R v Bissky, 2018 SKCA 102

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeJackson,Herauf,Whitmore
Date31 December 2018
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Docket NumberCACR3017, CACR3029
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • Digest: R v Bissky, 2018 SKCA 102
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • December 31, 2018
    ...as: 2018 SKCA 102 Docket Number: CACR 3017|CACR 3029 , CA18100 Court: Court of Appeal Date: 2018-12-31 Judges: Jackson Herauf Whitmore Subjects: Criminal Law � Controlled Drugs and Substances Act � Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking � Conviction � Appeal Digest: The appellant appeale......
  • R v Elson, 2019 ABPC 27
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 1, 2019
    ...R v Campbell, 2010 ONCA 588 (affirmed 2011 SCC  32); R v Sadikov, 2014 ONCA 72; R v Pilbeam, 2018 MBCA 128; and R v Bissky, 2018 SKCA 102. Position of the Defence [137]     Facially, Defence Counsel submits there is not enough information contained in the ITO with r......
  • R v Moyles, 2019 SKCA 72
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • July 30, 2019
    ...on a review by this Court of the decision of a trial judge as to the sufficiency of an ITO to obtain a search warrant. In R v Bissky, 2018 SKCA 102 at paras 9–15, 369 CCC (3d) 315, leave to appeal to SCC dismissed, 2019 CanLII 55716, the Court clarified that standard, concluding with the fo......
  • R v Williams, 2020 SKCA 108
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • September 9, 2020
    ...(at para 59). At the other end of the spectrum, Jackson J.A. concluded a 12-month sentence was not demonstrably unfit in R v Bissky, 2018 SKCA 102, 369 CCC (3d) 315 [Bissky], “[h]aving regard for the trial judge’s finding that Mr. Bissky is not a mid-range trafficker …” (emphasis added, at ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • R v Elson, 2019 ABPC 27
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 1, 2019
    ...R v Campbell, 2010 ONCA 588 (affirmed 2011 SCC  32); R v Sadikov, 2014 ONCA 72; R v Pilbeam, 2018 MBCA 128; and R v Bissky, 2018 SKCA 102. Position of the Defence [137]     Facially, Defence Counsel submits there is not enough information contained in the ITO with r......
  • R v Moyles, 2019 SKCA 72
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • July 30, 2019
    ...on a review by this Court of the decision of a trial judge as to the sufficiency of an ITO to obtain a search warrant. In R v Bissky, 2018 SKCA 102 at paras 9–15, 369 CCC (3d) 315, leave to appeal to SCC dismissed, 2019 CanLII 55716, the Court clarified that standard, concluding with the fo......
  • R v Williams, 2020 SKCA 108
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • September 9, 2020
    ...(at para 59). At the other end of the spectrum, Jackson J.A. concluded a 12-month sentence was not demonstrably unfit in R v Bissky, 2018 SKCA 102, 369 CCC (3d) 315 [Bissky], “[h]aving regard for the trial judge’s finding that Mr. Bissky is not a mid-range trafficker …” (emphasis added, at ......
  • R. v. Hussein, 2020 SKPC 8
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • February 14, 2020
    ...case, yet warrants were found invalid, or reasonable grounds not established. [28] In support of their position, Crown filed R v Bissky, 2018 SKCA 102, 369 CCC (3d) 315 [Bissky]. In Bissky, the ITO included tips from two separate informers whose evidence corroborated each other, both with “......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Digest: R v Bissky, 2018 SKCA 102
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • December 31, 2018
    ...as: 2018 SKCA 102 Docket Number: CACR 3017|CACR 3029 , CA18100 Court: Court of Appeal Date: 2018-12-31 Judges: Jackson Herauf Whitmore Subjects: Criminal Law � Controlled Drugs and Substances Act � Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking � Conviction � Appeal Digest: The appellant appeale......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT