Olumide v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., 2016 FC 934
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Case Date | August 15, 2016 |
| Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
| Citations | 2016 FC 934 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Table of cases
...Council) (1998), 155 FTR 117 (TD) ............................................................ 198 Olumide v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 934 ................................ 220, 226 Ontario (Attorney General) v Dieleman, 1994 CanLII 10546 (Ont Gen Div) ....98 Ontario (Attorney Gener......
-
Access to Information in the Public Sector
...and technical expertise normally used by the institution ” [emphasis added]. 521 See, for example, Olumide v Canada (Attorney General) , 2016 FC 934 at para 18 [ Olumide ]. 522 Office of the Information Commissioner of Canada, “Access to Information at Risk from Instant Messaging” (2013), o......
-
Lambert v. Canada (Canadian Heritage), 2022 FC 553
...has jurisdiction under section 41 of the ATIA only when there has been a refusal to release records: Olumide v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 934 at paras 18–19; Friesen v Canada (Health), 2017 FC 1152 at para 10; Tomar v Canada (Parks), 2018 FC 224 at para 45; Constantinescu v Canada (......
-
Kimery v. Canada (Justice), 2022 FC 829
...suggesting) that a response of that nature did not represent refusal of access to a record (see, e.g. Olumide v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 934 at para 18). However, in Lambert, Justice McHaffie considered the relevant authorities and concluded that a response, that a record does not......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
Lambert v. Canada (Canadian Heritage), 2022 FC 553
...has jurisdiction under section 41 of the ATIA only when there has been a refusal to release records: Olumide v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 934 at paras 18–19; Friesen v Canada (Health), 2017 FC 1152 at para 10; Tomar v Canada (Parks), 2018 FC 224 at para 45; Constantinescu v Canada (......
-
Kimery v. Canada (Justice), 2022 FC 829
...suggesting) that a response of that nature did not represent refusal of access to a record (see, e.g. Olumide v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 934 at para 18). However, in Lambert, Justice McHaffie considered the relevant authorities and concluded that a response, that a record does not......
-
Tomar v. Canada (Parks Agnecy), 2018 FC 224
...sufficient to establish the premise that further records do exist. Some evidence beyond mere suspicion is required: Olumide v Canada (AG), 2016 FC 934 at para 18, [2016] 6 CTC 1. [46] None of Ms. Tomar’s beliefs or suspicions that further records should exist are supported by any evidence. ......
-
Friesen v. Canada (Health), 2017 FC 1152
...an unlawful refusal to disclose an identified record. One of the clearest statements to this effect can be found in Olumide v Canada (AG), 2016 FC 934, [2016] 6 CTC 1, where Prothonotary Mireille Tabib [18] To the extent the application is an application pursuant to s 41 of the ATIA for jud......
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...Council) (1998), 155 FTR 117 (TD) ............................................................ 198 Olumide v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 934 ................................ 220, 226 Ontario (Attorney General) v Dieleman, 1994 CanLII 10546 (Ont Gen Div) ....98 Ontario (Attorney Gener......
-
Access to Information in the Public Sector
...and technical expertise normally used by the institution ” [emphasis added]. 521 See, for example, Olumide v Canada (Attorney General) , 2016 FC 934 at para 18 [ Olumide ]. 522 Office of the Information Commissioner of Canada, “Access to Information at Risk from Instant Messaging” (2013), o......