P.G. Restaurant Ltd. v. Northern Interior Regional Health Board et al., [2004] B.C.T.C. 294 (SC)

JudgeGoepel, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateMarch 04, 2004
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations[2004] B.C.T.C. 294 (SC);2004 BCSC 294

PG Restaurant Ltd. v. Health Bd., [2004] B.C.T.C. 294 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2004] B.C.T.C. TBEd. MR.062

P.G. Restaurant Ltd. doing business as Mama Panda Restaurant (plaintiff) v. Northern Interior Regional Health Board, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia, Bruce Gaunt, Michelle Lang, Lorne Doerkson, Cameron McAlpine, Cariboo Press (1969) Ltd., Cariboo Press (1969) Ltd. doing business as The Prince George Free Press, The Prince George Free Press and John Doe Corporation doing business as The Prince George Free Press (defendants)

(S013887; 2004 BCSC 294)

Indexed As: P.G. Restaurant Ltd. v. Northern Interior Regional Health Board et al.

British Columbia Supreme Court

Vancouver

Goepel, J.

March 4, 2004.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Damage Awards - Topic 632

Torts/Quebec responsibility - Injury to the person - Libel and slander - See paragraphs 208 to 258.

Libel and Slander - Topic 603

The statement - General - Defamatory defined - See paragraphs 111 to 141.

Libel and Slander - Topic 2864

Defences - Justification or truth - Evidence and proof - See paragraphs 142 to 155.

Libel and Slander - Topic 2988.1

Defences - Qualified privilege - Loss of - Where limits of privilege exceeded - See paragraphs 162 to 181.

Libel and Slander - Topic 2995

Defences - Qualified privilege - Public duty - General - See paragraphs 162 to 181.

Libel and Slander - Topic 3114

Defences - Fair comment - What constitutes fair comment - See paragraphs 156 to 161.

Libel and Slander - Topic 4405

Damages - General - Special damages - See paragraphs 208 to 258.

Libel and Slander - Topic 4423

Damages - General damages - Measure of - Elements and considerations - See paragraphs 208 to 258.

Torts - Topic 9157.2

Duty of care - Particular relationships - Claims against public officials, authorities or boards - Public health authorities - See paragraphs 182 to 207.

Cases Noticed:

Hodgson v. Canadian Newspapers Co. et al. (1998), 68 O.T.C. 81; 39 O.R.(3d) 235 (Gen. Div.), varied (2000), 133 O.A.C. 174; 49 O.R.(3d) 161 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 111].

Kerr v. Conlogue (1992), 65 B.C.L.R.(2d) 70 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 113].

Dale's Trad'n Post Ltd. et al. v. Rhodes and Southam Inc. (1987), 19 B.C.L.R.(2d) 73 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 125].

Knupffer v. London Express Newspaper Ltd., [1944] 1 All E.R. 495 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 126].

Charleston v. News Group Newspapers Ltd. et al., [1995] 2 All E.R. 313; 184 N.R. 321 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 137].

Bennett v. Sun Publishing Co. (1972), 29 D.L.R.(3d) 423 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 140].

Taylor-Wright et al. v. CHBC-TV et al. (1999), 4 B.C.T.C. 1 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 143].

Vander Zalm v. Times Publishers Ltd. (1980), 109 D.L.R.(3d) 531 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 157].

Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto and Manning, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 1130; 184 N.R. 1; 84 O.A.C. 1; 126 D.L.R.(4th) 129, refd to. [para. 162].

Camporese v. Parton (1983), 150 D.L.R.(3d) 208 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 165].

Jones v. Bennett, [1969] S.C.R. 277, refd to. [para. 170].

Moises v. Canadian Newspaper Co. (1996), 76 B.C.A.C. 263; 125 W.A.C. 263; 24 B.C.L.R.(3d) 211 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 171].

Reynolds v. Times Newspapers Ltd., [1999] 4 All E.R. 609; 250 N.R. 1 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 175].

Dhami et al. v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp. et al., [2001] B.C.T.C. 1811 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 176].

Littleton v. Hamilton et al. (1974), 47 D.L.R.(3d) 663 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 177].

Leenen v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp. et al. (2000), 105 O.T.C. 91; 48 O.R.(3d) 656 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 178].

Pressler v. Lethbridge et al. (2000), 144 B.C.A.C. 1; 236 W.A.C. 1; 86 B.C.L.R.(3d) 257 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 180].

Horrocks v. Lowe, [1974] 1 All E.R. 662 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 180].

Spring v. Guardian Assurance plc et al., [1995] 2 A.C. 296; 174 N.R. 164 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 182].

