A.R.J. v. Z.S.J., 2009 BCSC 1662
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Savage, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | FAMILY LAW |
| Citation | 2009 BCSC 1662,[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1662 (SC),[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1662 |
| Date | 24 July 2009 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Hodgkinson v. Hodgkinson, 2011 BCSC 634
...there are legitimate, if variable, calls on the pre-tax corporate income. This case is thus distinguishable from A.R.J. v. Z.S.J. , 2009 BCSC 1662, and Teja v. Dhanda , 2009 BCCA 198. [65] Because of my view of the evidence, Ms. Perry is also of little assistance in this regard. Her opinion......
-
Reehal v. Reehal, 2018 BCSC 475
...“needs” must take into account the family’s wealthy lifestyle, assuming that there are means to meet those needs: A.R.J. v. Z.S.J., 2009 BCSC 1662 at paras. 44-45. [94] Both parties refer to calculations of the low-mid-high range spousal support under the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines......
2 cases
-
Hodgkinson v. Hodgkinson, 2011 BCSC 634
...there are legitimate, if variable, calls on the pre-tax corporate income. This case is thus distinguishable from A.R.J. v. Z.S.J. , 2009 BCSC 1662, and Teja v. Dhanda , 2009 BCCA 198. [65] Because of my view of the evidence, Ms. Perry is also of little assistance in this regard. Her opinion......
-
Reehal v. Reehal, 2018 BCSC 475
...“needs” must take into account the family’s wealthy lifestyle, assuming that there are means to meet those needs: A.R.J. v. Z.S.J., 2009 BCSC 1662 at paras. 44-45. [94] Both parties refer to calculations of the low-mid-high range spousal support under the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines......
5 books & journal articles
-
Spousal Support On or After Divorce
...[2004] OJ No 2227 (Div Ct). 344 2006 BCCA 494; see also Bozak v Bozak , [2008] BCJ No 2080 (SC); Jens v Jens , 2008 BCCA 392; ARJ v ZSJ , 2009 BCSC 1662 (interim support); Lazorek v Quinn , 2010 BCSC 668; Holmes v Matkovich , 2008 YKCA 10. Compare DLC v FMC , 2011 BCCA 444. 345 Flieger v Ad......
-
Spousal Support On or After Divorce
...63 B.C.L.R. (2d) 247, 9 B.C.A.C. 203; Hodgkinson v. Hodgkinson , 2006 BCCA 158, 53 B.C.L.R. (4th) 52 at para. 69, A.R.J. v. Z.S.J ., 2009 BCSC 1662; Bot v. Bot , 2010 ONSC 3805. 16 2009 BCSC 1163; see also Fallis v. Fallis , 2000 BCSC 1446; Foster-Jacques v. Jacques , 2011 NSSC 43; Poirier ......
-
Spousal Support On or After Divorce
...494; see also Biernacki v Biernacki , 2014 ABQB 501; Bozak v Bozak , [2008] BCJ No 2080 (SC); Jens v Jens , 2008 BCCA 392; ARJ v ZSJ , 2009 BCSC 1662 (interim support); Lazorek v Quinn , 2010 BCSC 668; Berta v Berta , 2014 ONSC 3919; Holmes v Matkovich , 2008 YKCA 10. Compare DLC v FMC , 20......
-
Determination of Income; Disclosure of Income
...of personal services corporation imputed to parent where the corporation was used to build up substantial savings); A.R.J. v. Z.S.J ., 2009 BCSC 1662 (application for interim child and spousal support). 282 Nesbitt v. Nesbitt , [2001] M.J. No. 291 (C.A.); Gray v. Gray , [2002] M.J. No. 274 ......
Request a trial to view additional results