Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Canada; Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Ontario, [1992] 3 SCR 762
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Judge | Lamer, Antonio; La Forest, Gérard V.; Sopinka, John; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank |
Date | 19 November 1992 |
Citation | [1992] 3 SCR 762,144 NR 1,1992 CanLII 21 (SCC),98 DLR (4th) 140,36 ACWS (3d) 881,[1992] SCJ No 101 (QL),JE 92-1756,12 MPLR (2d) 229,55 FTR 277,59 OAC 81 |
Docket Number | 21342, 22301 |
Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
366 practice notes
-
Elder Advocates of Alberta Society et al. v. Alberta et al., (2011) 416 N.R. 198 (SCC)
...93]. Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Canada - see Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Ontario. Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Ontario, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 762; 144 N.R. 1; 59 O.A.C. 81, refd to. [para. Authors and Works Noticed: Ellis, Mark Vincent, Fiduciary Duties in Canada (1993) (2011 Looselea......
-
Al-Ghamdi v Alberta, 2017 ABQB 684
...in the circumstances of the case. (Kerr v. Baranow, 2011 SCC 10 at paras 38, 39 and 40). [169] In Peel (Regional Municipality) v Canada, [1992] 3 SCR 762, McLachlin J (as she then was) noted (at para 41): Thus for recovery to lie, something must have been given, whether goods, services or m......
-
Rice, P.C.J. v. New Brunswick, (1999) 235 N.B.R.(2d) 1 (CA)
...v. Saskatchewan, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 42; 23 N.R. 481; 88 D.L.R.(3d) 609, refd to. [para. 176]. Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Ontario, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 762; 144 N.R. 1; 59 O.A.C. 81; 12 M.P.L.R.(2d) 229, refd to. [para. Crown Trust Co. and Greymac Trust Co. v. Ontario, Taylor, Touche, Ross Ltd.......
-
Elder Advocates of Alberta Society et al. v. Alberta et al., (2008) 453 A.R. 1 (QB)
...Gas Co., [2004] 1 S.C.R. 629; 319 N.R. 38; 186 O.A.C. 128; 2004 SCC 25, refd to. [para. 424]. Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Ontario, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 762; 144 N.R. 1; 59 O.A.C. 81, refd to. [para. Garland v. Consumers' Gas Co., [2000] O.T.C. 266; 185 D.L.R.(4th) 536 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [p......
Get Started for Free
316 cases
-
Elder Advocates of Alberta Society et al. v. Alberta et al.,
...93]. Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Canada - see Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Ontario. Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Ontario, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 762; 144 N.R. 1; 59 O.A.C. 81, refd to. [para. Authors and Works Noticed: Ellis, Mark Vincent, Fiduciary Duties in Canada (1993) (2011 Looselea......
-
Al-Ghamdi v Alberta, 2017 ABQB 684
...in the circumstances of the case. (Kerr v. Baranow, 2011 SCC 10 at paras 38, 39 and 40). [169] In Peel (Regional Municipality) v Canada, [1992] 3 SCR 762, McLachlin J (as she then was) noted (at para 41): Thus for recovery to lie, something must have been given, whether goods, services or m......
-
Rice, P.C.J. v. New Brunswick, (1999) 235 N.B.R.(2d) 1 (CA)
...v. Saskatchewan, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 42; 23 N.R. 481; 88 D.L.R.(3d) 609, refd to. [para. 176]. Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Ontario, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 762; 144 N.R. 1; 59 O.A.C. 81; 12 M.P.L.R.(2d) 229, refd to. [para. Crown Trust Co. and Greymac Trust Co. v. Ontario, Taylor, Touche, Ross Ltd.......
-
Elder Advocates of Alberta Society et al. v. Alberta et al., (2008) 453 A.R. 1 (QB)
...Gas Co., [2004] 1 S.C.R. 629; 319 N.R. 38; 186 O.A.C. 128; 2004 SCC 25, refd to. [para. 424]. Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Ontario, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 762; 144 N.R. 1; 59 O.A.C. 81, refd to. [para. Garland v. Consumers' Gas Co., [2000] O.T.C. 266; 185 D.L.R.(4th) 536 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [p......
Get Started for Free
5 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 20 ' 24, 2022)
...2016 FCA 28, Garland v Consumers' Gas Co., 2004 SCC 25, Peel (Regional Municipality) v Canada; Peel (Regional Municipality) v Ontario, [1992] 3 SCR 762, Grover v Hodgins, 2011 ONCA 72, Birkett v Astris Energi Inc. (2004), 45 BLR (3d) 293 (Ont. CA), Accuworx Inc. v Enroute Imports Inc., 2016......
-
Hail To The Chief: McLachlin C.J.C. Becomes Canadas Longest-Serving Chief Justice
...damages and the existence of an implied duty of good faith in employment termination; and Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Canada, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 762, which reconciled the "principled" and "categorical" approaches to restitution, and defined the nature of "benefit" in the test for unjust en......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 21 ' August 25, 2023)
...grounds 2009 SCC 15, Re Oatway, [1903] 2 Ch. 356, Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Canada; Peel (Regional Municipality v. Ontario, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 762 Rose-Isli Corp v Smith, 2023 ONCA 548 Keywords: Bankruptcy and Insolvency, Receiverships, Sales Process, Mortgages, Right of Redemption, Mort......
-
Professional Ethics In A Tax World – Self-Assessment, Self-Incrimination, The Charter, Crown Fairness And Other Matters
...to return a benefit where the defendant is able 102 Garland, supra note 41 at para 30. 103 Peel (Regional Municipality) v Canada, [1992] 3 SCR 762. 104 Peter v Beblow, [1993] 1 SCR 980. 105 Ibid. 106 Ibid. 107 Garland, supra note 41 at paras 44‐45. 32 to demonstrate a material change in pos......
Get Started for Free
44 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...[1997] OJ No 1874 (Gen Div), aff’d (1998), 117 OAC 379, [1998] OJ No 5265 (CA) ..........138, 142 Peel (Regional Municipality) v Canada, [1992] 3 SCR 762, 98 DLR (4th) 140, [1992] SCJ No 101 ................................................ 281, 285 Peeters v Canada (1992), 54 FTR (289) (TD)......
-
Introduction
...See also Air Canada v. British Columbia (1989), 59 D.L.R. (4th) 161 at 193 [Air Canada]. 172 Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Canada, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 762 at para. 41 [Peel]. VOLUME 6, N o 1, april 2010 71 held that unjust enrichment would generally be unavailable in this situation because: I......
-
An Old Snail in a New Bottle? Waiver of Tort as An Independent Cause of Action
...See also Air Canada v. British Columbia (1989), 59 D.L.R. (4th) 161 at 193 [Air Canada]. 172 Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Canada, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 762 at para. 41 [Peel]. VOLUME 6, N o 1, april 2010 71 held that unjust enrichment would generally be unavailable in this situation because: I......
-
Waiving Goodbye: The Rise and Imminent Fall of Waiver of Tort in Class Proceedings
...See also Air Canada v. British Columbia (1989), 59 D.L.R. (4th) 161 at 193 [Air Canada]. 172 Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Canada, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 762 at para. 41 [Peel]. VOLUME 6, N o 1, april 2010 71 held that unjust enrichment would generally be unavailable in this situation because: I......
Get Started for Free