Qadeer et al. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 285

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeSouthcott, J.
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Subject MatterADMINISTRATIVE LAW,LABOUR LAW,CIVIL RIGHTS,IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE
Citation2016 FC 285
Date07 March 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Haider v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 686
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 4, 2018
    ...and Immigration), [2002] FCJ No 675 at paras 14-17 (“Sadeghi”); Rani at para 18; Qadeer v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 285 (“Qadeer”)) and by failing to provide the Applicant with an opportunity to respond to that concern. Notice was required as the concern did not arise di......
  • Feng v Saskatchewan (Economy), 2020 SKCA 6
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • January 9, 2020
    ...Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 1373 at para 5; Qadeer v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 285 at para 25, 44 Imm LR (4th) 208; Mursalim v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 264 at para 24, 39 Imm LR (4t......
2 cases
  • Feng v Saskatchewan (Economy), 2020 SKCA 6
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • January 9, 2020
    ...Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 1373 at para 5; Qadeer v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 285 at para 25, 44 Imm LR (4th) 208; Mursalim v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 264 at para 24, 39 Imm LR (4t......
  • Haider v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 686
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 4, 2018
    ...and Immigration), [2002] FCJ No 675 at paras 14-17 (“Sadeghi”); Rani at para 18; Qadeer v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 285 (“Qadeer”)) and by failing to provide the Applicant with an opportunity to respond to that concern. Notice was required as the concern did not arise di......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT