R. v. Bonter (C.W.), 2013 SKQB 31
Judge | Keene, J. |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
Case Date | January 29, 2013 |
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Citations | 2013 SKQB 31;(2013), 412 Sask.R. 209 (QB) |
R. v. Bonter (C.W.) (2013), 412 Sask.R. 209 (QB)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2013] Sask.R. TBEd. FE.023
Che William Bonter (appellant) v. Her Majesty the Queen (respondent)
(2012 Q.B.G. No. 106; 2013 SKQB 31)
Indexed As: R. v. Bonter (C.W.)
Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench
Judicial Centre of Yorkton
Keene, J.
January 29, 2013.
Summary:
Bonter was convicted of impaired driving under s. 253(1)(a) of the Criminal Code. He appealed.
The Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench dismissed the appeal.
Criminal Law - Topic 1362
Motor vehicles - Impaired driving - Evidence and proof - The accused was pulled over after police officers observed him speeding and making a sloppy u-turn - The accused had glassy, squinty eyes, the odour of liquor on his breath, and trouble getting identification out of his wallet - When asked if he had consumed alcohol, the accused admitted that he had been at a bar and said that he was "probably over" - He was arrested for impaired driving and brought to the station for a breath test - The officer called to administer the breath test noted that the accused had red eyes, was slow moving, and had a strong odour of liquor - The accused was convicted by the trial judge - He appealed - The Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench dismissed the appeal - The reasoning in Stellato (1993 Ont. C.A.) applied - There was sufficient evidence of impairment to justify the trial judge's conclusion that the accused's ability to drive was impaired by alcohol.
Cases Noticed:
R. v. Stellato (T.) (1993), 61 O.A.C. 217; 12 O.R.(3d) 90; 78 C.C.C.(3d) 380 (C.A.), affd. [1994] 2 S.C.R. 478; 168 N.R. 190; 72 O.A.C. 140; 18 O.R.(3d) 800, appld. [para. 2].
R. v. MacDonald (D.E.) (1996), 146 Sask.R. 306 (Q.B.), appld. [para. 3].
R. v. Andrews (M.A.) (1996), 178 A.R. 182; 110 W.A.C. 182; 1996 ABCA 23, refd to. [para. 4].
R. v. Yebes, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 168; 78 N.R. 351, refd to. [para. 21].
R. v. Andres, [1982] 2 W.W.R. 249; 1 Sask.R. 96 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 21].
Counsel:
Barrie W. Stricker, for the Crown;
N. Chris MacLeod, for the appellant.
This appeal was heard by Keene, J., of the Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench, Judicial Centre of Yorkton, who delivered the following judgment on January 29, 2013.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Digest: R v Peepeetch, 2018 SKQB 66
...[2011] 3 WWR 656, 359 Sask R 59, 256 CCC (3d) 476, 96 MVR (5th) 48 R v Alex, [2017] 1 SCR 967, 2017 SCC 37, 349 CCC (3d) 383 R v Bonter, 2013 SKQB 31, 412 Sask R 209 R v Brandt, 1997 CarswellAlta 1552, 36 WCB (2d) 422 R v Buettner, 2012 SKPC 142, 408 Sask R 1 R v Buhay, 2003 SCC 30, [2003] ......
-
R. v. Larocque (B.), (2014) 445 Sask.R. 159 (PC)
...2012 SKCA 80, refd to. [para. 16]. R. v. MacDonald (D.E.) (1996), 146 Sask.R. 306 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 17]. R. v. Bonter (C.W.) (2013), 412 Sask.R. 209; 2013 SKQB 31, refd to. [para. 18]. R. v. Savage (M.R.) (2011), 371 Sask.R. 283; 518 W.A.C. 283; 2011 SKCA 65, refd to. [para. 19]. R. v......
-
R. v. Poletz (B.), 2015 SKQB 114
...a motor vehicle. Baynton J.'s approach in MacDonald has been accepted in other decisions of this Court - see: Landes , R. v. Bonter , 2013 SKQB 31, 412 Sask R 209 [ Bonter ], and R. v. Rice , 2011 SKQB 412, 386 Sask R 69. [20] As was pointed out by Keene J. in the Bonter case, in the Pellet......
-
R. v. Larocque (B.), (2014) 445 Sask.R. 159 (PC)
...2012 SKCA 80, refd to. [para. 16]. R. v. MacDonald (D.E.) (1996), 146 Sask.R. 306 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 17]. R. v. Bonter (C.W.) (2013), 412 Sask.R. 209; 2013 SKQB 31, refd to. [para. 18]. R. v. Savage (M.R.) (2011), 371 Sask.R. 283; 518 W.A.C. 283; 2011 SKCA 65, refd to. [para. 19]. R. v......
-
R. v. Poletz (B.), 2015 SKQB 114
...a motor vehicle. Baynton J.'s approach in MacDonald has been accepted in other decisions of this Court - see: Landes , R. v. Bonter , 2013 SKQB 31, 412 Sask R 209 [ Bonter ], and R. v. Rice , 2011 SKQB 412, 386 Sask R 69. [20] As was pointed out by Keene J. in the Bonter case, in the Pellet......
-
R. v. PEEPEETCH, 2018 SKQB 65
...be manifested in observable conduct such as the manner of walking and talking: R v MacDonald (1996), 146 Sask R 306 (Sask QB); R v Bonter, 2013 SKQB 31, 412 Sask R [67] In this case, there is no evidence of highly aberrant driving by Mr. Peepeetch, although Cst. Fay did describe his driving......
-
R. v. Turnmire (D.G.), 2014 SKPC 74
...306 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 8]. R. v. Rice (K.) (2011), 386 Sask.R. 69; 2011 SKQB 412, refd to. [para. 8]. R. v. Bonter (C.W.) (2013), 412 Sask.R. 209; 2013 SKQB 31, refd to. [para. R. v. Meek (S.), [2010] Sask.R. Uned. 141; 2010 SKPC 136, refd to. [para. 8]. Counsel: Brian Hendrickson, Q.C......
-
Digest: R v Peepeetch, 2018 SKQB 66
...[2011] 3 WWR 656, 359 Sask R 59, 256 CCC (3d) 476, 96 MVR (5th) 48 R v Alex, [2017] 1 SCR 967, 2017 SCC 37, 349 CCC (3d) 383 R v Bonter, 2013 SKQB 31, 412 Sask R 209 R v Brandt, 1997 CarswellAlta 1552, 36 WCB (2d) 422 R v Buettner, 2012 SKPC 142, 408 Sask R 1 R v Buhay, 2003 SCC 30, [2003] ......