R. v. B.E.

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
JudgeWilliams
Citation2019 BCSC 1442
Docket Number3371-2
Date27 June 2019

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
6 practice notes
  • R. v. Danjou
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 13, 2020
    ...motive and intent: Griffin at para. 63, citing R. v. Pasqualino, 2008 ONCA 554 at para. 31. As Williams J. said in R. v. B.E., 2019 BCSC 1442: [90]      … [E]vidence of motive may nonetheless be relevant and probative to the matter of (1)&......
  • R v So
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • March 14, 2024
    ...automatism may nonetheless raise a reasonable doubt as to whether the accused had the requisite intent for murder ( R. v. B.E., 2019 BCSC 1442 at para. 105; R. v. Robinson, 2010 BCSC 368 at para. 107; R. v. Brown, 2006 BCSC 1581 at para. 9). The mental condition of the accused at the time o......
  • R. v. Wu
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • May 8, 2020
    ...making this argument, the appellant refers to the decision of this Court in R. v. Reeves, 2017 BCCA 97, and the decision in R. v. B.E., 2019 BCSC 1442. [88] The appellant submits that the judge here made an error similar to the error made in Reeves, where this Court allowed the appeal from ......
  • R. v. So
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 12, 2021
    ...automatism may nonetheless raise a reasonable doubt as to whether the accused had the requisite intent for murder (R. v. B.E., 2019 BCSC 1442 at para. 105; R. v. Robinson, 2010 BCSC 368 at para. 107; R. v. Brown, 2006 BCSC 1581 at para. 9). The mental condition of the accused at the time of......
  • Get Started for Free
6 cases
  • R. v. Danjou
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 13, 2020
    ...motive and intent: Griffin at para. 63, citing R. v. Pasqualino, 2008 ONCA 554 at para. 31. As Williams J. said in R. v. B.E., 2019 BCSC 1442: [90]      … [E]vidence of motive may nonetheless be relevant and probative to the matter of (1)&......
  • R v So
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • March 14, 2024
    ...automatism may nonetheless raise a reasonable doubt as to whether the accused had the requisite intent for murder ( R. v. B.E., 2019 BCSC 1442 at para. 105; R. v. Robinson, 2010 BCSC 368 at para. 107; R. v. Brown, 2006 BCSC 1581 at para. 9). The mental condition of the accused at the time o......
  • R. v. Wu
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • May 8, 2020
    ...making this argument, the appellant refers to the decision of this Court in R. v. Reeves, 2017 BCCA 97, and the decision in R. v. B.E., 2019 BCSC 1442. [88] The appellant submits that the judge here made an error similar to the error made in Reeves, where this Court allowed the appeal from ......
  • R. v. So
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 12, 2021
    ...automatism may nonetheless raise a reasonable doubt as to whether the accused had the requisite intent for murder (R. v. B.E., 2019 BCSC 1442 at para. 105; R. v. Robinson, 2010 BCSC 368 at para. 107; R. v. Brown, 2006 BCSC 1581 at para. 9). The mental condition of the accused at the time of......
  • Get Started for Free