R. v. Brassington, 2018 SCC 37

JudgeWagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Case DateJuly 20, 2018
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations2018 SCC 37
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
30 practice notes
  • La Presse inc. v. Quebec, 2023 SCC 22
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 6 octobre 2023
    ...[1990] 2 S.C.R. 1421; Orphan Well Association v. Grant Thornton Ltd., 2019 SCC 5, [2019] 1 S.C.R. 150; referred to: R. v. Brassington, 2018 SCC 37, [2018] 2 S.C.R. 616; R. v. J.J., 2022 SCC 28; Vancouver Sun (Re), 2004 SCC 43, [2004] 2 S.C.R. 332; Attorney General of Nova Scotia v. MacIntyr......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Fundamental Justice: Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Second Edition
    • 22 juin 2019
    ...164, 166 R v Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35 ................................................................................ 298 R v Brassington, 2018 SCC 37 ............................................................................ 304 R v Brenton (1999), 180 DLR (4th) 314, [2000] 2 WWR 269, [199......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
    • 23 juin 2020
    ...584 R v Branscombe, 2017 SKCA 71 ......................................................................... 599 R v Brassington, 2018 SCC 37, [2018] 2 SCR 617 ................................................361 R v Breton (1994), 74 OAC 99, 93 CCC (3d) 171, [1994] OJ No 2097 (CA) .......181 ......
  • Procedural Fairness as a Principle of Fundamental Justice
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Fundamental Justice: Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Second Edition
    • 22 juin 2019
    ...63 [ Yumnu ]. 188 On the stringency of the informer privilege and the scope of the innocence-at-stake exception, see R v Brassington , 2018 SCC 37; Named Person v Vancouver Sun , 2007 SCC 43; R v Leipert , [1997] 1 SCR 281. 189 R v Campbell , [1999] 1 SCR 565 at paras 49–54 [ Campbell ]. On......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
22 cases
  • La Presse inc. v. Quebec, 2023 SCC 22
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 6 octobre 2023
    ...[1990] 2 S.C.R. 1421; Orphan Well Association v. Grant Thornton Ltd., 2019 SCC 5, [2019] 1 S.C.R. 150; referred to: R. v. Brassington, 2018 SCC 37, [2018] 2 S.C.R. 616; R. v. J.J., 2022 SCC 28; Vancouver Sun (Re), 2004 SCC 43, [2004] 2 S.C.R. 332; Attorney General of Nova Scotia v. MacIntyr......
  • R v Komoartok, 2020 NUCA 12
    • Canada
    • Nunavut Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • 21 octobre 2020
    ...Act provides for a distinct procedure for Crown privilege claims arising during the course of a criminal trial: compare R v Brassington, 2018 SCC 37, [2018] 2 SCR 616. But the absence of a statutory means of immediate review in Dagenais did not itself authorize a bypass of the limitations o......
  • R. v. Murphy,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 30 mars 2022
    ...“innocence at stake” application would have looked like.  The Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. Brassington, 2018 SCC 37, described the appropriate process to try to pierce informer [36]  The standard for piercing informer privilege – the “innocence at s......
  • R v Pilbeam, 2018 MBCA 128
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • 6 décembre 2018
    ...and eat it too in matters such as this. The authorising judge or justice is part of the “circle” of informant privilege (R v Brassington, 2018 SCC 37 at para 41; see also R v Barros, 2011 SCC 51 at para 37). They are entitled to access the information and are legally obligated to safeguard ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Informer Privilege And An Illustration Of Illegitimate Delay
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 19 juin 2019
    ...Footnotes R v Barros, [2011] 3 SCR 368 at para 37 [Barros]. The decision on the retrial is reported at R v Barros, 2016 ABQB 243. 2018 SCC 37 [Brassington] and [2017] 1 SCR 659 R v Durham Regional Crime Stoppers Inc, [2017] 2 SCR 157 at paras 11 and 22. In Barros, supra note 1 at para 28, t......
5 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Fundamental Justice: Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Second Edition
    • 22 juin 2019
    ...164, 166 R v Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35 ................................................................................ 298 R v Brassington, 2018 SCC 37 ............................................................................ 304 R v Brenton (1999), 180 DLR (4th) 314, [2000] 2 WWR 269, [199......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
    • 23 juin 2020
    ...584 R v Branscombe, 2017 SKCA 71 ......................................................................... 599 R v Brassington, 2018 SCC 37, [2018] 2 SCR 617 ................................................361 R v Breton (1994), 74 OAC 99, 93 CCC (3d) 171, [1994] OJ No 2097 (CA) .......181 ......
  • Procedural Fairness as a Principle of Fundamental Justice
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Fundamental Justice: Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Second Edition
    • 22 juin 2019
    ...63 [ Yumnu ]. 188 On the stringency of the informer privilege and the scope of the innocence-at-stake exception, see R v Brassington , 2018 SCC 37; Named Person v Vancouver Sun , 2007 SCC 43; R v Leipert , [1997] 1 SCR 281. 189 R v Campbell , [1999] 1 SCR 565 at paras 49–54 [ Campbell ]. On......
  • Disclosure and Production
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
    • 23 juin 2020
    ...71 Barros , above note 69 at para 30. 72 Bisaillon , above note 67 at 84 and 88; Basi , above note 68 at para 38. 73 R v Brassington , 2018 SCC 37. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 362 not therefore follow, however, that an accused person is forbidden from making efforts outside the courtroom to determin......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT