R. v. Balogh (J.B.), [2009] A.R. Uned. 94
| Judge | Matchett, P.C.J. |
| Court | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW |
| Citation | [2009] A.R. Uned. 94,[2009] A.R. Uned. 94 (PC),2009 ABPC 10 |
| Date | 13 January 2009 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 practice notes
-
R. v. Donald (K.), 2010 SKPC 123
...footnote 11]. R. v. Sikorski (1990), 84 Sask.R. 241 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 26, footnote 12]. R. v. Balogh (J.B.), [2009] A.R. Uned. 94; 2009 ABPC 10, refd to. [para. 26, footnote 12]. R. v. Redstar (S.D.), [2009] A.R. Uned. 255; 2009 ABPC 79, refd to. [para. 26, footnote 12]. R. v. MacLeod......
-
R. v. Stang (C.B.), [2012] A.R. Uned. 758 (PC)
...J. commented upon Gundy's history: [29] Gundy has been consistently followed in Alberta: R. v. Graham 2009 ABQB 100; R. v. Balough 2009 ABPC 10; R. v. Kestner 2010 ABPC 3; R. v. Stafford 2010 ABPC 85; R. v. Chipesia 2010 ABPC 75; R. v. Ference 2010 ABPC 99; R. v. Halabi 2011 ABPC 99; R. v. ......
-
R. v. Muhle (K.T.), [2013] A.R. Uned. 290
...on the information available to the officer at the time. See: R. v. Gundy, 2008 ONCA 284, R. v. Graham, 2009 ABQB 100; R. v. Balough, 2009 ABPC 10; R. v. Kestner, 2010 ABPC 3; R. v. Stafford, 2010 ABPC 85; R. v. Chipesia, 2010 ABPC 75; R. v. Ference, 2010 ABPC 99; R. v. Halabi, 2011 ABPC 99......
-
R. v. Korn (R.P.), [2012] A.R. Uned. 145 (PC)
...device was an approved screening device. [29] Gundy has been consistently followed in Alberta: R. v. Graham 2009 ABQB 100 ; R. v. Balough 2009 ABPC 10; R. v. Kestner 2010 ABPC 3; R. v. Stafford 2010 ABPC 85 ; R. v. Chipesia 2010 ABPC 75; R. v. Ference 2010 ABPC 99 ; R. v. Halabi 2011 ABPC 9......
Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
-
R. v. Donald (K.), 2010 SKPC 123
...footnote 11]. R. v. Sikorski (1990), 84 Sask.R. 241 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 26, footnote 12]. R. v. Balogh (J.B.), [2009] A.R. Uned. 94; 2009 ABPC 10, refd to. [para. 26, footnote 12]. R. v. Redstar (S.D.), [2009] A.R. Uned. 255; 2009 ABPC 79, refd to. [para. 26, footnote 12]. R. v. MacLeod......
-
R. v. Stang (C.B.), [2012] A.R. Uned. 758 (PC)
...J. commented upon Gundy's history: [29] Gundy has been consistently followed in Alberta: R. v. Graham 2009 ABQB 100; R. v. Balough 2009 ABPC 10; R. v. Kestner 2010 ABPC 3; R. v. Stafford 2010 ABPC 85; R. v. Chipesia 2010 ABPC 75; R. v. Ference 2010 ABPC 99; R. v. Halabi 2011 ABPC 99; R. v. ......
-
R. v. Muhle (K.T.), [2013] A.R. Uned. 290
...on the information available to the officer at the time. See: R. v. Gundy, 2008 ONCA 284, R. v. Graham, 2009 ABQB 100; R. v. Balough, 2009 ABPC 10; R. v. Kestner, 2010 ABPC 3; R. v. Stafford, 2010 ABPC 85; R. v. Chipesia, 2010 ABPC 75; R. v. Ference, 2010 ABPC 99; R. v. Halabi, 2011 ABPC 99......
-
R. v. Korn (R.P.), [2012] A.R. Uned. 145 (PC)
...device was an approved screening device. [29] Gundy has been consistently followed in Alberta: R. v. Graham 2009 ABQB 100 ; R. v. Balough 2009 ABPC 10; R. v. Kestner 2010 ABPC 3; R. v. Stafford 2010 ABPC 85 ; R. v. Chipesia 2010 ABPC 75; R. v. Ference 2010 ABPC 99 ; R. v. Halabi 2011 ABPC 9......
Request a trial to view additional results