Anns v. Merton London Borough Council, [1978] A.C. 728 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 184].

Cooper v. Registrar of Mortgage Brokers (B.C.) et al., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 537; 277 N.R. 113; 160 B.C.A.C. 268; 261 W.A.C. 268, refd to. [para. 184].

Cooper v. Hobart - see Cooper v. Registrar of Mortgage Brokers (B.C.) et al.

Foaminol Laboratories Ltd. v. British Artid Plastics Ltd., [1941] 2 All E.R. 393 (K.B.), refd to. [para. 189].

Bell-Booth Group Ltd. v. Attorney General, [1989] 3 N.Z.L.R. 148 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 190].

Balfour v. Attorney General, [1991] 1 N.Z.L.R. 519 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 191].

Fulton v. Globe and Mail et al. (1996), 194 A.R. 254; 3 C.P.C.(4th) 240 (Q.B. Master), affd. (1997), 207 A.R. 374; 152 D.L.R.(4th) 377 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 197].

Haskett v. Trans Union of Canada Inc. (2003), 169 O.A.C. 201; 63 O.R.(3d) 577 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 200].

Haskett v. Equifax Canada Inc. - see Haskett v. Trans Union of Canada Inc.

Sattin v. Nationwide News Pty. Ltd. (1996), 39 N.S.W.L.R. 32, refd to. [para. 202].

Wade v. Victoria (State), [1999] 1 V.R. 121, refd to. [para. 203].

Botiuk v. Bardyn et al., [1995] 3 S.C.R. 3; 186 N.R. 1; 85 O.A.C. 81; 126 D.L.R.(4th) 609; 26 C.C.L.T.(2d) 109, refd to. [para. 209].

Botiuk v. Toronto Free Press Publications Ltd. - see Botiuk v. Bardyn et al.

Lapointe v. Summach, [2001] B.C.T.C. 805 (S.C.), dist. [para. 210].

Burstein v. Times Newspapers Ltd., [2001] 1 W.L.R. 579 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 214].

Brown v. Cole et al., [1996] B.C.J. No. 2046 (S.C.), varied [1999] 7 W.W.R. 703; 114 B.C.A.C. 73; 186 W.A.C. 73 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 215].

Electronic Superstore Ltd. v. Geransky Brothers Construction Ltd. et al. (1990), 87 Sask.R. 194 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 249].

Authors and Works Noticed:

Brown, Raymond E., The Law of Defamation in Canada (2nd Ed.) (1999 Looseleaf Supp.), vol. 1, pp. 4-3 [para. 112]; 5-108, 5-109 [para. 130]; vol. 2, pp. 10-2 to 10-4 [para. 142]; 15-14 [para. 156].

Gatley on Libel and Slander (8th Ed. 1981), p. 94-100 [para. 209]; para. 281 [para. 124].

Waddams, Stephen M., The Law of Damages (2003 Looseleaf Ed.), para. 15.290 [para. 247].

Counsel:

H.A. Mickelson and S.R. Miller, for the plaintiff;

D.T. McKnight and K.R. Zimmer, for the defendant, Northern Interior Regional Health Board;

D.W. Burnett and J.L. Williams, for the defendants, Michelle Lang, Lorne Doerkson, Cameron McAlpine, Cariboo Press (1969) Ltd. doing business as The Prince George Free Press and The Prince George Free Press.

