R v Chang, 2017 ABQB 348
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice M. David Gates |
| Citation | 2017 ABQB 348 |
| Docket Number | 140032350Q1 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 26 May 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Analyzing the Law of Police Dynamic Entry in Canada.
...the dynamic entry was not overwhelming. However, on balance, I am not prepared to find that it was unreasonable" (ibid at para 43). (60.) 2017 ABQB 348 [R v Chang (61.) See ibid at paras 8, 36. (62.) See ibid at paras 9-10, 13, 128. (63.) See ibid at paras 8-11, 13, 128. (64.) See ibid at p......
-
R v Chang, 2019 ABCA 315
...of the Charter. On September 2, 2016, the trial judge dismissed the Charter applications; written reasons issued May 25, 2017: R v Chang, 2017 ABQB 348 [Chang No [7] Also on September 2, 2016, the appellant asked the trial judge to revisit his 11(b) decision in light of the July 8, 2016 iss......
-
R. v. Stone-Lacroix, 2017 MBQB 168
...the accused an opportunity to contact counsel (see also R. v. Learning, 2010 ONSC 3816, [2010] O.J. No. 3092 (QL), and R. v. Chang, 2017 ABQB 348). [52] “Clearly in control” has been interpreted as “control of the premises to be searched, control of the firearms-related evidence to be seize......
-
R. v. Deverze,
...Underlying Delay in Access to Counsel [66] Summary of principles as stated in R v Chang, 2017 ABQB 348: - A delay in access to counsel constitutes a prima facie breach of Section 10(b) and shifts the burden to the......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
R v Chang, 2019 ABCA 315
...of the Charter. On September 2, 2016, the trial judge dismissed the Charter applications; written reasons issued May 25, 2017: R v Chang, 2017 ABQB 348 [Chang No [7] Also on September 2, 2016, the appellant asked the trial judge to revisit his 11(b) decision in light of the July 8, 2016 iss......
-
R. v. Stone-Lacroix, 2017 MBQB 168
...the accused an opportunity to contact counsel (see also R. v. Learning, 2010 ONSC 3816, [2010] O.J. No. 3092 (QL), and R. v. Chang, 2017 ABQB 348). [52] “Clearly in control” has been interpreted as “control of the premises to be searched, control of the firearms-related evidence to be seize......
-
R. v. Deverze,
...Underlying Delay in Access to Counsel [66] Summary of principles as stated in R v Chang, 2017 ABQB 348: - A delay in access to counsel constitutes a prima facie breach of Section 10(b) and shifts the burden to the......
-
R v Bailey, 2017 ABQB 693
...the house to be searched and the people and the firearms within a relatively short period of time. Recently, Justice Gates in R v Chang, 2017 ABQB 348, discussed the meaning of “clearly in control” at para 64:The phrase “clearly in control” has been interpreted as “control of the premises t......
1 books & journal articles
-
Analyzing the Law of Police Dynamic Entry in Canada.
...the dynamic entry was not overwhelming. However, on balance, I am not prepared to find that it was unreasonable" (ibid at para 43). (60.) 2017 ABQB 348 [R v Chang (61.) See ibid at paras 8, 36. (62.) See ibid at paras 9-10, 13, 128. (63.) See ibid at paras 8-11, 13, 128. (64.) See ibid at p......