Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Canada | +1 (343) 700 0450

R. v. Côté, [2011] 3 SCR 215

Judgment Cited authorities 19 Cited in 285 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, Beverley; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; LeBel, Louis; Deschamps, Marie; Fish, Morris J.; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Charron, Louise; Rothstein, Marshall; Cromwell, Thomas Albert
Citation[2011] 3 SCR 215,2011 SCC 46,JE 2011-1739,[2011] SCJ No 46 (QL),421 NR 112,342 DLR (4th) 77,AZ-50794015,246 CRR (2d) 213,87 CR (6th) 1,[2011] ACS no 46,EYB 2011-196883,97 WCB (2d) 17,276 CCC (3d) 42,[2011] EXP 3108
Docket Number33645
Subject MatterPOLICE,CRIMINAL LAW,CIVIL RIGHTS,EVIDENCE
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date14 October 2011
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
276 practice notes
  • R. v. Henderson (W.E.),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • October 10, 2012
    ...SCC 32, refd to. [para. 81]. R. v. Beaulieu (G.), [2010] 1 S.C.R. 248; 398 N.R. 345; 2010 SCC 7, refd to. [para. 81]. R. v. Côté (A.), [2011] 3 S.C.R. 215; 421 N.R. 112; 2011 SCC 46, refd to. [para. R. v. T.W.B. (2012), 275 Man.R.(2d) 157; 538 W.A.C. 157; 2012 MBCA 7, refd to. [para. 81]. R......
  • R. v. Cole, [2012] 3 SCR 34
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 19, 2012
    ... [1990] 1 S.C.R. 30 ; R. v. Wong, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 36 ; R. v. Grant, 2009 SCC 32 , [2009] 2 S.C.R. 353 ; R. v. Côté, 2011 SCC 46 , [2011] 3 S.C.R. 215; R. v. Belnavis, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 341 ; R. v. Harrison, 2009 SCC 34 , [2009] 2 S.C.R. 494 ; R. v. Calder, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 660 ; R. v. ......
  • R. v. White,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • October 19, 2022
    ...for exclusion, the third inquiry will seldom, if ever, tip the balance in favour of admissibility: see, e.g., R. v. Côté, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 215, [2011] S.C.J. No. 46, 2011 SCC 46, at paras. 81-89; R. v. Morelli, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 253, [2010] S.C.J. No. 8, 2010 SCC 8, at paras. 98-112.......
  • R. v. Taylor (J.K.), (2013) 561 A.R. 103
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • October 10, 2013
    ...reasonable and probable grounds to obtain a warrant? In some circumstances, this may aggravate the seriousness of the breach ( Côté [[2011] 3 S.C.R. 215] at para. 71). Where a police officer could have acted constitutionally but did not, this might indicate that the officer adopted a casual......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
254 cases
  • R. v. Zacharias, 2023 SCC 30
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 1, 2023
    ...Feeney, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 13; R. v. Stillman, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 607; R. v. Caslake, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 51; R. v. Côté, 2011 SCC 46, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 215; R. v. Aucoin, 2012 SCC 66, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 408; R. v. Paterson, 2017 SCC 15, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 202; R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34, [2019] 2 S.C.R......
  • R. v. White,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • October 19, 2022
    ...for exclusion, the third inquiry will seldom, if ever, tip the balance in favour of admissibility: see, e.g., R. v. Côté, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 215, [2011] S.C.J. No. 46, 2011 SCC 46, at paras. 81-89; R. v. Morelli, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 253, [2010] S.C.J. No. 8, 2010 SCC 8, at paras. 98-112.......
  • R. v. Cole, [2012] 3 SCR 34
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 19, 2012
    ... [1990] 1 S.C.R. 30 ; R. v. Wong, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 36 ; R. v. Grant, 2009 SCC 32 , [2009] 2 S.C.R. 353 ; R. v. Côté, 2011 SCC 46 , [2011] 3 S.C.R. 215; R. v. Belnavis, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 341 ; R. v. Harrison, 2009 SCC 34 , [2009] 2 S.C.R. 494 ; R. v. Calder, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 660 ; R. v. ......
  • R. v. Taylor (J.K.), (2013) 561 A.R. 103
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • October 10, 2013
    ...reasonable and probable grounds to obtain a warrant? In some circumstances, this may aggravate the seriousness of the breach ( Côté [[2011] 3 S.C.R. 215] at para. 71). Where a police officer could have acted constitutionally but did not, this might indicate that the officer adopted a casual......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
18 books & journal articles
  • Improperly Obtained Evidence
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...statement. See Chapter 7, Section 5.4 (a), “The General Significance of R v Oickle. ” 73 Wittwer , above note 52. 74 R v Côté , [2011] 3 SCR 215 [ Côté ]. THE L AW OF EVIDENCE 486 6. REQUIREMENT 2: THE EFFECT OF ADMISSION ON THE REPUTE OF THE ADMINISTR ATION OF JUSTICE 6.1) The Mode for Ass......
  • Digest: R v D.P., 2018 SKPC 12
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • March 2, 2018
    ...20, 110 DLR (4th) 297, 162 NR 321, 87 CCC (3d) 193, 26 CR (4th) 289, 19 CRR (2d) 193, 49 MVR (2d) 161, 69 OAC 81 R v C�t�, 2011 SCC 46, [2011] 3 SCR 215 R v Dyment, [1988] 2 SCR 417, 55 DLR (4th) 503, 89 NR 249, 45 CCC (3d) 244, 66 CR (3d) 348, 38 CRR 301, 10 MVR (2d) 1, 73 Nfld & PEIR ......
  • Religious practice as a "thin skull" in the context of civil liability.
    • Canada
    • University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review Vol. 72 No. 1, January - January 2014
    • January 1, 2014
    ...(4th) 129, Cory J [Hill]. (127) Ibid at 1171. (128) Weinrib & Weinrib, supra note 92 at 51. (129) See e.g., R v Cote, 2011 SCC 4, [2011] 3 SCR 215; Hunter et al v Southam Inc, [1984] 2 SCR 145, 11 DLR (4th) 641; see also Jones v Tsige, supra note 105 at paras 46, (130) Weinrib & Wei......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT