R v Abbasi, 2020 MBCA 119
| Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
| Judge | Madam Justice Freda M. Steel,Mr. Justice Christopher J. Mainella,Madam Justice Karen I. Simonsen |
| Docket Number | AR18-30-09100 |
| Citation | 2020 MBCA 119 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
| Date | 03 December 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R v EF,
...2020 ABCA 208), and courts across Canada (R v Plehanov, 2020 BCCA 249; R v Alfred, 2021 BCCA 71; R v KNDW, 2020 MBCA 52; R v Abbasi, 2020 MBCA 119; R v Crane, 2021 PESC 1; and R c AC, 2021 QCCQ 4659 at paras 31-5). That there has been a paradigm shift is no longer up for [31] It is worth re......
-
R v Bunn,
...and a trial judge’s credibility findings are owed great deference (see R v Jovel, 2019 MBCA 116 at paras 37-38; and R v Abbasi, 2020 MBCA 119 at para 20). In Jovel, Mainella JA stated that the appellate court must “take care to not overstep its role and retry the case; a......
2 cases
-
R v EF,
...2020 ABCA 208), and courts across Canada (R v Plehanov, 2020 BCCA 249; R v Alfred, 2021 BCCA 71; R v KNDW, 2020 MBCA 52; R v Abbasi, 2020 MBCA 119; R v Crane, 2021 PESC 1; and R c AC, 2021 QCCQ 4659 at paras 31-5). That there has been a paradigm shift is no longer up for [31] It is worth re......
-
R v Bunn,
...and a trial judge’s credibility findings are owed great deference (see R v Jovel, 2019 MBCA 116 at paras 37-38; and R v Abbasi, 2020 MBCA 119 at para 20). In Jovel, Mainella JA stated that the appellate court must “take care to not overstep its role and retry the case; a......