Prolink Broker Network Inc. v. Jaitley et al., [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 4497

JudgeGoldstein, J.
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Case DateJuly 02, 2013
JurisdictionOntario
Citations[2013] O.T.C. Uned. 4497;2013 ONSC 4497;[2013] O.T.C. Uned. 4497 (SC)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 31 ' August 4)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 8 Agosto 2023
    ...33, Waxman v. Waxman, 44 B.L.R. (3d) 165, 186 O.A.C. 201 (C.A.), Pecore v. Pecore, 2007 SCC 17, Prolink Broker Network Inc. v. Jaitley, 2013 ONSC 4497, Ruparell v. J. H. Cochrane Investments Inc. et al., 2020 ONSC 7466, Alberta v. Elder Advocates of Alberta Society, 2011 SCC 24, Combe v. Co......
  • Seelster Farms et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen and OLG, 2020 ONSC 4013
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 29 Junio 2020
    ...of the agreement between the parties to be enforceable. Ontario makes also makes reference to Prolink Broker Network Inc. v. Jaitley, 2013 ONSC 4497, where R.F. Goldstein J. held that there must be an intention to create a legally binding relationship, and an agreement on all of the essenti......
  • 2023 ONCA 525,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...as the parties' intentions can be ascertained as to any further terms of the agreement. In [ Prolink Broker Network Inc. v. Jaitley, 2013 ONSC 4497], the only document signed was a letter of intent. The Defendant argued that the letter of intent was not binding because the parties neve......
  • Aiello v Bleta,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 3 Agosto 2023
    ...as the parties' intentions can be ascertained as to any further terms of the agreement. In [ Prolink Broker Network Inc. v. Jaitley, 2013 ONSC 4497], the only document signed was a letter of intent. The Defendant argued that the letter of intent was not binding because the parties neve......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • Seelster Farms et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen and OLG, 2020 ONSC 4013
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 29 Junio 2020
    ...of the agreement between the parties to be enforceable. Ontario makes also makes reference to Prolink Broker Network Inc. v. Jaitley, 2013 ONSC 4497, where R.F. Goldstein J. held that there must be an intention to create a legally binding relationship, and an agreement on all of the essenti......
  • 2023 ONCA 525,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...as the parties' intentions can be ascertained as to any further terms of the agreement. In [ Prolink Broker Network Inc. v. Jaitley, 2013 ONSC 4497], the only document signed was a letter of intent. The Defendant argued that the letter of intent was not binding because the parties neve......
  • Aiello v Bleta,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 3 Agosto 2023
    ...as the parties' intentions can be ascertained as to any further terms of the agreement. In [ Prolink Broker Network Inc. v. Jaitley, 2013 ONSC 4497], the only document signed was a letter of intent. The Defendant argued that the letter of intent was not binding because the parties neve......
  • Aiello et al. v. Bleta et al.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 31 Mayo 2022
    ...defined by the parties’ interests.” [212]       In Prolink Broker Network Inc. v. Jaitley, 2013 ONSC 4497, the Court considered an alleged oral agreement that the Plaintiff had a 25% interest in Mr. Jaitley’s insurance brokerage. The Defend......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 31 ' August 4)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 8 Agosto 2023
    ...33, Waxman v. Waxman, 44 B.L.R. (3d) 165, 186 O.A.C. 201 (C.A.), Pecore v. Pecore, 2007 SCC 17, Prolink Broker Network Inc. v. Jaitley, 2013 ONSC 4497, Ruparell v. J. H. Cochrane Investments Inc. et al., 2020 ONSC 7466, Alberta v. Elder Advocates of Alberta Society, 2011 SCC 24, Combe v. Co......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT