R v Chang, 2017 ABQB 348
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice M. David Gates |
| Citation | 2017 ABQB 348 |
| Date | 26 May 2017 |
| Docket Number | 140032350Q1 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
Right to Counsel: Implementational Obligations
...note 41 at para 9 (cited to ONCA); R v Shang En Wu , 2017 ONSC 1003 at para 78; Keshavarz , supra note 89 at paras 74, 78; R v Chang , 2017 ABQB 348 at paras 68-75, af ’d 2019 ABCA 315. 150 Lira , ibid . See also R v Patterson , 2006 BCCA 24 at paras 41, 42. 151 Rover , infra note 153 at pa......
-
Table of Cases
...ONSC 8516, leave to appeal to ONCA refused, 2022 ONCA 241 ......................................................... 274 Chang , R v , 2017 ABQB 348, af ’d 2019 ABCA 315 ................................ 381 Channa , R v , 2022 ONSC 7153 ......................................... 378-79, 386 C......
-
Analyzing the Law of Police Dynamic Entry in Canada.
...the dynamic entry was not overwhelming. However, on balance, I am not prepared to find that it was unreasonable" (ibid at para 43). (60.) 2017 ABQB 348 [R v Chang (61.) See ibid at paras 8, 36. (62.) See ibid at paras 9-10, 13, 128. (63.) See ibid at paras 8-11, 13, 128. (64.) See ibid at p......
-
R v Chang
...of the Charter. On September 2, 2016, the trial judge dismissed the Charter applications; written reasons issued May 25, 2017: R v Chang, 2017 ABQB 348 [Chang No [7] Also on September 2, 2016, the appellant asked the trial judge to revisit his 11(b) decision in light of the July 8, 2016 iss......
Get Started for Free
4 cases
-
R v Chang
...of the Charter. On September 2, 2016, the trial judge dismissed the Charter applications; written reasons issued May 25, 2017: R v Chang, 2017 ABQB 348 [Chang No [7] Also on September 2, 2016, the appellant asked the trial judge to revisit his 11(b) decision in light of the July 8, 2016 iss......
-
R. v. Stone-Lacroix
...the accused an opportunity to contact counsel (see also R. v. Learning, 2010 ONSC 3816, [2010] O.J. No. 3092 (QL), and R. v. Chang, 2017 ABQB 348). [52] “Clearly in control” has been interpreted as “control of the premises to be searched, control of the firearms-related evidence to be seize......
-
R v Bailey
...the house to be searched and the people and the firearms within a relatively short period of time. Recently, Justice Gates in R v Chang, 2017 ABQB 348, discussed the meaning of “clearly in control” at para 64:The phrase “clearly in control” has been interpreted as “control of the premises t......
-
R. v. Deverze, 2022 ABPC 13
...Underlying Delay in Access to Counsel [66]        Summary of principles as stated in R v Chang, 2017 ABQB 348: -       A delay in access to counsel constitutes a prima facie breach of Section 10(b) and shifts the burden to the......
3 books & journal articles
-
Right to Counsel: Implementational Obligations
...note 41 at para 9 (cited to ONCA); R v Shang En Wu , 2017 ONSC 1003 at para 78; Keshavarz , supra note 89 at paras 74, 78; R v Chang , 2017 ABQB 348 at paras 68-75, af ’d 2019 ABCA 315. 150 Lira , ibid . See also R v Patterson , 2006 BCCA 24 at paras 41, 42. 151 Rover , infra note 153 at pa......
-
Table of Cases
...ONSC 8516, leave to appeal to ONCA refused, 2022 ONCA 241 ......................................................... 274 Chang , R v , 2017 ABQB 348, af ’d 2019 ABCA 315 ................................ 381 Channa , R v , 2022 ONSC 7153 ......................................... 378-79, 386 C......
-
Analyzing the Law of Police Dynamic Entry in Canada.
...the dynamic entry was not overwhelming. However, on balance, I am not prepared to find that it was unreasonable" (ibid at para 43). (60.) 2017 ABQB 348 [R v Chang (61.) See ibid at paras 8, 36. (62.) See ibid at paras 9-10, 13, 128. (63.) See ibid at paras 8-11, 13, 128. (64.) See ibid at p......