Prolink Broker Network Inc. v. Jaitley et al.
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Judge | Goldstein, J. |
| Citation | [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 4497,2013 ONSC 4497,[2013] O.T.C. Uned. 4497 (SC) |
| Date | 02 July 2013 |
| Subject Matter | CONTRACTS |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 31 ' August 4)
...33, Waxman v. Waxman, 44 B.L.R. (3d) 165, 186 O.A.C. 201 (C.A.), Pecore v. Pecore, 2007 SCC 17, Prolink Broker Network Inc. v. Jaitley, 2013 ONSC 4497, Ruparell v. J. H. Cochrane Investments Inc. et al., 2020 ONSC 7466, Alberta v. Elder Advocates of Alberta Society, 2011 SCC 24, Combe v. Co......
-
Seelster Farms et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen and OLG
...of the agreement between the parties to be enforceable. Ontario makes also makes reference to Prolink Broker Network Inc. v. Jaitley, 2013 ONSC 4497, where R.F. Goldstein J. held that there must be an intention to create a legally binding relationship, and an agreement on all of the essenti......
-
Aiello et al. v. Bleta et al.
...defined by the parties’ interests.” [212]       In Prolink Broker Network Inc. v. Jaitley, 2013 ONSC 4497, the Court considered an alleged oral agreement that the Plaintiff had a 25% interest in Mr. Jaitley’s insurance brokerage. The Defend......
-
Wang v. Tribute (Grandview) Ltd
...(3d) 561, 2013 CarswellOnt 2605 (C.A.). The basic principles were also summarized by Goldstein J. Prolink Broker Network Inc. v. Jaitley, 2013 ONSC 4497 (CanLII) at para. • An anticipatory breach does not necessarily terminate a valid contract; • Whether a party has repudiated a contract is......
Get Started for Free
8 cases
-
2023 ONCA 525
...as the parties' intentions can be ascertained as to any further terms of the agreement. In [ Prolink Broker Network Inc. v. Jaitley, 2013 ONSC 4497], the only document signed was a letter of intent. The Defendant argued that the letter of intent was not binding because the parties neve......
-
Seelster Farms et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen and OLG
...of the agreement between the parties to be enforceable. Ontario makes also makes reference to Prolink Broker Network Inc. v. Jaitley, 2013 ONSC 4497, where R.F. Goldstein J. held that there must be an intention to create a legally binding relationship, and an agreement on all of the essenti......
-
Aiello v Bleta
...as the parties' intentions can be ascertained as to any further terms of the agreement. In [ Prolink Broker Network Inc. v. Jaitley, 2013 ONSC 4497], the only document signed was a letter of intent. The Defendant argued that the letter of intent was not binding because the parties neve......
-
Aiello et al. v. Bleta et al.
...defined by the parties’ interests.” [212]       In Prolink Broker Network Inc. v. Jaitley, 2013 ONSC 4497, the Court considered an alleged oral agreement that the Plaintiff had a 25% interest in Mr. Jaitley’s insurance brokerage. The Defend......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 31 ' August 4)
...33, Waxman v. Waxman, 44 B.L.R. (3d) 165, 186 O.A.C. 201 (C.A.), Pecore v. Pecore, 2007 SCC 17, Prolink Broker Network Inc. v. Jaitley, 2013 ONSC 4497, Ruparell v. J. H. Cochrane Investments Inc. et al., 2020 ONSC 7466, Alberta v. Elder Advocates of Alberta Society, 2011 SCC 24, Combe v. Co......