Osahor v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 666
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,CROWN,STATUTES,PRACTICE |
| Citation | 2017 FC 666 |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 10 July 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Kim v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 526
...(NK v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2015 FC 1377 at paras 62, 80, 102; Osahor v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 666 at para 22). Moreover, the applicant’s questions rest on a false premise. The applicant characterizes a PGWP as a “one-time opportunity.” Wh......
-
Idowu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 46
...v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1019 at para 12; Osahor v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 666 at paras 12-17; Kaur v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 572 at para 13; Kim v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immi......
-
Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 687
...law (Komljenovic v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 460 at para 17, citing Osahor v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 666 at para 11), and is consistent with the guidance in the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v......
-
Saloni v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...to the competitiveness of Canada’s economy or academic institutions”: Osahor v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 666 (Gleeson J.), at para 14; Kaur v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 513 (McHaffie J.), at para 8. [20] For applicants, the PGWP program &......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
Kim v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 526
...(NK v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2015 FC 1377 at paras 62, 80, 102; Osahor v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 666 at para 22). Moreover, the applicant’s questions rest on a false premise. The applicant characterizes a PGWP as a “one-time opportunity.” Wh......
-
Idowu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 46
...v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1019 at para 12; Osahor v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 666 at paras 12-17; Kaur v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 572 at para 13; Kim v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immi......
-
Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 687
...law (Komljenovic v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 460 at para 17, citing Osahor v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 666 at para 11), and is consistent with the guidance in the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v......
-
Saloni v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...to the competitiveness of Canada’s economy or academic institutions”: Osahor v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 666 (Gleeson J.), at para 14; Kaur v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 513 (McHaffie J.), at para 8. [20] For applicants, the PGWP program &......
Request a trial to view additional results