R. v. D.K., 2020 ONCA 79
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Watt, Huscroft and Trotter JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2020 ONCA 79 |
| Date | 03 February 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Docket Number | C66287 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
33 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 25 ' 29, 2020)
...2008 SCC 10, R. v. Dinardo, 2008 SCC 24, R. v. Khan, 2017 ONCA 114, R. v. D.C., 2019 ONCA 442, R. v. S.K., 2019 ONCA 776, R. v. D.K., 2020 ONCA 79, R. v. G.C., [2006] O.J. No. 2245 (C.A.), R. v. Ellard, 2009 SCC 27 R. v. L., 2020 ONCA 324 Keywords: Criminal Law, Aggravated Assault, Use of I......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 3 February 7, 2020)
...Costs Criminal Decisions United States v. Okorhi, 2020 ONCA 89 Keywords: Criminal Law, Fraud, Extradition R. v. D.K. (Publication Ban), 2020 ONCA 79 Keywords: Criminal Law, Evidence, Sexual Assault Causing Bodily Harm, Sexual Assault, Evidence, Credibility, Prior Inconsistent Statement, Sen......
-
R. v. F.I.,
...of their contents (R v Dinardo, 2008 SCC 24 at para 36, [2008] 1 SCR 788; R v Stirling, 2008 SCC 10 at para 5, [2008] 1 SCR 272; R v D.K., 2020 ONCA 79 at paras 34-38, 384 CCC (3d) 405). However, a prior consistent statement may be adduced, in limited circumstances, to assist the trier of f......
-
R. v. Cooke, 2020 NSCA 66
...2018 NSCA 72; R. v. G.E.H., 2012 NSCA 69; R. v. Roth, 2020 BCCA 240; R. v. Laing, 2017 NSCA 69; R. v. Alisaleh, 2020 ONCA 597; R. v. D.K., 2020 ONCA 79; R. v. Khelawon, 2006 SCC 57; R. v. Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35; Criminal; Criminal—sexual assault; Evidence—credibility; Evidence—prior consiste......
Request a trial to view additional results
30 cases
-
R. v. F.I.,
...of their contents (R v Dinardo, 2008 SCC 24 at para 36, [2008] 1 SCR 788; R v Stirling, 2008 SCC 10 at para 5, [2008] 1 SCR 272; R v D.K., 2020 ONCA 79 at paras 34-38, 384 CCC (3d) 405). However, a prior consistent statement may be adduced, in limited circumstances, to assist the trier of f......
-
R. v. Cooke, 2020 NSCA 66
...2018 NSCA 72; R. v. G.E.H., 2012 NSCA 69; R. v. Roth, 2020 BCCA 240; R. v. Laing, 2017 NSCA 69; R. v. Alisaleh, 2020 ONCA 597; R. v. D.K., 2020 ONCA 79; R. v. Khelawon, 2006 SCC 57; R. v. Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35; Criminal; Criminal—sexual assault; Evidence—credibility; Evidence—prior consiste......
-
R v McKnight,
...para 61, footnote 5; R v Goldfinch, 2019 SCC 38, [2019] 3 SCR 3 [Goldfinch] at para 88, footnote 10 (per Moldaver J, concurring); R v DK, 2020 ONCA 79 at para 52, citing R v LS, 2017 ONCA 685 at paras 77-81. [231] However, s 276 does not apply to sexual a......
-
R. v. J.R.G, 2020 ONSC 841
...it is admissible, it is imperative that it be strictly circumscribed: R. v Dinardo, 2008 SCC 24 at para. 37, [2008] 1 SCR 788; R. v. D.K. 2020 ONCA 79 at paras. 27-46; R. v. D.C. 2019 ONCA 442 at paras. 19-24; R. v. P. (M.) (2001) 151 C.C.C. (3d) 193, 52 O.R. (3d) 631 (C.A.), at paras. 22-2......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 25 ' 29, 2020)
...2008 SCC 10, R. v. Dinardo, 2008 SCC 24, R. v. Khan, 2017 ONCA 114, R. v. D.C., 2019 ONCA 442, R. v. S.K., 2019 ONCA 776, R. v. D.K., 2020 ONCA 79, R. v. G.C., [2006] O.J. No. 2245 (C.A.), R. v. Ellard, 2009 SCC 27 R. v. L., 2020 ONCA 324 Keywords: Criminal Law, Aggravated Assault, Use of I......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 3 February 7, 2020)
...Costs Criminal Decisions United States v. Okorhi, 2020 ONCA 89 Keywords: Criminal Law, Fraud, Extradition R. v. D.K. (Publication Ban), 2020 ONCA 79 Keywords: Criminal Law, Evidence, Sexual Assault Causing Bodily Harm, Sexual Assault, Evidence, Credibility, Prior Inconsistent Statement, Sen......
-
Court Of Appeal Cautions Counsel And Trial Judges About The Danger Of Loose Thinking About Admissibility Of Evidence - Orders A New Trial In Attempted Murder Case
...probative value, ii) they are often self-serving, and iii) they are hearsay (R. v. Stirling, at para. 5, recently confirmed in R v. DK, 2020 ONCA 79, at para. 33). While generally prohibited, prior consistent statements can admitted in very limited Noting that prior consistent statements we......