R v Chang, 2019 ABCA 315
| Judge | Schutz,Pentelechuk,Antonio |
| Docket Number | 1701-0164-A |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 29 August 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
21 practice notes
-
Table of cases
...160, 168 R v Chaisson, 2005 NLCA 55, rev’d 2006 SCC 11 .............................. 160, 297, 410 R v Chang, 2019 ABCA 315 .................................................................................. 35 R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11 ..................................................... ......
-
Nature of the Interaction Between Police and Individuals
...that law. Police oicers cannot be expected to undertake a comprehensive 114 Nasogaluak , above note 112 at para 35. See also R v Chang , 2019 ABCA 315. 115 R v Canada (Royal Canadian Mounted Police ) (1981), 60 CCC (2d) 211 (BCCA) [ R v Canada ]. 116 Crampton , above note 106 at para 45. 11......
-
R v Holdsworth, 2019 ABQB 856
...Cornell is the leading case on what are called “no-knock” or “hard entries”. Our Court of Appeal recently applied Cornell in R v Chang, 2019 ABCA 315 at para 87, summarizing the law as [A]bsent “exigent circumstances”, police must knock and announce before forcing entry into a dwelling hous......
-
R v Poxleitner, 2020 ABCA 136
...Regan, 2018 ABCA 55 at paras 32-34, 359 CCC (3d) 53; R v Klassen, 2018 ABCA 258 at para 50 (applying Regan), 364 CCC (3d) 92; R v Chang, 2019 ABCA 315 at paras 24-25 (also applying Regan), 378 CCC (3d) [59] This Court has also addressed defence delay in various contexts. For example, Klasse......
Request a trial to view additional results
18 cases
-
R v Holdsworth, 2019 ABQB 856
...Cornell is the leading case on what are called “no-knock” or “hard entries”. Our Court of Appeal recently applied Cornell in R v Chang, 2019 ABCA 315 at para 87, summarizing the law as [A]bsent “exigent circumstances”, police must knock and announce before forcing entry into a dwelling hous......
-
R v Poxleitner, 2020 ABCA 136
...Regan, 2018 ABCA 55 at paras 32-34, 359 CCC (3d) 53; R v Klassen, 2018 ABCA 258 at para 50 (applying Regan), 364 CCC (3d) 92; R v Chang, 2019 ABCA 315 at paras 24-25 (also applying Regan), 378 CCC (3d) [59] This Court has also addressed defence delay in various contexts. For example, Klasse......
-
R v Osman,
...overriding error, although extricable questions of law are reviewable for correctness: R v Way, 2022 ABCA 1 at para 10; R v Chang, 2019 ABCA 315 at para 24. [52] The Court defers to the trial judge’s fact findings unless they disclose pa......
-
R. v. Virk,
...at paras. 24 and 52; R. v. Mouchayleh, 2017 NSCA 51 at paras. 20–25; Béliveau c. R., 2016 QCCA 1549 at paras. 112–114; and R. v. Chang, 2019 ABCA 315 at para. 42. [39] It is not clear that consent to a date, without more, results in a presumption of waiver. In concurring reasons in Jordan, ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Analyzing the Law of Police Dynamic Entry in Canada.
...paras 8-11, 13, 128. (64.) See ibid at paras 11-13. (65.) See ibid at paras 11-12, 128. (66.) See ibid at para 128. (67.) See R v Chang, 2019 ABCA 315 at paras 1-2 [R v Chang (68.) 2018 ONSC 5452 at paras 3-4, 6. (69.) See ibid at paras 4, 45-49. (70.) See ibid at paras 47-49. (71.) Ibid at......