A.R.J. v. Z.S.J.,

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeSavage, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Citation2009 BCSC 1662,[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1662 (SC),[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1662
Date24 July 2009

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
9 practice notes
  • Spousal Support On or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Fourth Edition
    • September 8, 2011
    ...63 B.C.L.R. (2d) 247, 9 B.C.A.C. 203; Hodgkinson v. Hodgkinson , 2006 BCCA 158, 53 B.C.L.R. (4th) 52 at para. 69, A.R.J. v. Z.S.J ., 2009 BCSC 1662; Bot v. Bot , 2010 ONSC 3805. 16 2009 BCSC 1163; see also Fallis v. Fallis , 2000 BCSC 1446; Foster-Jacques v. Jacques , 2011 NSSC 43; Poirier ......
  • Determination of Income; Disclosure of Income
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2012
    • August 31, 2012
    ...of personal services corporation imputed to parent where the corporation was used to build up substantial savings); A.R.J. v. Z.S.J ., 2009 BCSC 1662 (application for interim child and spousal support). 282 Nesbitt v. Nesbitt , [2001] M.J. No. 291 (C.A.); Gray v. Gray , [2002] M.J. No. 274 ......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2012
    • August 31, 2012
    ...v. D.L.J., 2009 ABQB 22, [2009] A.J. No. 354 ..................................................................365 A.R.J. v. Z.S.J., 2009 BCSC 1662 .................................................................................................... 163 A.S.H. v. S.L.H., [1999] A.J. No. 1484......
  • Spousal Support On or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Fifth Edition
    • August 29, 2013
    ...[2004] OJ No 2227 (Div Ct). 344 2006 BCCA 494; see also Bozak v Bozak , [2008] BCJ No 2080 (SC); Jens v Jens , 2008 BCCA 392; ARJ v ZSJ , 2009 BCSC 1662 (interim support); Lazorek v Quinn , 2010 BCSC 668; Holmes v Matkovich , 2008 YKCA 10. Compare DLC v FMC , 2011 BCCA 444. 345 Flieger v Ad......
  • Get Started for Free
4 cases
  • Hodgkinson v. Hodgkinson
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 13, 2011
    ...there are legitimate, if variable, calls on the pre-tax corporate income. This case is thus distinguishable from A.R.J. v. Z.S.J. , 2009 BCSC 1662, and Teja v. Dhanda , 2009 BCCA 198. [65] Because of my view of the evidence, Ms. Perry is also of little assistance in this regard. Her opinion......
  • Reehal v. Reehal
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 23, 2018
    ...“needs” must take into account the family’s wealthy lifestyle, assuming that there are means to meet those needs: A.R.J. v. Z.S.J., 2009 BCSC 1662 at paras. 44-45. [94] Both parties refer to calculations of the low-mid-high range spousal support under the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines......
  • 2025 BCSC 1113
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2025
    ...making a prospective support obligation versus reliance on historical performance, the authority cited by the claimant, A.R.J. v. Z.S.J., 2009 BCSC 1662 discusses both approaches and ultimately only makes an interim order for 38 By contrast, I am making a final order for support for the rel......
  • Bordignon v Bordignon
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 17, 2025
    ...making a prospective support obligation versus reliance on historical performance, the authority cited by the claimant, A.R.J. v. Z.S.J., 2009 BCSC 1662 discusses both approaches and ultimately only makes an interim order for 38 By contrast, I am making a final order for support for the rel......
5 books & journal articles
  • Spousal Support On or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Fourth Edition
    • September 8, 2011
    ...63 B.C.L.R. (2d) 247, 9 B.C.A.C. 203; Hodgkinson v. Hodgkinson , 2006 BCCA 158, 53 B.C.L.R. (4th) 52 at para. 69, A.R.J. v. Z.S.J ., 2009 BCSC 1662; Bot v. Bot , 2010 ONSC 3805. 16 2009 BCSC 1163; see also Fallis v. Fallis , 2000 BCSC 1446; Foster-Jacques v. Jacques , 2011 NSSC 43; Poirier ......
  • Determination of Income; Disclosure of Income
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2012
    • August 31, 2012
    ...of personal services corporation imputed to parent where the corporation was used to build up substantial savings); A.R.J. v. Z.S.J ., 2009 BCSC 1662 (application for interim child and spousal support). 282 Nesbitt v. Nesbitt , [2001] M.J. No. 291 (C.A.); Gray v. Gray , [2002] M.J. No. 274 ......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2012
    • August 31, 2012
    ...v. D.L.J., 2009 ABQB 22, [2009] A.J. No. 354 ..................................................................365 A.R.J. v. Z.S.J., 2009 BCSC 1662 .................................................................................................... 163 A.S.H. v. S.L.H., [1999] A.J. No. 1484......
  • Spousal Support On or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Fifth Edition
    • August 29, 2013
    ...[2004] OJ No 2227 (Div Ct). 344 2006 BCCA 494; see also Bozak v Bozak , [2008] BCJ No 2080 (SC); Jens v Jens , 2008 BCCA 392; ARJ v ZSJ , 2009 BCSC 1662 (interim support); Lazorek v Quinn , 2010 BCSC 668; Holmes v Matkovich , 2008 YKCA 10. Compare DLC v FMC , 2011 BCCA 444. 345 Flieger v Ad......
  • Get Started for Free