R. v. Virk,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Chief Justice Bauman,The Honourable Mr. Justice Frankel,The Honourable Madam Justice Fenlon,The Honourable Mr. Justice Fitch,The Honourable Madam Justice DeWitt-Van Oosten |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 BCCA 58 |
| Docket Number | CA46201 |
| Citation | 2021 BCCA 58 |
| Date | 10 February 2021 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Law Society of Saskatchewan v. Abrametz, 2022 SCC 29
...Rail Canada Inc., 2007 SCC 15, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 650; R. v. Yusuf, 2021 SCC 2; R. v. Pauls, 2020 ONCA 220, 149 O.R. (3d) 609; R. v. Virk, 2021 BCCA 58, 403 C.C.C. (3d) 492. Statutes and Regulations Cited Administrative Tribunals Act, S.B.C. 2004, c. 45, s. 58(2)(b). Canadian Charter of R......
-
R. v. R.S.,
...The standard of review on appeals from s. 11(b) decisions was comprehensively addressed by this Court in R. v. Virk, 2021 BCCA 58 at paras. 8–24. In summary: [23] … [The standard of review] will vary depending on the nature of the error ......
-
R. v. Doak,
...court. Further, the Court stressed the Supreme Court has repeatedly endorsed this approach to s. 11(b). Three years later, in R. v. Virk, 2021 BCCA 58, [2021] B.C.J. No. 219 (QL), the Court of Appeal for British Columbia reiterated that the Jordan clock begins to run on the date the Informa......
4 cases
-
Law Society of Saskatchewan v. Abrametz, 2022 SCC 29
...Rail Canada Inc., 2007 SCC 15, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 650; R. v. Yusuf, 2021 SCC 2; R. v. Pauls, 2020 ONCA 220, 149 O.R. (3d) 609; R. v. Virk, 2021 BCCA 58, 403 C.C.C. (3d) 492. Statutes and Regulations Cited Administrative Tribunals Act, S.B.C. 2004, c. 45, s. 58(2)(b). Canadian Charter of R......
-
R v Reeves,
...employs the term of “characterization of delay” in his argument, it is clear that he is referring to “allocation of delay”. In R. v. Virk, 2021 BCCA 58, Justice Fenlon observed that allocation of delay is also commonly referred to as “characterization of delay”. For clarity, she preferred t......
-
R. v. R.S.,
...The standard of review on appeals from s. 11(b) decisions was comprehensively addressed by this Court in R. v. Virk, 2021 BCCA 58 at paras. 8–24. In summary: [23] … [The standard of review] will vary depending on the nature of the error ......
-
R. v. Doak,
...court. Further, the Court stressed the Supreme Court has repeatedly endorsed this approach to s. 11(b). Three years later, in R. v. Virk, 2021 BCCA 58, [2021] B.C.J. No. 219 (QL), the Court of Appeal for British Columbia reiterated that the Jordan clock begins to run on the date the Informa......