This case was heard on August 11-15, 18-22 and 25-27 and September 15-19, 2003, before Goepel, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on March 4, 2004.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 practice notes
  • Damages
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Libel and Slander Actions
    • June 17, 2004
    ...S.C.C.A. No. 465. PG. Restaurant Ltd. (c.o.b. Mama Panda Restaurant) v. Northern Interior Regional Health Board, [2004] B.C.J. No. 424, 2004 BCSC 294 (award consisted solely of special damages, general damages were not claimed). C. PUNITIVE DAMAGES Punitive damages are not at large. Whiten ......
  • Dinyer-Fraser v. Laurentian Bk., 2005 BCSC 225
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 6, 2004
    ...consd. [para. 215]. P.G. Restaurant Ltd. v. Northern Interior Regional Health Board et al., [2004] B.C.T.C. 294; [2004] 4 W.W.R. 287; 2004 BCSC 294, consd. [para. 216]. Trizec Properties Inc. et al. v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc. et al., [2004] O.T.C. 616 (Sup. Ct.), consd. [para. 218]. A......
  • Qualified Privilege and Publication to the World at Large
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Libel and Slander Actions
    • June 17, 2004
    ...119 (B.C.S.C.). P.G. Restaurant Ltd. (c.o.b. Mama Panda Restaurant) v. Northern Interior Regional Health Board, [2004] B.CJ. No. 424, 2004 BCSC 294. Hodgson v. Canadian Newspapers Co. (1998), 39 O.R. (3d) 235 (Gen. Div), varied as to damages (2000), 189 D.L.R. (4th) 241 (Ont. C.A.), leave t......
  • Cimolai v. Hall,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 7, 2005
    ...refd to. [para. 172]. P.G. Restaurant Ltd. v. Northern Interior Regional Health Board et al., [2004] B.C.T.C. 294; 25 B.C.L.R.(4th) 242; 2004 BCSC 294, refd to. [para. 172]. Hodgson v. Canadian Newspapers Co. et al. (1998), 68 O.T.C. 81; 39 O.R.(3d) 235 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 173]. Tr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
  • Dinyer-Fraser v. Laurentian Bk., 2005 BCSC 225
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 6, 2004
    ...consd. [para. 215]. P.G. Restaurant Ltd. v. Northern Interior Regional Health Board et al., [2004] B.C.T.C. 294; [2004] 4 W.W.R. 287; 2004 BCSC 294, consd. [para. 216]. Trizec Properties Inc. et al. v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc. et al., [2004] O.T.C. 616 (Sup. Ct.), consd. [para. 218]. A......
  • Cimolai v. Hall,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 7, 2005
    ...refd to. [para. 172]. P.G. Restaurant Ltd. v. Northern Interior Regional Health Board et al., [2004] B.C.T.C. 294; 25 B.C.L.R.(4th) 242; 2004 BCSC 294, refd to. [para. 172]. Hodgson v. Canadian Newspapers Co. et al. (1998), 68 O.T.C. 81; 39 O.R.(3d) 235 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 173]. Tr......
  • Health Genetic Center Corp. o/a Health Genetics Center v. New Scientist Magazine, 2018 ONSC 7224
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 7, 2018
    ...644, 10 B.C.L.R. (3d) 201 at ¶57 (C.A.); P.G. Restaurant Ltd. v. Northern Interior Regional Health Board (2004), 25 B.C.L.R. (4th) 242, 2004 BCSC 294 [44] Ibid (Cimolai v. Hall) at para. 173 referring to Hodgson v. Canadian Newspapers Co. Ltd. (1998), 1998 CanLII 14820 (ON SC), 39 O.R. (3d)......
  • Popat v. MacLennan et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1601 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 21, 2014
    ...(3d) 201 at [paragraph] 57 (C.A.); P.G. Restaurant Ltd. v. Northern Interior Regional Health Board (2004), 25 B.C.L.R. (4th) 242, 2004 BCSC 294. 173 Where the gist or sting of the charge is proven to be true, minor inaccuracies do not defeat the defence of justification : Hodgson v. Canadia......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Defamation Suit Surrounding BC's Foreign Buyer Tax Is Dismissed
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 26, 2021
    ...in the comments, relying upon the test set out in the BC case of P.G. Restaurant Ltd. v. Northern Interior Regional Health Board, 2004 BCSC 294, the defendants were able to succeed on the various defences With respect to the radio station, Judge Milman found that the initial interview could......
3 books & journal articles
  • Damages
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Libel and Slander Actions
    • June 17, 2004
    ...S.C.C.A. No. 465. PG. Restaurant Ltd. (c.o.b. Mama Panda Restaurant) v. Northern Interior Regional Health Board, [2004] B.C.J. No. 424, 2004 BCSC 294 (award consisted solely of special damages, general damages were not claimed). C. PUNITIVE DAMAGES Punitive damages are not at large. Whiten ......
  • Qualified Privilege and Publication to the World at Large
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Libel and Slander Actions
    • June 17, 2004
    ...119 (B.C.S.C.). P.G. Restaurant Ltd. (c.o.b. Mama Panda Restaurant) v. Northern Interior Regional Health Board, [2004] B.CJ. No. 424, 2004 BCSC 294. Hodgson v. Canadian Newspapers Co. (1998), 39 O.R. (3d) 235 (Gen. Div), varied as to damages (2000), 189 D.L.R. (4th) 241 (Ont. C.A.), leave t......
  • Related Causes of Action
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Libel and Slander Actions
    • June 17, 2004
    ...A.R. 365 (Q.B.). P.G. Restaurant Ltd. (c.o.b. Mama Panda Restaurant) v. Northern Interior Regional Health Board, [2004] B.C.J. No. 424, 2004 BCSC 294, per Goepel J. at paras. 182206 [no duty of care on municipal officers concerning statement about restaurant]. But see Haskett v. Equifax Can......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT