R. v. A.C,

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeWatt, Hourigan and Miller JJ.A.
Date05 April 2018
Citation2018 ONCA 333
Docket NumberC60597
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
28 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 23-27)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 11, 2019
    ...No. 216, R. v. Murray, 2017 ONCA 393, R. v. Noureddine, 2015 ONCA 770, R. v. Swite, 2011 BCCA 54, R. v. Evans, 2019 ONCA 715, R. v. A.C., 2018 ONCA 333, R. v. Figliola, 2011 ONCA 457, R. v. Last, 2009 SCC 45, R. v. Puddicombe, 2013 ONCA 506, leave to appeal refused, [2013] S.C.C.A. No 496, ......
  • Examination of Witnesses
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Modern Criminal Evidence
    • May 3, 2021
    ...rule seeks to ensure efficiency and to avoid 538 Ibid at para 124. 539 Ibid . 540 R v MacIsaac , 2017 ONCA 172 at para 58. 541 R v AC , 2018 ONCA 333 at para 46. 542 Ibid ; R v Krause , [1986] 2 SCR 466, 1986 CanLII 39 at paras 17, 21; Trecartin , supra note 472 at paras 20-21. In Samaniego......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...Butts, 2012 ONCA 24 ................................................................................... 126 Table of Cases 719 R v C(A), 2018 ONCA 333 ...................................................................................601 R v C(DAR) (2002), 170 CCC (3d) 64 (PEI CA) ...............
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Modern Criminal Evidence
    • May 3, 2021
    ...AC v Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services) , 2009 SCC 30, [2009] 2 SCR 181 ...479 AC , R v , 2018 ONCA 333 ................................................. 9, 383, 384 AC , R v , 2019 ONSC 4270, 439 CRR (2d) 360 .......................................410 AD1 , R v , 2003 CanLII ......
  • Get Started for Free
18 cases
  • R v Settle
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • June 14, 2021
    ...see eg R v Last, 2009 SCC 45 at paras 17-18, 34, 42, [2009] 3 SCR 146; R v Sciascia, 2017 SCC 57 at para 33, [2017] 2 SCR 539; R v C(A), 2018 ONCA 333 at para 24, 360 CCC (3d) 540. Counts may be kept together for trial purposes, but because they are not ‘similar fact’ situations they may st......
  • R. v. Roth
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • August 27, 2020
    ...that are specifically aimed at testing a witness’s credibility: R. v. Lyttle, 2004 SCC 5 at para. 44; Belcourt at para. 18; R. v. A.C., 2018 ONCA 333 at para. 48; R. v. Lawrence, 2015 BCCA 358 at para. 69, leave to appeal to SCC ref’d, 36756 (14 April 2016). To seek appellate relief based o......
  • R v Haley
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 16, 2025
    ...evidence on issues that relate solely to a witness' credibility on a collateral issue” (emphasis in the original): R. v. A. C., 2018 ONCA 333, 360 C.C.C. (3d) 540, at para. 50; R. v. P. (G.), 95 O.A.C. 200. If the video showed Mr. Whyte chasing the complainant up the stairs, pushing him dow......
  • R. v. Anderson
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • December 7, 2018
    ...4 S.C.R. 333, at pp. 353-354; and R. v. Last, 2009 SCC 45, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 146, at paras. 14-18. [10] As this court held in R. v. A.C., 2018 ONCA 333, at para. 24: “The interests of justice often call for a joint trial as severance has the potential to impair both trial efficiency and the t......
  • Get Started for Free
4 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 23-27)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 11, 2019
    ...No. 216, R. v. Murray, 2017 ONCA 393, R. v. Noureddine, 2015 ONCA 770, R. v. Swite, 2011 BCCA 54, R. v. Evans, 2019 ONCA 715, R. v. A.C., 2018 ONCA 333, R. v. Figliola, 2011 ONCA 457, R. v. Last, 2009 SCC 45, R. v. Puddicombe, 2013 ONCA 506, leave to appeal refused, [2013] S.C.C.A. No 496, ......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 3 – February 7, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • April 8, 2020
    ...v. Riley(1992), 11 O.R. (3d) 151 (C.A.), R. v. C.F., 2017 ONCA 480, R. v. M.T., 2012 ONCA 511, R. v. Strojny, 2019 ONCA 329, R. v. A.C., 2018 ONCA 333 R. v. N., 2020 ONCA 85 Keywords: Criminal Law, Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking, Sentencing, Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, S......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 2- April 6)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • April 11, 2018
    ...Release Pending Leave to Appeal, Supreme Court Act, ss. 40, Criminal Code, ss. 679(3), Appeal Dismissed R v. A.C. (Publication Ban), 2018 ONCA 333 [Watt, Hourigan and Miller JJ.A.] Counsel: David M. Humphrey and Ian B. Kasper, for the appellant Lisa Joyal, for the respondent Keywords: Crimi......
  • What Is The Collateral Fact Rule?
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 29, 2020
    ...collateral fact rule is often misunderstood. As indicated by the Ontario Court of Appeal in R. v. A.C., 2018 ONCA 333, the collateral fact rule has "historically suffered from confusion in its application". In R. v. A.C., the Court of Appeal noted that the collateral fact rule operates to p......
7 books & journal articles
  • Examination of Witnesses
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Modern Criminal Evidence
    • May 3, 2021
    ...rule seeks to ensure efficiency and to avoid 538 Ibid at para 124. 539 Ibid . 540 R v MacIsaac , 2017 ONCA 172 at para 58. 541 R v AC , 2018 ONCA 333 at para 46. 542 Ibid ; R v Krause , [1986] 2 SCR 466, 1986 CanLII 39 at paras 17, 21; Trecartin , supra note 472 at paras 20-21. In Samaniego......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...Butts, 2012 ONCA 24 ................................................................................... 126 Table of Cases 719 R v C(A), 2018 ONCA 333 ...................................................................................601 R v C(DAR) (2002), 170 CCC (3d) 64 (PEI CA) ...............
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Modern Criminal Evidence
    • May 3, 2021
    ...AC v Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services) , 2009 SCC 30, [2009] 2 SCR 181 ...479 AC , R v , 2018 ONCA 333 ................................................. 9, 383, 384 AC , R v , 2019 ONSC 4270, 439 CRR (2d) 360 .......................................410 AD1 , R v , 2003 CanLII ......
  • The Trial Process
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
    • June 23, 2020
    ...475 [ Levogiannis ], citing R v Faid , [1981] 5 WWR 349 (Alta CA), rev’d on other grounds, [1983] 1 SCR 265 [ Faid ]. See also R v AC , 2018 ONCA 333 at para 37: While the default placement of an accused on trial is in the prisoner’s box, there is no presumption in this regard. In every cas......
  • Get Started for Free