ojo v. Crystal Claire Cosmetics Inc., 2021 ONSC 1428, Khashaba v. Procom Consultants Group Ltd., 2018 ONSC 7617, McCabe v. Roman Catholic Episcopal Corp., 2019 ONCA 213, Tadayon v. Mohtashami, 2......
-
Render v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator (Canada) Limited,
...C.A. requested, M53078; Cummings v. Quantum Automotive Group Inc., 2017 ONSC 1785, at para. 73; Ojo v. Crystal Claire Cosmetics Inc., 2021 ONSC 1428, 60 C.C.P.B. (2nd) 200, at para. 14; and Khashaba v. Procom Consultants Group Ltd., 2018 ONSC 7617, 52 C.C.E.L. (4th) 89, at para. [81] &......
-
Rahman v. Cannon Design Architecture Inc.,
...cause for summary dismissal” contained in this employment agreement was also considered in Ojo v Crystal Claire Cosmetics Inc., 2021 ONSC 1428 (CanLII) and declared to be an invalid attempt to contract out of the ESA in that case. [25] ......
-
Termination Provisions Negotiated By Employee And Employer Of Equal Bargaining Power ' Waksdale Distinguished
...("Rahman"), 2021 ONSC 5961. 2. Waksdale v Swegon North America Inc., 2020 ONCA 391 ("Waksdale"). 3. Ojo v Crystal Claire Cosmetics Inc., 2021 ONSC 1428 4. Rahman at para 16; Ojo at para 8. 5. Ojo at paras 14-18. 6. Waksdale at para 10. 7. Rahman at paras 27-30. 8. Rahman at para 28. 9. Rahm......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 cases
-
Render v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator (Canada) Limited,
...C.A. requested, M53078; Cummings v. Quantum Automotive Group Inc., 2017 ONSC 1785, at para. 73; Ojo v. Crystal Claire Cosmetics Inc., 2021 ONSC 1428, 60 C.C.P.B. (2nd) 200, at para. 14; and Khashaba v. Procom Consultants Group Ltd., 2018 ONSC 7617, 52 C.C.E.L. (4th) 89, at para. [81] &......
-
Rahman v. Cannon Design Architecture Inc.,
...cause for summary dismissal” contained in this employment agreement was also considered in Ojo v Crystal Claire Cosmetics Inc., 2021 ONSC 1428 (CanLII) and declared to be an invalid attempt to contract out of the ESA in that case. [25] ......
4 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 18 - 22, 2022)
...& Associates Limited, 2021 ONSC 8049, Cummings v. Quantum Automotive Group Inc., 2017 ONSC 1785, Ojo v. Crystal Claire Cosmetics Inc., 2021 ONSC 1428, Khashaba v. Procom Consultants Group Ltd., 2018 ONSC 7617, McCabe v. Roman Catholic Episcopal Corp., 2019 ONCA 213, Tadayon v. Mohtashami, 2......
-
Termination Provisions Negotiated By Employee And Employer Of Equal Bargaining Power ' Waksdale Distinguished
...("Rahman"), 2021 ONSC 5961. 2. Waksdale v Swegon North America Inc., 2020 ONCA 391 ("Waksdale"). 3. Ojo v Crystal Claire Cosmetics Inc., 2021 ONSC 1428 4. Rahman at para 16; Ojo at para 8. 5. Ojo at paras 14-18. 6. Waksdale at para 10. 7. Rahman at paras 27-30. 8. Rahman at para 28. 9. Rahm......
-
Termination Provisions Negotiated By Employee And Employer Of Equal Bargaining Power ' Waksdale Distinguished
...("Rahman"), 2021 ONSC 5961. 2. Waksdale v Swegon North America Inc., 2020 ONCA 391 ("Waksdale"). 3. Ojo v Crystal Claire Cosmetics Inc., 2021 ONSC 1428 4. Rahman at para 16; Ojo at para 8. 5. Ojo at paras 14-18. 6. Waksdale at para 10. 7. Rahman at paras 27-30. 8. Rahman at para 28. 9. Rahm......
-
Increased Judicial Scrutiny In ON With Respect To Termination Clauses
...they do not comply with the statutory requirements under the Employment Standards Act (Ontario). In Ojo v. Crystal Claire Cosmetics Inc., 2021 ONSC 1428, relying on the decision in Waksdale, the Ontario Superior Court found the termination clause in an employment agreement was unenforceable......