R. v. Awa (L.), 2005 NUCJ 27
Judge | Johnson, J. |
Court | Nunavut Court of Justice (Canada) |
Case Date | May 25, 2005 |
Jurisdiction | Nunavut |
Citations | 2005 NUCJ 27;[2005] Nunavut Cases 27 (CJ) |
R. v. Awa (L.), [2005] Nunavut Cases 27 (CJ)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2005] Nunavut Cases TBEd. DE.042
Her Majesty the Queen (prosecutor) v. Laban Awa (accused)
(08-05-359; 2005 NUCJ 27)
Indexed As: R. v. Awa (L.)
Nunavut Court of Justice
Iqaluit
Johnson, J.
November 30, 2005.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Criminal Law - Topic 3309
Compelling appearance, detention and release - Interim release or detention of accused pending trial or appeal - Release - When available - See paragraphs 7 to 28.
Criminal Law - Topic 3314
Compelling appearance, detention and release - Interim release or detention of accused pending trial or appeal - Hearing - Decision and reasons - See paragraphs 13 to 16.
Cases Noticed:
R. v. K.N., [2005] Nunavut Cases 9 (C.J.), refd to. [para. 1].
R. v. Baker (1973), 13 C.C.C.(2d) 340 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 14].
R. v. Acosta (R.Z.), [2005] B.C.T.C. Uned. 307; 2005 BCSC 620, refd to. [para. 14].
R. v. Sheppard (C.), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 869; 284 N.R. 342; 211 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 50; 633 A.P.R. 50; 162 C.C.C.(3d) 298, refd to. [para. 14].
R. v. Braich (A.) et al., [2002] 1 S.C.R. 903; 285 N.R. 162; 164 B.C.A.C. 1; 268 W.A.C. 1; 162 C.C.C.(3d) 324, refd to. [para. 14].
Authors and Works Noticed:
Trotter, Gary T., The Law of Bail in Canada (2nd Ed. 1999), pp. 137, 138 [para. 17, footnote 1]; 139, 140 [para. 18]; 204, 206 [para. 20].
Counsel:
John Solski, for the prosecutor;
Andy Mahar, for the accused.
This application was heard on May 25, 2005, by Johnson, J., of the Nunavut Court of Justice, who released the following judgment on November 30, 2005.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Learning From Those on the Ice: The Impact of Bill C-75 on Nunavummiut.
.... (65) Sheehy, supra note 64, s 4. (66) AFPAD, supra note 64 at 3-4. (67) VRRWS, supra note 64 at 5. (68) Ibid. (69) See e.g. R v A(L), 2005 NUCJ 27. Crown counsel must also consider the probability of the accused reoffending per section 515(10)(b) of the Criminal (70) R v A(L), 2005 NUCJ 2......
-
R. v. Teemotee (R.L.), 2011 NUCJ 17
...of justice in Nunavut. They deal with high volumes of work, under significant time constraints. [5] As stated by this court in R v A(L), 2005 NUCJ 27 at para 15, 68 WCB (2d) 71 [A(L)]: The content of the reasons in a bail hearing, conducted by Justices of the Peace in Nunavut who have littl......
-
Vancouver v. Picadilly Inv. Ltd., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 245
...from the City of Vancouver. 11 Apr 2005 Inspection of the Hotel by Adrian Buchanan pursuant to the Standards of Maintenance bylaw 27 Apr 2005 Letter from the City of Vancouver to the Defendant. 01 Jun 2005 Re-inspection or follow-up of the above letter inspection of the Hotel. 09 Jun 2005 O......
-
R. v. Sewoee (K.), [2014] Nunavut Cases Uned. 26
...The Respondent argues that, while the JP Main's reasons were brief, they are sufficient to permit appellate review. As noted in R v A (L), 2005 NUCJ 27, 68 WCB (2d) 71 [AL], the content of the reasons of a justice of the peace should be set at a lower level than for legally trained provinci......
-
R. v. Teemotee (R.L.), 2011 NUCJ 17
...of justice in Nunavut. They deal with high volumes of work, under significant time constraints. [5] As stated by this court in R v A(L), 2005 NUCJ 27 at para 15, 68 WCB (2d) 71 [A(L)]: The content of the reasons in a bail hearing, conducted by Justices of the Peace in Nunavut who have littl......
-
Vancouver v. Picadilly Inv. Ltd., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 245
...from the City of Vancouver. 11 Apr 2005 Inspection of the Hotel by Adrian Buchanan pursuant to the Standards of Maintenance bylaw 27 Apr 2005 Letter from the City of Vancouver to the Defendant. 01 Jun 2005 Re-inspection or follow-up of the above letter inspection of the Hotel. 09 Jun 2005 O......
-
R. v. Sewoee (K.), [2014] Nunavut Cases Uned. 26
...The Respondent argues that, while the JP Main's reasons were brief, they are sufficient to permit appellate review. As noted in R v A (L), 2005 NUCJ 27, 68 WCB (2d) 71 [AL], the content of the reasons of a justice of the peace should be set at a lower level than for legally trained provinci......
-
Learning From Those on the Ice: The Impact of Bill C-75 on Nunavummiut.
.... (65) Sheehy, supra note 64, s 4. (66) AFPAD, supra note 64 at 3-4. (67) VRRWS, supra note 64 at 5. (68) Ibid. (69) See e.g. R v A(L), 2005 NUCJ 27. Crown counsel must also consider the probability of the accused reoffending per section 515(10)(b) of the Criminal (70) R v A(L), 2005 NUCJ 2......