R. v. Anderson (F.), [2014] N.R. TBEd. JN.004
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, C.J.C., LeBel, Abella, Cromwell, Moldaver, Karakatsanis and Wagner, JJ. |
| Citation | [2014] N.R. TBEd. JN.004,2014 SCC 41,[2014] SCJ No 41 (QL),[2014] 3 CNLR 267,458 NR 1,311 CCC (3d) 1,[2014] 2 SCR 167 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Date | 06 June 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
34 practice notes
-
M.M. v. Canada (Minister of Justice), [2015] N.R. TBEd. DE.014
...sentence that would be imposed in a foreign state with the likely sentence that would be imposed in Canada": R. v. Anderson , [2014] 2 S.C.R. 167, at para. 27 (emphasis deleted). Other cases have suggested that the potential hardship to the person sought and the impact of surrender on ......
-
R v Hills,
...in the legal process, particularly at the appellate stage, through no fault of the offender: R v Anderson, 2014 SCC 41, [2014] 2 SCR 167; R v Proulx, 2000 SCC 5, [2000] 1 SCR 61; R v McMillan, 2016 MBCA 12, 326 Man R (2d) 56; R v Shi, 2015 ONCA 646, 2015 CarswellOn......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 18 - 22, 2022)
...Law Society of Upper Canada,2018 SCC 33, Groia v. Law Society of Upper Canada, 2018 SCC 27, R. v. Cunningham, 2010 SCC 10, R. v. Anderson, 2014 SCC 41 Waxman v. Waxman , 2022 ONCA 311 Keywords: Civil Procedure, Settlements, Duty to Disclose, Summary Judgment, Permanent Stays, Abuse of Proce......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 11 ' 15, 2020)
...In Writing, COVID-19, Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, ss 2-9, 132-134, Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 61, R. v. Anderson, 2014 SCC 41, R. v. Cunningham, 2010 SCC 10, R. v. 974649 Ontario Inc., 2001 SCC 81, Courts of Justice Act, Rules of Civil Procedure, Practice Direction Rega......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
M.M. v. Canada (Minister of Justice), [2015] N.R. TBEd. DE.014
...sentence that would be imposed in a foreign state with the likely sentence that would be imposed in Canada": R. v. Anderson , [2014] 2 S.C.R. 167, at para. 27 (emphasis deleted). Other cases have suggested that the potential hardship to the person sought and the impact of surrender on ......
-
R v Hills,
...in the legal process, particularly at the appellate stage, through no fault of the offender: R v Anderson, 2014 SCC 41, [2014] 2 SCR 167; R v Proulx, 2000 SCC 5, [2000] 1 SCR 61; R v McMillan, 2016 MBCA 12, 326 Man R (2d) 56; R v Shi, 2015 ONCA 646, 2015 CarswellOn......
-
Henry v. British Columbia (Attorney General) et al., [2015] N.R. TBEd. MY.001
...of core prosecutorial discretion is immune from judicial review, subject only to the doctrine of abuse of process: see R. v. Anderson , 2014 SCC 41, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 167, at para. 48; Krieger v. Law Society of Alberta , 2002 SCC 65, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 372, at para. 32. Abuse of process may be f......
-
Henry v. British Columbia (Attorney General) et al., 383 DLR (4th) 383
...of core prosecutorial discretion is immune from judicial review, subject only to the doctrine of abuse of process: see R. v. Anderson , 2014 SCC 41, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 167, at para. 48; Krieger v. Law Society of Alberta , 2002 SCC 65, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 372, at para. 32. Abuse of process may be f......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 18 - 22, 2022)
...Law Society of Upper Canada,2018 SCC 33, Groia v. Law Society of Upper Canada, 2018 SCC 27, R. v. Cunningham, 2010 SCC 10, R. v. Anderson, 2014 SCC 41 Waxman v. Waxman , 2022 ONCA 311 Keywords: Civil Procedure, Settlements, Duty to Disclose, Summary Judgment, Permanent Stays, Abuse of Proce......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 11 ' 15, 2020)
...In Writing, COVID-19, Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, ss 2-9, 132-134, Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 61, R. v. Anderson, 2014 SCC 41, R. v. Cunningham, 2010 SCC 10, R. v. 974649 Ontario Inc., 2001 SCC 81, Courts of Justice Act, Rules of Civil Procedure, Practice Direction Rega......
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 14 18, 2019)
...1990, Reg 851, s 85(a), Provincial Offences Act, RSO 1990, c P.33, R v Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64, R v M (CA), [1996] 1 SCR 500, R v Anderson, 2014 SCC 41, Re BC Motor Vehicle Act, [1985] 2 SCR 486, R v Ipeelee, 2012 SCC 13, [2012] 1 SCR 433, R v Cotton Felts Ltd (1982), 2 CCC (3d) 287 (Ont CA), ......
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 27 December, 1 2017)
...Notice of Constitutional Question, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 7 and s. 11(b), Criminal Code s. 163.1(3), R. v. Anderson, 2014 SCC 41, R. v. Jordan, 2016 SCC 27, R. v. Morin, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 77 R v. T.D.A., 2017 ONCA 910 (Publication Ban) [Laskin, Feldman and Blair JJ.A.] Co......
21 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...[1990] 1 SCR 265 ...............................................................................................381 R v Anderson, 2014 SCC 41 ......................................................................................... 78, 79, 355 R v Ansari, 2015 ONCA 575 ...........................
-
Table of cases
...to SCC refused, [2009] SCCA No 428 .................................................................................. 405 R v Anderson, 2014 SCC 41 ...................................................................................47 R v Angelantoni (1975), 28 CCC (2d) 179, 31 CRNS 342 (Ont......
-
Defining the Principles of Fundamental Justice
...Lee (2005), 260 DLR (4th) 123 at para 63 (Ont CA). 147 Rodriguez , above note 47. 148 Compare R v B(SA) , 2003 SCC 60. 149 R v Anderson , 2014 SCC 41, at paras 18–33 [ Anderson ]. FUNDA MENTAL JUSTICE 144 a minimum period of imprisonment under section 255(1)( a )(iii). Had the notice not be......
-
Substantive Principles of Fundamental Justice
...term must be imposed; but if, for whatever reason, the Crown does not notify 618 Ibid at paras 161–70. 619 Ibid . 620 R v Anderson , 2014 SCC 41 [ Anderson ]. FUNDAMENTAL JUSTICE 270 the accused, the sentencing judge would not be required to impose it. The Court rejected the accused’s argum......
Request a trial to view additional results