R. v. Campbell, 2020 NUCJ 28
| Jurisdiction | Nunavut |
| Judge | Madam Justice Charlesworth |
| Citation | 2020 NUCJ 28 |
| Court | Nunavut Court of Justice (Canada) |
| Date | 15 June 2020 |
| Docket Number | 08-19-503, 08-20-37, 08-19-553, 08-20-09, 08-19-465 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
R v Mella,
...2021 ABQB 461 R v Julom, 2021 ABPC 137 R v Zhu, 2021 ABPC 252 R v Bell, 2020 ONSC 2632 R v Joshua Barreira, 2020 ONSC 6558 R v Campbell, 2020 NUCJ 28 R v Bah, 2020 QCCQ 2199 R v Suter, 2018 SCC 34 R v Pham, 2013 SCC 15 R v EF, 2021 ABQB 639 R v Hearns, 2020 ONSC 2365 [59] &......
-
R. v. Pangon, 2020 NUCJ 30
...of the current pandemic. [19] This decision follows on that of my colleague, Madam Justice Charlesworth’s decision in R v Campbell, 2020 NUCJ 28 albeit with a slightly different [20] There are two types of situation where the issue arises: 1. The first involves accused persons who have not ......
-
R. v. Panipakoocho,
...lock-downs of remand facilities that were required as a result. As noted in decisions from mid-2020 such as my decision of R. v. Campbell, 2020 NUCJ 28 and Chief Justice Sharkey’s decision of R. v. Pangon, 2020 NUCJ 30 (and cases cited in each) conditions in remand facilities were ve......
-
R. v. Kolola,
...supra note 1, s. 742.1. [34] Transcript of Proceedings, supra note 4 at 35-36, 41. [35] 2020 ONSC 2365. [36] 2020 NUCJ 30 [Pangon]. [37] 2020 NUCJ 28 [38] Ibid at para 32. [39] Pangon, supra note 36 at para 75. [40] Ibid at para 100. [41] R v Nookiguak, 2005 NUCJ 16 at para 9. [42] See R v ......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
R v Mella,
...2021 ABQB 461 R v Julom, 2021 ABPC 137 R v Zhu, 2021 ABPC 252 R v Bell, 2020 ONSC 2632 R v Joshua Barreira, 2020 ONSC 6558 R v Campbell, 2020 NUCJ 28 R v Bah, 2020 QCCQ 2199 R v Suter, 2018 SCC 34 R v Pham, 2013 SCC 15 R v EF, 2021 ABQB 639 R v Hearns, 2020 ONSC 2365 [59] &......
-
R. v. Pangon, 2020 NUCJ 30
...of the current pandemic. [19] This decision follows on that of my colleague, Madam Justice Charlesworth’s decision in R v Campbell, 2020 NUCJ 28 albeit with a slightly different [20] There are two types of situation where the issue arises: 1. The first involves accused persons who have not ......
-
R. v. Panipakoocho,
...lock-downs of remand facilities that were required as a result. As noted in decisions from mid-2020 such as my decision of R. v. Campbell, 2020 NUCJ 28 and Chief Justice Sharkey’s decision of R. v. Pangon, 2020 NUCJ 30 (and cases cited in each) conditions in remand facilities were ve......
-
R. v. Kolola,
...supra note 1, s. 742.1. [34] Transcript of Proceedings, supra note 4 at 35-36, 41. [35] 2020 ONSC 2365. [36] 2020 NUCJ 30 [Pangon]. [37] 2020 NUCJ 28 [38] Ibid at para 32. [39] Pangon, supra note 36 at para 75. [40] Ibid at para 100. [41] R v Nookiguak, 2005 NUCJ 16 at para 9. [42] See R v ......
Request a trial to view additional results